The Moderating Role of Emotion Regulation in the Recall of Negative Autobiographical Memories.
When facing a negative event, people implement different strategies to regulate ongoing emotions. Although the previous literature has suggested that the emotional intensity of a negative episode is associated with the characteristics of the subsequent autobiographical memory, it is still unknown whether emotion regulation (ER) moderates this relationship. In the present study, we provided undergraduate students with a smartphone-based diary to report a negative episode immediately after its occurrence and rate the momentary use of two ER strategies: cognitive reappraisal and rumination. To explore autobiographical memory, two "surprise" recall tasks were performed one week and one month after the event. According to the results, cognitive reappraisal was linked with better memory performances, and a tendency to retrospectively underestimate the negativity of highly intense events was observed only in participants adopting high rates of this strategy. Conversely, intense rumination was found to be associated with less detailed memories of emotionally intense events, as well as with higher emotional involvement with negative episodes over time, regardless of their intensity. Together, our results support the maladaptive role of rumination and the adaptive influence of cognitive reappraisal on autobiographical memory.
['Colombo|Desirée|D|', 'Serino|Silvia|S|0000-0002-8422-1358', 'Suso-Ribera|Carlos|C|0000-0002-2655-1017', 'Fernández-Álvarez|Javier|J|', 'Cipresso|Pietro|P|0000-0002-0662-7678', 'García-Palacios|Azucena|A|', 'Riva|Giuseppe|G|0000-0003-3657-106X', 'Botella|Cristina|C|']
D000080103:Emotional Regulation D004644:Emotions D006801:Humans D061212:Memory, Episodic D011939:Mental Recall D012189:Retrospective Studies
emotion regulation autobiographical memory cognitive reappraisal rumination ecological momentary assessment