The History of Patenting Genetic Material.
The US Supreme Court's recent decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. declared, for the first time, that isolated human genes cannot be patented. Many have wondered how genes were ever the subjects of patents. The answer lies in a nuanced understanding of both legal and scientific history. Since the early twentieth century, "products of nature" were not eligible to be patented unless they were "isolated and purified" from their surrounding environment. As molecular biology advanced, and the capability to isolate genes both physically and by sequence came to fruition, researchers (and patent offices) began to apply patent-law logic to genes themselves. These patents, along with other biological patents, generated substantial social and political criticism. Myriad Genetics, a company with patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes critical to assessing early-onset breast and ovarian cancer risk, and with a particularly controversial business approach, became the antagonist in an ultimately successful campaign to overturn gene patents in court. Despite Myriad's defeat, some questions concerning the rights to monopolize genetic information remain. The history leading to that defeat may be relevant to these future issues.
['Sherkow|Jacob S|JS|', 'Greely|Henry T|HT|']
D000818:Animals D030801:Animals, Genetically Modified D019313:BRCA1 Protein D024682:BRCA2 Protein D001695:Biology D005796:Genes D005823:Genetics D049673:History, 20th Century D049674:History, 21st Century D006801:Humans D010330:Patents as Topic D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified D011639:Public Opinion D035521:Supreme Court Decisions D014481:United States
history patents genetics Myriad BRCA intellectual property law