Promoting physical activity in the workplace: A systematic meta-review.
INTRODUCTION
Physically active (PA) people have a lower risk of various diseases, compared to those with sedentary lifestyles. Evidence on the effects of PA promoting programs in the workplace is large, and several systematic reviews (SR) and/or meta-analyses (MA) have been published. However, they have failed to consider factors that could influence interventions. This paper aimed to classify and describe interventions to promote PA in the workplace based on evidence from SR/MA.


METHOD
A literature search for SR/MA was done using PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct (January 2006-February 2015). Quality assessment of SR/MA was performed using AMSTAR. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model was used for classifying the interventions into predisposing, enabling, reinforcing, environment, and policy domains of focus.


RESULTS
Eleven SR/MA included 220 primary studies, of which 139 (63%) were randomized controlled trials. Of 48 interventions identified, 22 (46%) and 17 (35%) focused on predisposing or enabling employees to have more PA, respectively. Of the 22 predisposing factors, 6 were information delivery, 5 were self-motivation, and 11 were program training. The enabling approaches were 12 instrument resources and 5 health service facilities. The reinforcing approaches were 4 incentive and 3 social support. The remaining interventions focused on the environmental development and policy regulation.


CONCLUSIONS
This systematic meta-review classified interventions using appropriate framework and described the intervention pattern.
['Jirathananuwat|Areeya|A|', 'Pongpirul|Krit|K|']
D015444:Exercise D006293:Health Promotion D006801:Humans D007221:Industry D009042:Motivation D016272:Occupational Health D009790:Occupations D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic D012944:Social Support D017132:Workplace
Workplace Review Motor activity