Microleakage under ceramic flash-free orthodontic brackets after thermal cycling.
OBJECTIVE
To compare microleakage under 3M Unitek's APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated System bracket and the APC PLUS Adhesive Coated System bracket after thermal cycling.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty freshly extracted human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into two groups and bonded with either a Flash-Free bracket or a PLUS bracket. After bonding, the samples were incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 24 hours and thermocycled for 5000 cycles between 5°C and 50°C. All teeth were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, embedded in acrylic and sectioned in a buccolingual direction at approximately the center of the bracket. Microleakage was observed at the enamel-adhesive interface from the occlusal and gingival margins of the bracket base. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U-test.


RESULTS
The median microleakage was higher in the Flash-Free group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > .05).


CONCLUSION
In a laboratory setting, there is no significant difference between the extent of microleakage under the APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated System bracket and the APC PLUS Adhesive Coated System bracket after thermal cycling.
['Kim|Julia|J|', 'Kanavakis|Georgios|G|', 'Finkelman|Matthew D|MD|', 'Lee|Moonyoung|M|']
D002516:Ceramics D003188:Composite Resins D001840:Dental Bonding D003763:Dental Leakage D006801:Humans D008422:Materials Testing D016910:Orthodontic Brackets D011897:Random Allocation D019279:Resin Cements
Microleakage Flash-free Thermal cycling Adhesive