A Systematic Review for Cognitive State-Based QoE/UX Evaluation.
Traditional evaluation of user experience is subjective by nature, for what is sought is to use data from physiological and behavioral sensors to interpret the relationship that the user's cognitive states have with the elements of a graphical interface and interaction mechanisms. This study presents the systematic review that was developed to determine the cognitive states that are being investigated in the context of Quality of Experience (QoE)/User Experience (UX) evaluation, as well as the signals and characteristics obtained, machine learning models used, evaluation architectures proposed, and the results achieved. Twenty-nine papers published in 2014-2019 were selected from eight online sources of information, of which 24% were related to the classification of cognitive states, 17% described evaluation architectures, and 41% presented correlations between different signals, cognitive states, and QoE/UX metrics, among others. The amount of identified studies was low in comparison with cognitive state research in other contexts, such as driving or other critical activities; however, this provides a starting point to analyze and interpret states such as mental workload, confusion, and mental stress from various human signals and propose more robust QoE/UX evaluation architectures.
['Bañuelos-Lozoya|Edgar|E|0000-0001-6138-3234', 'González-Serna|Gabriel|G|0000-0002-1874-9402', 'González-Franco|Nimrod|N|0000-0002-1051-1379', 'Fragoso-Diaz|Olivia|O|0000-0001-8512-1941', 'Castro-Sánchez|Noé|N|0000-0002-8083-3891']
D003071:Cognition D006801:Humans
QoE UX cognitive states behavioral data biometric sensors physiological data