I'm Wearing My Hearing Protection - Am I Still At Risk for Hearing Loss? Lurking Ototoxins in the Military Environment.
OBJECTIVE
Information is summarized from the overall body of published literature regarding ototoxic chemicals encountered outside of clinical exposures, largely in occupational settings. While summarizing the most common non-pharmaceutical ototoxins, this review provides clinically relevant information and recommendations such that hearing health professionals may adopt a more comprehensive and appropriate diagnostic case history, test battery, documentation scheme, and education delivery.


METHODS
Solvents, metals, and asphyxiants literature was reviewed using PubMed, national and international agency websites, and communications with known ototoxicity experts.


RESULTS
Initial intentions to summarize the existing programs for occupational ototoxicity monitoring fell short when it was discovered that such programs have not yet formalized across the major oversight agencies in the United States. Instead, recommended guidance documents and fact sheets, which highlight existing occupational exposure limits and suggest monitoring and education are discussed.


CONCLUSIONS
While evidence in humans is limited, potentially ototoxic substances are worthy of improved surveillance and further research to understand their ototoxic mechanisms, effects, and possible mitigation strategies. A triad approach of monitoring, protecting, and educating is recommended for effective prevention of hearing loss: the Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence's Comprehensive Hearing Health Program model employs such an approach.
['Hammill|Tanisha L|TL|', 'McKenna|Elizabeth|E|', 'Hecht|Quintin|Q|', 'Buchanan|Kari|K|', 'Pryor|Nina|N|']
D004430:Ear Protective Devices D034381:Hearing Loss D006801:Humans D008670:Metals D008889:Military Personnel D016273:Occupational Exposure D012307:Risk Factors D012997:Solvents D014481:United States
Hearing Loss Ototoxic Occupational Exposure Noise Exposure Occupational Health