Financing Long-Term Services And Supports: Options Reflect Trade-Offs For Older Americans And Federal Spending.
About half of older Americans will need a high level of assistance with routine activities for a prolonged period of time. This help is commonly referred to as long-term services and supports (LTSS). Under current policies, these individuals will fund roughly half of their paid care out of pocket. Partly as a result of high costs and uncertainty, relatively few people purchase private long-term care insurance or save sufficiently to fully finance LTSS; many will eventually turn to Medicaid for help. To show how policy changes could expand insurance's role in financing these needs, we modeled several new insurance options. Specifically, we looked at a front-end-only benefit that provides coverage relatively early in the period of disability but caps benefits, a back-end benefit with no lifetime limit, and a combined comprehensive benefit. We modeled mandatory and voluntary versions of each option, and subsidized and unsubsidized versions of each voluntary option. We identified important differences among the alternatives, highlighting relevant trade-offs that policy makers can consider in evaluating proposals. If the primary goal is to significantly increase insurance coverage, the mandatory options would be more successful than the voluntary versions. If the major aim is to reduce Medicaid costs, the comprehensive and back-end mandatory options would be most beneficial.
['Favreault|Melissa M|MM|', 'Gleckman|Howard|H|', 'Johnson|Richard W|RW|']
D000368:Aged D005380:Financing, Government D006801:Humans D019458:Insurance Coverage D007353:Insurance, Long-Term Care D008484:Medicaid D008875:Middle Aged D011050:Policy Making D014481:United States
Long-Term Care Elderly Financing Health Care