More metalwork removals in patients with olecranon fracture treated by tension band wiring than plate fixation-a propensity score matching analysis.
BACKGROUND
Traditional tension band wiring and plate fixation represent the commonest methods for treating olecranon fractures. However, there is no agreement on which method provides the best outcome. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of tension band wiring (TBW) and plate fixation (PF) for treating displaced olecranon fractures. This is the first study to use propensity score matching analysis to compare treatment methods for olecranon fracture.


METHOD
A total of 107 patients aged between 18 and 85 had acute isolated and displaced olecranon fractures. The patients were divided into either TBW (n = 49) or PF (n = 58) groups. To conduct propensity score matching for the treatment method (TBW versus PF), 58 patients were analyzed by logistic regression (29 patients in each group). Various demographic and treatment-related variables were examined and analyzed to determine their correlation.


RESULTS
Functional effects between two groups are similar (in terms of Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the patients' range of elbow motion (ROM) and forearm rotation (RFR), the time return to work (RTW)). The total adverse events rate and metalwork removal events rate are higher in TBW than that in PF. After propensity score matching analysis, similar primary treatment efficacy (indicated by MEPS> 90) in 2 groups and more primary adverse events (indicated by metalwork removal) were perceived in TBW than that in PF. Logistic regression analysis revealed that fracture type was an independent factor that affected the efficacy of a treatment (regression coefficient = - 1.24 < 0, P = 0.03), indicating that fracture severity was inversely proportional to the efficacy of a treatment for olecranon fracture. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the treatment method was an independent factor that affected metalwork removal of olecranon fracture (regression coefficient 2.38 > 0, OR = 10.77, P < 0.01), indicating that the risk of metalwork removal in the TBW Group was 10.77 times that in the PF Group.


CONCLUSION
When initially discussing the surgical approach with patients, physicians should fully weigh the possibility that TBW may lead to a second surgery due to the higher risk of internal fixation removal and that TBW won't yield better functional outcomes than PF .
['Qiu|Longhai|L|', 'Li|Yi|Y|', 'Wu|Hongbo|H|', 'Chen|Ruixiong|R|', 'Zhang|Zhiwen|Z|', 'Wang|Xiaofeng|X|', 'Huang|Yuliang|Y|']
D000293:Adolescent D000328:Adult D000368:Aged D000369:Aged, 80 and over D001864:Bone Wires D004551:Elbow Joint D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal D006801:Humans D008875:Middle Aged D056740:Olecranon Process D057216:Propensity Score D012189:Retrospective Studies D016896:Treatment Outcome D014458:Ulna Fractures D055815:Young Adult
Metalwork removal Olecranon fracture Mayo elbow performance score Complications Elbow instability