Incision length for kidney transplantation does not influence short- or long-term outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
While previous studies suggest advantages of minimally invasive surgery in living donor nephrectomy, similar data are lacking for kidney transplant recipients. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate short- and long-term outcome for kidney transplant recipients, comparing a short transverse (ST) to a classical hockey-stick (HS) incision.


METHODS
Sixty-six patients were randomized into two groups: ST vs. HS from January 2008 to May 2010. ST was defined as incision length ≤9 cm and HS as >14 cm. Perioperative data were collected, with evaluation of intra- and postoperative complications and quality of recovery (QoR) score.


RESULTS
There were no significant differences in patient demographics, early or long-term postoperative pain. There were no significant differences in QoR scores between the ST and HS group. Predictive for a worse QoR was persisting incisional pain at the 30-month follow-up. Thirty-days mortality, morbidity, and long-term kidney function did not differ between the two groups (p = 1.00, p = 0.62 and p = 0.66, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS
Patient satisfaction as well as graft function and patient mortality was not influenced by incision length. With patient and graft safety being paramount, especially in times of organ shortage, incision length should reflect the requirement for a successful transplantation and not be a measure of feasibility.
['Malinka|Thomas|T|', 'Banz|Vanessa Martine|VM|', 'Wagner|Jörg|J|', 'Candinas|Daniel|D|', 'Inderbitzin|Daniel|D|']
D005260:Female D005500:Follow-Up Studies D006801:Humans D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic D016030:Kidney Transplantation D019520:Living Donors D008297:Male D008875:Middle Aged D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures D011183:Postoperative Complications D011446:Prospective Studies D011788:Quality of Life D020127:Recovery of Function D013997:Time Factors D016896:Treatment Outcome
kidney transplantation randomized quality of recovery patient satisfaction