Social origin, field of study and graduates' career progression: does social inequality vary across fields?
Research on stratification and mobility has consistently shown that in the UK there is a direct impact of social origin on occupational destination net of educational attainment even for degree-holders. However, only a few studies applied a longitudinal and dynamic perspective on how intergenerational mobility shapes graduates' working careers. Using multilevel growth curve modelling and data from the 1970 British cohort study (BCS70), we contribute to this research by looking at the emergence of social inequalities during the first ten years since labour market entry. We further distinguish between graduates of different fields of study as we expect social disparities to develop differently due to differences in initial occupational placement and upward mobility processes. We find that parental class does not affect occupational prestige over and above prior achievement. Separate analyses by the field of study show that initial differences in occupational prestige and career progression do not differ between graduates from different classes of origin in STEM fields, and arts and humanities. It is only in the social sciences that working-class graduates start with lower occupational prestige but soon catch up with their peers from higher classes. Overall, our results indicate no direct effect of social origin on occupational attainment for degree-holders once we broaden our focus to a dynamic life course perspective.
['Jacob|Marita|M|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-568X', 'Klein|Markus|M|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-8938']
D002322:Career Mobility D005260:Female D006801:Humans D008137:Longitudinal Studies D008297:Male D008962:Models, Theoretical D009790:Occupations D012923:Social Class D012937:Social Mobility D012959:Socioeconomic Factors D013997:Time Factors D006113:United Kingdom
social origin field of study career social inequality occupational prestige