Community-Sourced Intervention Programs: Review of Submissions in Response to a Statewide Call for "Promising Practices".
This study was initiated to add to the nascent literature on locally-grown intervention programs in the youth mental health, child welfare, and juvenile justice service sectors, many of which demonstrate practice-based or community-defined evidence, but may not have been subjected to empirical evaluation. Characteristics of applications submitted in response to three public calls for additions to an inventory of research-supported intervention programs were reviewed on evidence for effectiveness, the use of key quality assurance (QA) elements (e.g., clearly specified training or integrity monitoring procedures), and cultural specificity. Findings indicate that four QA processes were identified in approximately half of all submissions: a specific initial training process, the existence of intervention integrity measures, routine outcome monitoring, and ongoing support post-training. An initial training process and integrity measurement were more commonly described among programs determined to have greater research evidence for their effectiveness. Overall, cultural elements were described relatively infrequently and most often reflected surface-level program delivery characteristics (e.g., offering services in languages other than English). Discussion is focused on the alignment of submitted programs with the larger literatures focused on implementation science and cultural competence.
['Lyon|Aaron R|AR|', 'Pullmann|Michael D|MD|', 'Walker|Sarah Cusworth|SC|', "D'Angelo|Gabrielle|G|"]
D002648:Child D002669:Child Welfare D003256:Community Participation D054521:Cultural Competency D055317:Evidence-Based Practice D006801:Humans D007604:Juvenile Delinquency D008603:Mental Health D011050:Policy Making D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care D014861:Washington
Quality assurance Culture Implementation science Evidence-based practice Policy