Fluctuating Code Status: Strategies to Minimize End-of-Life Conflict in the Neurocritical Care Setting.
BACKGROUND
There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient's wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions.


METHODS
Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues.


RESULTS
We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team.


CONCLUSION
It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient.
['Rath|Kelly A|KA|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-4096', 'Tucker|Kristi L|KL|', 'Lewis|Ariane|A|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-7320']
conflict ethics autonomy advance directive end of life surrogate decision maker