Measuring the adherence energy of the resin-metal interface with two fracture mechanics methods: The DCB and NTP tests.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the abilities of the DCB and the NTP test for measuring adherence of an adhesive joint between a resin and a metal interface.


METHODS
Two-hundred stainless steel metal beams (diam. 50×5×2 mm) were cast and treated by the following methods: (1) sandblasting with aluminum oxide, followed by treatment with (2) the Rocatec system or (3) the Alloy primer. Superbond and Panavia F 2.0 were used as adhesives. The fracture energy (G1C) and fracture toughness (K1C) of two adhesives were compared by two-way analysis of variance.


RESULTS
With the DCB test, Superbond was more effective than Panavia, regardless of the surface treatment and conditions of crack propagation. The overall effectiveness of the treatments was in the following order: sandblasting + Rocatec > sandblasting alone > sandblasting + Alloy primer. The adherence energy in an aqueous medium was lower than that in air. With the NTP test, similar performances were obtained with three surface treatments. However, the potential of Rocatec seemed slightly higher.


CONCLUSIONS
The DCB and NTP tests provide independent measures of the inherent value of an adhesive. Rocatec appeared to provide greater resistance of the bonded joints in an aqueous environment.
['Meng|HongMei|H|', 'Sun|ZhiGuang|Z|', 'Jiang|RiWen|R|', 'Zhang|CongXiao|C|']
D000537:Aluminum Oxide D003722:Dental Alloys D003738:Dental Cements D006801:Humans D008422:Materials Testing D008670:Metals D008689:Methacrylates D019279:Resin Cements D013499:Surface Properties D013871:Thiones
Adherence energy DCB NTP adhesive