Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment.
Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) reveals neovasculature of breast lesions in a two-dimensional contrast enhancement map. Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CEDBT) provides contrast enhancement in three dimensions, which may improve lesion characterization and localization. We aim to compare CEDM and CEDBT for lesion assessment. Women with breast imaging-reporting and data system 4 or 5 suspicious breast lesion(s) were recruited in our study and were imaged with CEDM and CEDBT in succession under one breast compression. Two radiologists assessed CEDM and CEDBT with both images displayed side-by-side and compared (1) contrast enhancement of lesions and (2) lesion margin using a five-point scale ranging from  (CEDM much better) to  (CEDBT much better). Biopsy identified 19 malignant lesions with contrast enhancement. Our results show that CEDBT provides better lesion margins than CEDM with limited reduction in contrast enhancement. CEDBT delivers less radiation dose compared to CEDM + DBT. Synthetic CEDM can be generated from CEDBT data and provides lesion contrast enhancement comparable to CEDM. CEDBT has potential for clinical applications, such as treatment response monitoring and guidance for biopsy.
['Huang|Hailiang|H|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9718', 'Scaduto|David A|DA|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-9066', 'Liu|Chunling|C|', 'Yang|Jie|J|', 'Zhu|Chencan|C|', 'Rinaldi|Kim|K|', 'Eisenberg|Jason|J|', 'Liu|Jingxuan|J|https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-1528', 'Hoernig|Mathias|M|', 'Wicklein|Julia|J|', 'Vogt|Sebastian|S|', 'Mertelmeier|Thomas|T|https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-1954', 'Fisher|Paul R|PR|', 'Zhao|Wei|W|']
contrast-enhanced digital mammography contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis synthetic contrast-enhanced digital mammography