The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review.
In meta-analysis, study participants are nested within studies, leading to a multilevel data structure. The traditional random effects model can be considered as a model with a random study effect, but additional random effects can be added in order to account for dependent effects sizes within or across studies. The goal of this systematic review is three-fold. First, we will describe how multilevel models with multiple random effects (i.e., hierarchical three-, four-, five-level models and cross-classified random effects models) are applied in meta-analysis. Second, we will illustrate how in some specific three-level meta-analyses, a more sophisticated model could have been used to deal with additional dependencies in the data. Third and last, we will describe the distribution of the characteristics of multilevel meta-analyses (e.g., distribution of the number of outcomes across studies or which dependencies are typically modeled) so that future simulation studies can simulate more realistic conditions. Results showed that four- or five-level or cross-classified random effects models are not often used although they might account better for the meta-analytic data structure of the analyzed datasets. Also, we found that the simulation studies done on multilevel meta-analysis with multiple random factors could have used more realistic simulation factor conditions. The implications of these results are discussed, and further suggestions are given.
['Fernández-Castilla|Belén|B|0000-0002-3451-0637', 'Jamshidi|Laleh|L|', 'Declercq|Lies|L|', 'Beretvas|S Natasha|SN|', 'Onghena|Patrick|P|', 'Van den Noortgate|Wim|W|']
D003198:Computer Simulation D006801:Humans D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic D055361:Multilevel Analysis
Systematic review meta-analysis multilevel models multiple effect sizes