Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist survey on abortion training and service provision.
Following a collaborative workshop at the 39th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Reproductive Health Advisory Group identified a need to assess the attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists about abortion services and the available resources at the local and regional levels. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of practicing maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists in the United States regarding abortion. An online survey was distributed to associate and regular members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine to assess their personal training experience, abortion practice patterns, factors that influence their decision to provide abortion care, and their responses to a series of scenarios about high-risk maternal or fetal medical conditions. Frequencies were analyzed and univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted on the survey responses. Of the 2751 members contacted, 546 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine members completed all (448 of 546, 82.1%) or some (98 of 546, 17.9%) of the survey. More than 80% of the respondents reported availability of abortion services in their state, 70% reported availability at their primary institution, and 44% reported provision as part of their personal medical practice. Ease of referral to family planning subspecialists or other abortion providers, institutional restrictions, and the lack of training or continuing education were identified as the most significant factors contributing to the respondents' limited scope of abortion services or lack of any abortion services offered. In the univariable analysis, exposure to formal family planning training programs, fewer years since the completion of residency, current practice setting not being religiously affiliated, and current state categorized as supportive by the Guttmacher Institute's abortion policy landscape were factors associated with abortion provision (all P values <.01). After controlling for these factors in a multivariable regression, exposure to formal family planning training programs was no longer associated with current abortion provision (P=.20; adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-2.10), whereas a favorable state policy environment and fewer years since the completion of residency remained associated with abortion provision. The results of this survey suggest that factors at the individual, institutional, and state levels affect the provision of abortion care by maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists. The subspecialty of maternal-fetal medicine should be active in ensuring adequate training and education to create a community of maternal-fetal medicine physicians able to provide comprehensive reproductive healthcare services.
['|||', 'Lappen|Justin R|JR|', 'Vricella|Laura K|LK|', 'Andrews|Virginia|V|', 'Christensen|Erika|E|', 'Heuser|Cara C|CC|', 'Horvath|Sarah|S|', 'Johnson|Clark T|CT|', 'Louis|Judette M|JM|', 'Luchowski|Alicia T|AT|', 'Norton|Mary E|ME|', 'Sagaser|Katelynn G|KG|', 'Srinivas|Sindhu K|SK|', 'Werner|Erika|E|', 'Zahedi-Spung|Leilah|L|', 'Blackwell|Sean|S|']
D000028:Abortion, Induced D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel D005193:Family Planning Services D005260:Female D006801:Humans D007396:Internship and Residency D008297:Male D010500:Perinatology D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' D011247:Pregnancy D012017:Referral and Consultation D034121:Reproductive Health Services D012955:Societies, Medical D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires D014481:United States
maternal-fetal medicine abortion reproductive health family planning termination