Clinical Situations in Which the Diagnosis of Autism is Debatable: An Analysis and Recommendations : Situations cliniques où le diagnostic d'autisme apporte peu : notre analyse, et nos recommandations.
The "autism spectrum disorder" (ASD) construct and its current diagnostic criteria have led to the inclusion of increasingly heterogeneous and decreasingly atypical individuals under its definition. This broad category, based on the polymorphic clinical expression of common genetic variants underpinning the risk of autism, is likely beneficial for certain individuals. However, determining the boundaries between ASD and typical individuals, as well as those with other neurodevelopmental conditions, remains an issue of which the importance is growing with the increase in ASD prevalence. We identified four clinical contexts associated with a questionable, poorly justified, or unhelpful ASD diagnosis: (1) those in which diagnostic instruments raise uncertainties, (2) in the context of a subclinical presentation, (3) when early autistic signs tend to fade away during development, and (4) when comorbidities are prominent. We argue that in certain cases, a diagnosis of ASD may not be the most suitable, timely, or helpful medical act and provide recommendations for clinical practice when facing such situations.
['Defresne|Pierre|P|', 'Mottron|Laurent|L|https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-5422']
diagnosis autism spectrum disorders comorbidity developmental transformations nosology