Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: physical and chemical distinctions.
Airborne particles containing elemental carbon (EC) are currently at the forefront of scientific and regulatory scrutiny, including black carbon, carbon black, and engineered carbon-based nanomaterials, e.g., carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, and graphene. Scientists and regulators sometimes group these EC-containing particles together, for example, interchangeably using the terms carbon black and black carbon despite one being a manufactured product with well-controlled properties and the other being an undesired, incomplete-combustion byproduct with diverse properties. In this critical review, we synthesize information on the contrasting properties of EC-containing particles in order to highlight significant differences that can affect hazard potential. We demonstrate why carbon black should not be considered a model particle representative of either combustion soots or engineered carbon-based nanomaterials. Overall, scientific studies need to distinguish these highly different EC-containing particles with care and precision so as to forestall unwarranted extrapolation of properties, hazard potential, and study conclusions from one material to another.
['Long|Christopher M|CM|', 'Nascarella|Marc A|MA|', 'Valberg|Peter A|PA|']
D000393:Air Pollutants D002244:Carbon D037741:Fullerenes D037742:Nanotubes, Carbon D010316:Particle Size D053260:Soot
Carbon black Black carbon Elemental carbon Nanomaterial Soot