Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
Face recognition is widely held to rely on 'configural processing', an analysis of spatial relations between facial features. We present three experiments in which viewers were shown distorted faces, and asked to resize these to their correct shape. Based on configural theories appealing to metric distances between features, we reason that this should be an easier task for familiar than unfamiliar faces (whose subtle arrangements of features are unknown). In fact, participants were inaccurate at this task, making between 8% and 13% errors across experiments. Importantly, we observed no advantage for familiar faces: in one experiment participants were more accurate with unfamiliars, and in two experiments there was no difference. These findings were not due to general task difficulty - participants were able to resize blocks of colour to target shapes (squares) more accurately. We also found an advantage of familiarity for resizing other stimuli (brand logos). If configural processing does underlie face recognition, these results place constraints on the definition of 'configural'. Alternatively, familiar face recognition might rely on more complex criteria - based on tolerance to within-person variation rather than highly specific measurement.
['Sandford|Adam|A|', 'Burton|A Mike|AM|']
D005145:Face D005260:Female D006801:Humans D008297:Male D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual D010775:Photic Stimulation D011930:Reaction Time D021641:Recognition, Psychology D055815:Young Adult
Configural processing Face recognition Aspect ratio Holistic processing