Pediatric forearm fractures with in situ intramedullary implants.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this investigation is to present our institutional experience with fractures of the pediatric forearm with in situ intramedullary nails.


METHODS
Six patients treated at our institution for forearm fracture with in situ intramedullary implants between 2004 and 2013 were reviewed. Patient demographics, injury and radiographic characteristics, method of treatment, time to union, and complications were collected from the medical record.


RESULTS
485 patients with forearm fractures were treated with intramedullary implants and six patients presented with a fracture with in situ implants (1.2 %). Fractures in all six patients resulted from a second traumatic event after radiographic healing but before implant removal at a mean of 13.0 months from the initial procedure. One patient had an adequately aligned fracture and was treated with casting without reduction. The remaining five patients (83 %) returned to the operating room for treatment. Two patients underwent rod removal and placement of new intramedullary implants, and two patients were treated with rod removal and plating without attempt at closed reduction. One patient underwent closed reduction in the operating room with successful re-bending of the radial implant and replacement of the ulna implant. All patients went on to uncomplicated radiographic union at a mean 3.6 months.


CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of fracture of pediatric forearm with in situ intramedullary implants is low. This rare complication can be treated by several different methods, including revision TENS placement, revision to plate fixation, or in situ bending of rods, with the expectation for successful uncomplicated union.
['Kelly|Brian A|BA|', 'Shore|Benjamin J|BJ|', 'Bae|Donald S|DS|', 'Hedequist|Daniel J|DJ|', 'Glotzbecker|Michael P|MP|']
Pediatric Forearm Fracture In situ Implants