Contextual cueing is not flexible.
Target detection is faster when search displays repeat, but properties of the memory representations that give rise to this contextual cueing effect remain uncertain. We adapted the contextual cueing task using an ABA design and recorded the eye movements of healthy young adults to determine whether the memory representations are flexible. Targets moved to a new location during the B phase and then returned to their original locations (second A phase). Contextual cueing effects in the first A phase were reinstated immediately in the second A phase, and response time costs eventually gave way to a repeated search advantage in the B phase, suggesting that two target-context associations were learned. However, this apparent flexibility disappeared when eye tracking data were used to subdivide repeated displays based on B-phase viewing of the original target quadrant. Therefore, memory representations acquired in the contextual cueing task resist change and are not flexible.
['Yang|Youcai|Y|', 'Coutinho|Mariana V C|MVC|', 'Greene|Anthony J|AJ|', 'Hannula|Deborah E|DE|']
D001288:Attention D003463:Cues D005133:Eye Movements D006801:Humans D007858:Learning D011930:Reaction Time D055815:Young Adult
Contextual cueing Eye tracking Associative memory Implicit memory Relational memory Representational flexibility