Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the difference in outcome measures and drivers of user preference between premium and entry-level hearing aids using group concept mapping.


DESIGN
A single-blind crossover trial was conducted. Aided behavioural outcomes measured were loudness rating, speech/consonant recognition, and speech quality. Preference between hearing aids was measured with a 7-point Likert scale. Group concept mapping was utilised to investigate preference results. Participants generated statements based on what influenced their preferences. These were sorted into categories with underlying themes. Participants rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of importance.


STUDY SAMPLE
Twenty-three adult participants (mean: 62.4 years; range: 24-78) with mild to moderately severe bilateral SNHL (PTA500-4000 Hz > 20 dB HL).


RESULTS
A total of 83 unique statements and nine distinct clusters, with underlying themes driving preference, were generated. Clusters that differed significantly in importance between entry-level and premium hearing aid choosers were: Having access to smartphone application-based user-controlled settings, the ability to stream calls and music, and convenience features such as accessory compatibility.


CONCLUSION
This study has identified non-signal-processing factors which significantly influenced preference for a premium hearing aid over an entry-level hearing aid, indicating the importance of these features as drivers of user preference.
['Saleh|Hasan K|HK|', 'Folkeard|Paula|P|', 'Van Eeckhoutte|Maaike|M|', 'Scollie|Susan|S|']
Hearing aids concept mapping drivers of preference hearing aid product profile hearing aid technology levels hearing aid user preference non-signal-processing features