Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition.
BACKGROUND
In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)).


METHODS
We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society.


RESULTS
We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders.


CONCLUSIONS
This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level.
['Rodríguez|Daniela C|DC|http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-1123', 'Mohan|Diwakar|D|', 'Mackenzie|Caroline|C|', 'Wilhelm|Jess|J|', 'Eze-Ajoku|Ezinne|E|', 'Omondi|Elizabeth|E|', 'Qiu|Mary|M|', 'Bennett|Sara|S|']
D006078:Government Programs D015658:HIV Infections D006268:Health Facilities D006296:Health Services D006801:Humans D007630:Kenya
HIV Health systems Kenya Donor transition Mixed-methods evaluation Sustainability