Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography.
Assessment of tissue stiffness is desirable for clinicians and researchers, as it is well established that pathophysiological mechanisms often alter the structural properties of tissue. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provides an avenue for measuring tissue stiffness and has a long history of clinical application, including staging liver fibrosis and stratifying breast cancer malignancy. A vital component of MRE consists of the reconstruction algorithms used to derive stiffness from wave-motion images by solving inverse problems. A large range of reconstruction methods have been presented in the literature, with differing computational expense, required user input, underlying physical assumptions, and techniques for numerical evaluation. These differences, in turn, have led to varying accuracy, robustness, and ease of use. While most reconstruction techniques have been validated against in silico or in vitro phantoms, performance with real data is often more challenging, stressing the robustness and assumptions of these algorithms. This article reviews many current MRE reconstruction methods and discusses the aforementioned differences. The material assumptions underlying the methods are developed and various approaches for noise reduction, regularization, and numerical discretization are discussed. Reconstruction methods are categorized by inversion type, underlying assumptions, and their use in human and animal studies. Future directions, such as alternative material assumptions, are also discussed.
['Fovargue|Daniel|D|0000-0002-9303-8491', 'Nordsletten|David|D|', 'Sinkus|Ralph|R|']
D000465:Algorithms D000818:Animals D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena D001921:Brain D054459:Elasticity Imaging Techniques D006801:Humans D008103:Liver Cirrhosis D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging
reconstruction MR elastography inverse problem review shear-modulus tissue stiffness