The Adam Walsh Act: An Examination of Sex Offender Risk Classification Systems.
This study was designed to compare the Adam Walsh Act (AWA) classification tiers with actuarial risk assessment instruments and existing state classification schemes in their respective abilities to identify sex offenders at high risk to re-offend. Data from 1,789 adult sex offenders released from prison in four states were collected (Minnesota, New Jersey, Florida, and South Carolina). On average, the sexual recidivism rate was approximately 5% at 5 years and 10% at 10 years. AWA Tier 2 offenders had higher Static-99R scores and higher recidivism rates than Tier 3 offenders, and in Florida, these inverse correlations were statistically significant. Actuarial measures and existing state tier systems, in contrast, did a better job of identifying high-risk offenders and recidivists. As well, we examined the distribution of risk assessment scores within and across tier categories, finding that a majority of sex offenders fall into AWA Tier 3, but more than half score low or moderately low on the Static-99R. The results indicate that the AWA sex offender classification scheme is a poor indicator of relative risk and is likely to result in a system that is less effective in protecting the public than those currently implemented in the states studied.
['Zgoba|Kristen M|KM|', 'Miner|Michael|M|', 'Levenson|Jill|J|', 'Knight|Raymond|R|', 'Letourneau|Elizabeth|E|', 'Thornton|David|D|']
D000328:Adult D057237:Criminals D005431:Florida D006801:Humans D008297:Male D008875:Middle Aged D008910:Minnesota D009515:New Jersey D012008:Recurrence D018570:Risk Assessment D055502:Secondary Prevention D012742:Sex Offenses D013022:South Carolina D055815:Young Adult
Adam Walsh Act risk classification risk assessment sexual recidivism the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)