Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Surgery - A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.
AIMS
Approximately 75% of fractures are simple, stable injuries which are often unnecessarily immobilised with subsequent repeated radiographs at numerous fracture clinic visits. In 2014, the Glasgow Fracture Pathway offered an alternative virtual fracture clinic (VFC) pathway with the potential to reduce traditional fracture clinic visits, waiting times and overall costs. Many units have implemented this style of pathway in the non-operative management of simple, undisplaced fractures. This study aims to systematically review the clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes and cost analyses for VFCs.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on PRISMA guidelines, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE Library databases. Studies reporting outcomes following the use of VFC were included. Outcomes analysed were: 1) clinical outcomes, 2) patient reported outcomes, and 3) cost analysis.


RESULTS
Overall, 15 studies involving 11,921 patients with a mean age of 41.1 years and mean follow-up of 12.6 months were included. In total, 65.7% of patients were directly virtually discharged with protocol derived conservative management, with 9.1% using the Helpline and 15.6% contacting their general practitioner for advice or reassurance. A total of 1.2% of patients experienced fracture non-unions and 0.4% required surgical intervention. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 81.0%, with only 1.3% experiencing residual pain at the fracture site. Additionally, the mean cost per patient for VFC was £71, with a mean saving of £53 when compared to traditional clinic models. Subgroup analysis found that for undisplaced fifth metatarsal or radial head/neck fractures, the rates of discharge from VFC to physiotherapy or general practitioners were 81.2% and 93.7% respectively.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
This study established that there is excellent evidence to support virtual fracture clinic for non-operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures, with moderate evidence for radial head and neck fractures. However, the routine use of virtual fracture clinics is presently not validated for all stable, undisplaced fracture patterns.


LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV; Systematic Review of all Levels of Evidence.
['Davey|Martin S|MS|', 'Coveney|Eamonn|E|', 'Rowan|Fiachra|F|', 'Cassidy|J Tristan|JT|', 'Cleary|May S|MS|']
D000086382:COVID-19 D003140:Communicable Disease Control D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine D050723:Fractures, Bone D006801:Humans D009985:Orthopedics D017060:Patient Satisfaction D019114:Remote Consultation D016896:Treatment Outcome
Virtual Fracture Clinic VFC COVID-19 TAC Trauma Trauma Assessment Clinic