Bone Marrow Collection.
OBJECTIVES
Bone marrow collections are often difficult, and creating quality smears and touch preparations at the bedside can prove challenging. The objective of this study is to compare the quality of bone marrow specimens between unassisted and assisted bone marrow collections by a bone marrow technologist.


METHODS
Data for this study were collected from 422 hematopathology reports over 14 months. We recorded the bone marrow quality of the different parts (aspirate smears, touch imprints, core biopsy, and clot/particle sections) as adequate, suboptimal, or inadequate. Student t test statistical analysis was performed between the corresponding parts in the two groups.


RESULTS
Our results demonstrate that the quality of assisted bone marrow specimens is significantly better compared with unassisted specimens, particularly for the aspirate smears (P < .0001) and touch imprints (P < .0001). Notably, the quality of aspirate smears was improved, which is important for cytologic evaluation.


CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that assistance by a bone marrow technologist resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of bone marrow collection.
['Ali|Saba F|SF|', 'Cloe|Adam|A|', 'Siaghani|Parwiz J|PJ|', 'Himchak|Evan|E|', 'Cantu|David|D|', 'Gaal|Karl|K|', 'Kim|Young S|YS|', 'Afkhami|Michelle|M|0000-0001-5830-6158', 'Pillai|Raju|R|', 'Chan|Wanda|W|', 'Quirk|Elizabeth|E|', 'Weisenburger|Dennis D|DD|', 'Aoun|Patricia|P|', 'Song|Joo Y|JY|0000-0003-3497-2513']
Bone marrow Quality Assisted Technologist Aspirate Touch imprints