Teamwork in clinical reasoning - cooperative or parallel play?
Teamwork is fundamental for high-quality clinical reasoning and diagnosis, and many different individuals are involved in the diagnostic process. However, there are substantial gaps in how these individuals work as members of teams and, often, work is done in parallel, rather than in an integrated, collaborative fashion. In order to understand how individuals work together to create knowledge in the clinical context, it is important to consider social cognitive theories, including situated cognition and distributed cognition. In this article, the authors describe existing gaps and then describe these theories as well as common structures of teams in health care and then provide ideas for future study and improvement.
['Olson|Andrew P J|APJ|0000-0002-7226-5783', 'Durning|Steven J|SJ|', 'Fernandez Branson|Carolina|C|', 'Sick|Brian|B|', 'Lane|Kathleen P|KP|', 'Rencic|Joseph J|JJ|']
D002983:Clinical Competence D000086723:Clinical Reasoning D003071:Cognition D003695:Delivery of Health Care D006801:Humans
clinical reasoning diagnosis education medical education