Can dogs use vocal intonation as a social referencing cue in an object choice task?
Evidence from the literature indicates that dogs' choices can be influenced by human-delivered social cues, such as pointing, and pointing combined with facial expression, intonation (i.e., rising and falling voice pitch), and/or words. The present study used an object choice task to investigate whether intonation conveys unique information in the absence of other salient cues. We removed facial expression cues and speech information by delivering cues with the experimenter's back to the dog and by using nonword vocalizations. During each trial, the dog was presented with pairs of the following three vocal cues: Positive (happy-sounding), Negative (sad-sounding), and Breath (neutral control). In Experiment 1, where dogs received only these vocal cue pairings, dogs preferred the Positive intonation, and there was no difference in choice behavior between Negative or Breath. In Experiment 2, we included a point cue with one of the two vocal cues in each pairing. Here, dogs preferred containers receiving pointing cues as well as Negative intonation, and preference was greatest when both of these cues were presented together. Taken together, these findings indicate that dogs can indeed extract information from vocal intonation alone, and may use intonation as a social referencing cue. However, the effect of intonation on behavior appears to be strongly influenced by the presence of pointing, which is known to be a highly salient visual cue for dogs. It is possible that in the presence of a point cue, intonation may shift from informative to instructive.
['Colbert-White|Erin N|EN|', 'Tullis|Alexa|A|', 'Andresen|David R|DR|', 'Parker|Kiona M|KM|', 'Patterson|Kaylana E|KE|']
D000818:Animals D002755:Choice Behavior D003463:Cues D004285:Dogs D005260:Female D005868:Gestures D006801:Humans D008297:Male D014831:Voice
Dogs Intonation Social referencing Object choice task Pointing Canis familiaris