Siddon worked as a private duty nurse and on occasion worked in Doctors' Hospital. The hospital called Registry, the private duty referral agency through which Siddon usually obtained employment, and asked that in the future she not be assigned to patients in Doctors' Hospital. Registry asked the hospital why it had made the request. Doctors' Hospital sent a letter to Registry giving as the reason for its request that significant amounts of narcotics had disappeared during Siddon's shift from the nursing stations at which she had worked. If Siddon asserts a claim based on defamation against Doctors' Hospital, Siddon will
recover, because the hospital accused Siddon of improper professional conduct.  recover if Siddon did not take the narcotics. not recover if narcotics disappeared during Siddon's shifts. not recover if the hospital reasonably believed that Siddon took the narcotic
Question: Siddon worked as a private duty nurse and on occasion worked in Doctors' Hospital. The hospital called Registry, the private duty referral agency through which Siddon usually obtained employment, and asked that in the future she not be assigned to patients in Doctors' Hospital. Registry asked the hospital why it had made the request. Doctors' Hospital sent a letter to Registry giving as the reason for its request that significant amounts of narcotics had disappeared during Siddon's shift from the nursing stations at which she had worked. If Siddon asserts a claim based on defamation against Doctors' Hospital, Siddon will
A. recover, because the hospital accused Siddon of improper professional conduct. 
B. recover if Siddon did not take the narcotics.
C. not recover if narcotics disappeared during Siddon's shifts.
D. not recover if the hospital reasonably believed that Siddon took the narcotic
Answer: