Slalome, a ski-shop operator, in a telephone conversation with Mitt, a glove manufacturer, ordered 12 pairs of vortex-lined ski gloves at Mitt's list price of $600 per dozen "for delivery in 30 days." Mitt orally accepted the offer, and immediately faxed to Slalome this signed memo: "Confirming our agreement today for your purchase of a dozen pairs of vortex-lined ski gloves for $600, the shipment will be delivered in 30 days." Although will be delivered in 30 days." Although Slalome received and read Mitt's message within minutes after its dispatch, she changed her mind three weeks later about the purchase and rejected the conforming shipment when it timely arrived. On learning of the rejection, does Mitt have a cause of action against Slalome for breach of contract? 
Yes, because the gloves were identified to the contract and tendered to Slalome.  Yes, because Mitt's faxed memo to Slalome was sufficient to make the agreement enforceable.  No, because the agreed price was $600 and Slalome never signed a writing evidencing a contract with Mitt.  No, because Slalome neither paid for nor accepted any of the goods tendered. 
Question: Slalome, a ski-shop operator, in a telephone conversation with Mitt, a glove manufacturer, ordered 12 pairs of vortex-lined ski gloves at Mitt's list price of $600 per dozen "for delivery in 30 days." Mitt orally accepted the offer, and immediately faxed to Slalome this signed memo: "Confirming our agreement today for your purchase of a dozen pairs of vortex-lined ski gloves for $600, the shipment will be delivered in 30 days." Although will be delivered in 30 days." Although Slalome received and read Mitt's message within minutes after its dispatch, she changed her mind three weeks later about the purchase and rejected the conforming shipment when it timely arrived. On learning of the rejection, does Mitt have a cause of action against Slalome for breach of contract? 
A. Yes, because the gloves were identified to the contract and tendered to Slalome. 
B. Yes, because Mitt's faxed memo to Slalome was sufficient to make the agreement enforceable. 
C. No, because the agreed price was $600 and Slalome never signed a writing evidencing a contract with Mitt. 
D. No, because Slalome neither paid for nor accepted any of the goods tendered. 
Answer: