While driving his car, Plaintiff sustained injuries in a three-car collision. Plaintiff sued the drivers of the other two cars, D-l and D-2, and each defendant crossclaimed against the other for contribution. The jurisdiction has adopted a rule of pure comparative negligence and allows contribution based upon proportionate fault. The rule of joint and several liability has been retained. The jury has found that Plaintiff sustained damages in the amount of $100,000, and apportioned the causal negligence of the parties as follows: Plaintiff 40%, D-l 30%, and D-2 30%. How much, if anything, can Plaintiff collect from D-l, and how much, if anything, can D-l then collect from D-2 in contribution? 
Nothing, and then D-l can collect nothing from D-2.  $30,000, and then D-l can collect nothing from D-2.  $40,000, and then D-l can collect $10,000 from D-2.  $60,000, and then D-l can collect $30,000 from D-2. 
Question: While driving his car, Plaintiff sustained injuries in a three-car collision. Plaintiff sued the drivers of the other two cars, D-l and D-2, and each defendant crossclaimed against the other for contribution. The jurisdiction has adopted a rule of pure comparative negligence and allows contribution based upon proportionate fault. The rule of joint and several liability has been retained. The jury has found that Plaintiff sustained damages in the amount of $100,000, and apportioned the causal negligence of the parties as follows: Plaintiff 40%, D-l 30%, and D-2 30%. How much, if anything, can Plaintiff collect from D-l, and how much, if anything, can D-l then collect from D-2 in contribution? 
A. Nothing, and then D-l can collect nothing from D-2. 
B. $30,000, and then D-l can collect nothing from D-2. 
C. $40,000, and then D-l can collect $10,000 from D-2. 
D. $60,000, and then D-l can collect $30,000 from D-2. 
Answer: