When Parents were told that their child, Son, should repeat second grade, they sought to have him evaluated by a psychologist. The psychologist, who charged $300, determined that Son had a learning disability. Based upon the report, the school board placed Son in special classes. At an open meeting of the school board, Parents asked that the $300 they had paid to the psychologist be reimbursed by the school district. A reporter attending the meeting wrote a newspaper article about this request, mentioning Son by name. In a privacy action brought by Son's legal representative against the newspaper, the plaintiff will 
recover, because the story is not newsworthy.  recover, because Son is under the age of consent.  not recover, if the story is a fair and accurate report of what transpired at the meeting.  not recover, if Parents knew that the reporter was present.
Question: When Parents were told that their child, Son, should repeat second grade, they sought to have him evaluated by a psychologist. The psychologist, who charged $300, determined that Son had a learning disability. Based upon the report, the school board placed Son in special classes. At an open meeting of the school board, Parents asked that the $300 they had paid to the psychologist be reimbursed by the school district. A reporter attending the meeting wrote a newspaper article about this request, mentioning Son by name. In a privacy action brought by Son's legal representative against the newspaper, the plaintiff will 
A. recover, because the story is not newsworthy. 
B. recover, because Son is under the age of consent. 
C. not recover, if the story is a fair and accurate report of what transpired at the meeting. 
D. not recover, if Parents knew that the reporter was present.
Answer: