Pitt sued Dow for damages for injuries that Pitt incurred when a badly rotted limb fell from a curbside tree in front of Dow's home and hit Pitt. Dow claimed that the tree was on city property and thus was the responsibility of the city. At trial, Pitt offered testimony that a week after the accident, Dow had cut the tree down with a chain saw. The offered evidence is
inadmissible, because there is a policy to encourage safety precautions.  inadmissible, because it is irrelevant to the condition of the tree at the time of the accident.  admissible to show that the tree was on Dow's property. 83 admissible to show that the tree was in a rotted condition
Question: Pitt sued Dow for damages for injuries that Pitt incurred when a badly rotted limb fell from a curbside tree in front of Dow's home and hit Pitt. Dow claimed that the tree was on city property and thus was the responsibility of the city. At trial, Pitt offered testimony that a week after the accident, Dow had cut the tree down with a chain saw. The offered evidence is
A. inadmissible, because there is a policy to encourage safety precautions. 
B. inadmissible, because it is irrelevant to the condition of the tree at the time of the accident. 
C. admissible to show that the tree was on Dow's property. 83
D. admissible to show that the tree was in a rotted condition
Answer: