Penn sued Duke's Bar for injuries suffered in an automobile accident caused by Chase, who had been a patron of Duke's Bar. Penn claimed that Chase was permitted to drink too much liquor at Duke's Bar before the accidentPenn offered evidence that, after the accident, the manager of Duke's Bar established house rules limiting all customers to two drinks per hour, with a maximum limit of four drinks per night. This evidence is
admissible to show that the prior conduct of Duke's Bar was negligent. admissible to show that Duke's Bar was aware of the need for taking precautionary measures. inadmissible, because subsequent measures by an employee are not binding on Duke's Bar.  inadmissible, because its admission would discourage the taking of such remedial measures
Question: Penn sued Duke's Bar for injuries suffered in an automobile accident caused by Chase, who had been a patron of Duke's Bar. Penn claimed that Chase was permitted to drink too much liquor at Duke's Bar before the accidentPenn offered evidence that, after the accident, the manager of Duke's Bar established house rules limiting all customers to two drinks per hour, with a maximum limit of four drinks per night. This evidence is
A. admissible to show that the prior conduct of Duke's Bar was negligent.
B. admissible to show that Duke's Bar was aware of the need for taking precautionary measures.
C. inadmissible, because subsequent measures by an employee are not binding on Duke's Bar. 
D. inadmissible, because its admission would discourage the taking of such remedial measures
Answer: