On June 1, Kravat, a manufacturer of men's neckties, received the following order from Clothier: "Ship 500 two-inch ties, assorted stripes, your catalogue No. V34. Delivery by July l." On June 1, Kravat shipped 500 three-inch ties that arrived at Clothier's place of business on June 3. Clothier immediately telegraphed Kravat: "Reject your shipment. Order was for two-inch ties." Clothier, however, did not ship the ties back to Kravat. Kravat replied by telegram: "Will deliver proper ties before July 1." Clothier received this telegram on June 4, but did not reply to it. On June 30, Kravat tendered 500 two-inch ties in assorted stripes, designated in his catalogue as item No. V34; but Clothier refused to accept them.Did Clothier properly reject the ties delivered on June 3?
Yes, because the ties were nonconforming goods.  Yes, because Kravat did not notify Clothier that the ties were shipped as an accommodation to Clothier.  No, because Kravat could accept Clothier's offer by prompt shipment of either conforming or nonconforming goods.  No, because Clothier waived his right to reject the ties by not returning them promptly to Kravat.
Question: On June 1, Kravat, a manufacturer of men's neckties, received the following order from Clothier: "Ship 500 two-inch ties, assorted stripes, your catalogue No. V34. Delivery by July l." On June 1, Kravat shipped 500 three-inch ties that arrived at Clothier's place of business on June 3. Clothier immediately telegraphed Kravat: "Reject your shipment. Order was for two-inch ties." Clothier, however, did not ship the ties back to Kravat. Kravat replied by telegram: "Will deliver proper ties before July 1." Clothier received this telegram on June 4, but did not reply to it. On June 30, Kravat tendered 500 two-inch ties in assorted stripes, designated in his catalogue as item No. V34; but Clothier refused to accept them.Did Clothier properly reject the ties delivered on June 3?
A. Yes, because the ties were nonconforming goods. 
B. Yes, because Kravat did not notify Clothier that the ties were shipped as an accommodation to Clothier. 
C. No, because Kravat could accept Clothier's offer by prompt shipment of either conforming or nonconforming goods. 
D. No, because Clothier waived his right to reject the ties by not returning them promptly to Kravat.
Answer: