Cycle Company manufactured a bicycle that it sold to Bike Shop, a retail bicycle dealer, which in turn sold it to Roth. Shortly thereafter, while Roth was riding the bicycle along a city street, he saw a traffic light facing him turn from green to yellow. He sped up, hoping to cross the intersection before the light turned red. However, Roth quickly realized that he could not do so and applied the brake, which failed. To avoid the traffic that was then crossing in front of him, Roth turned sharply to his right and onto the sidewalk, where he struck Perez, a pedestrian. Both Perez and Roth sustained injuries.""If Perez asserts a claim based on negligence against Cycle Company and if it is found that the brake failure resulted from a manufacturing defect in the bicycle, will Perez prevail?
Yes, because Cycle Company placed a defective bicycle into the stream of commerce.  Yes, if the defect could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable care by Cycle Company.  No, because Perez was not a purchaser of the bicycle.  No, if Roth was negligent in turning onto the sidewalk
Question: Cycle Company manufactured a bicycle that it sold to Bike Shop, a retail bicycle dealer, which in turn sold it to Roth. Shortly thereafter, while Roth was riding the bicycle along a city street, he saw a traffic light facing him turn from green to yellow. He sped up, hoping to cross the intersection before the light turned red. However, Roth quickly realized that he could not do so and applied the brake, which failed. To avoid the traffic that was then crossing in front of him, Roth turned sharply to his right and onto the sidewalk, where he struck Perez, a pedestrian. Both Perez and Roth sustained injuries.""If Perez asserts a claim based on negligence against Cycle Company and if it is found that the brake failure resulted from a manufacturing defect in the bicycle, will Perez prevail?
A. Yes, because Cycle Company placed a defective bicycle into the stream of commerce. 
B. Yes, if the defect could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable care by Cycle Company. 
C. No, because Perez was not a purchaser of the bicycle. 
D. No, if Roth was negligent in turning onto the sidewalk
Answer: