Under the rule allowing exclusion of relevant evidence because its probative value is substantially outweighed by other considerations, which of the following is NOT to be considered? 
The jury may be confused about the appropriate application of the evidence to the issues of the case. The evidence is likely to arouse unfair prejudice on the part of the jury. The opponent is surprised by the evidence and not fairly prepared to meet it. The trial will be extended and made cumbersome by hearing evidence of relatively trivial consequence.
Question: Under the rule allowing exclusion of relevant evidence because its probative value is substantially outweighed by other considerations, which of the following is NOT to be considered? 
A. The jury may be confused about the appropriate application of the evidence to the issues of the case.
B. The evidence is likely to arouse unfair prejudice on the part of the jury.
C. The opponent is surprised by the evidence and not fairly prepared to meet it.
D. The trial will be extended and made cumbersome by hearing evidence of relatively trivial consequence.
Answer: