Daniel and a group of his friends are fanatical basketball fans who regularly meet at each others' homes to watch basketball games on television. Some of the group are fans of team A, and others are fans of team B. When the group has watched televised games between these two teams, fights sometimes have these two teams, fights sometimes have broken out among the group. Despite this fact, Daniel invited the group to his home to watch a championship game between teams A and B. During the game, Daniel's guests became rowdy and antagonistic. Fearing that they would begin to fight, and that a fight would damage his possessions, Daniel asked his guests to leave. They refused to go and soon began to fight. Daniel called the police, and Officer was sent to Daniel's home. Officer sustained a broken nose in his efforts to stop the fighting. Officer brought an action against Daniel alleging that Daniel was negligent in inviting the group to his house to watch this championship game. Daniel has moved to dismiss the complaint. The best argument in support of this motion would be that 
a rescuer injured while attempting to avert a danger cannot recover damages from the endangered person. a police officer is not entitled to a recovery based upon the negligent conduct that created the need for the officer's professional intervention. as a matter of law, Daniel's conduct was not the proximate cause of Officer's injury.  Daniel did not owe Officer a duty to use reasonable care, because Officer was a mere licensee on Daniel's property. 
Question: Daniel and a group of his friends are fanatical basketball fans who regularly meet at each others' homes to watch basketball games on television. Some of the group are fans of team A, and others are fans of team B. When the group has watched televised games between these two teams, fights sometimes have these two teams, fights sometimes have broken out among the group. Despite this fact, Daniel invited the group to his home to watch a championship game between teams A and B. During the game, Daniel's guests became rowdy and antagonistic. Fearing that they would begin to fight, and that a fight would damage his possessions, Daniel asked his guests to leave. They refused to go and soon began to fight. Daniel called the police, and Officer was sent to Daniel's home. Officer sustained a broken nose in his efforts to stop the fighting. Officer brought an action against Daniel alleging that Daniel was negligent in inviting the group to his house to watch this championship game. Daniel has moved to dismiss the complaint. The best argument in support of this motion would be that 
A. a rescuer injured while attempting to avert a danger cannot recover damages from the endangered person.
B. a police officer is not entitled to a recovery based upon the negligent conduct that created the need for the officer's professional intervention.
C. as a matter of law, Daniel's conduct was not the proximate cause of Officer's injury. 
D. Daniel did not owe Officer a duty to use reasonable care, because Officer was a mere licensee on Daniel's property. 
Answer: