By the terms of a written contract signed by both parties on January 15, M.B. Ram, Inc., agreed to sell a specific ICB personal computer to Marilyn Materboard for $3,000, and Materboard agreed to pick up and pay for the computer at Ram's store on February 1. Materboard unjustifiably repudiated on February 1. Without notifying Materboard, Ram subsequently sold at private sale the same specific computer to Byte, who paid the same price ($3,000) in cash. The ICB is a popular product. Ram can buy from the manufacturer more units than it can sell at retail. If Ram sues Materboard for breach of contract, Ram will probably recover 
nothing, because it received a price on resale equal to the contract price that Materboard had agreed to pay.  nothing, because Ram failed to give Materboard proper notice of Ram's intention to resell.  Ram's anticipated profit on the sale to Materboard plus incidental damages, if any, because Ram lost that sale.  $3,000 (the contract price), because Materboard intentionally breached the contract by repudiation.
Question: By the terms of a written contract signed by both parties on January 15, M.B. Ram, Inc., agreed to sell a specific ICB personal computer to Marilyn Materboard for $3,000, and Materboard agreed to pick up and pay for the computer at Ram's store on February 1. Materboard unjustifiably repudiated on February 1. Without notifying Materboard, Ram subsequently sold at private sale the same specific computer to Byte, who paid the same price ($3,000) in cash. The ICB is a popular product. Ram can buy from the manufacturer more units than it can sell at retail. If Ram sues Materboard for breach of contract, Ram will probably recover 
A. nothing, because it received a price on resale equal to the contract price that Materboard had agreed to pay. 
B. nothing, because Ram failed to give Materboard proper notice of Ram's intention to resell. 
C. Ram's anticipated profit on the sale to Materboard plus incidental damages, if any, because Ram lost that sale. 
D. $3,000 (the contract price), because Materboard intentionally breached the contract by repudiation.
Answer: