In an automobile collision case brought by Poe against Davies, Poe introduced evidence that Ellis made an excited utterance that Davies ran the red light. Davies called Witt to testify that later Ellis, a bystander, now deceased, told Witt that Davies went through a yellow light. Witt's testimony should be 
excluded, because it is hearsay not within any exception.  excluded, because Ellis is not available to explain or deny the inconsistency.  admitted only for the purpose of impeaching Ellis. admitted as impeachment and as substantive evidence of the color of the light.
Question: In an automobile collision case brought by Poe against Davies, Poe introduced evidence that Ellis made an excited utterance that Davies ran the red light. Davies called Witt to testify that later Ellis, a bystander, now deceased, told Witt that Davies went through a yellow light. Witt's testimony should be 
A. excluded, because it is hearsay not within any exception. 
B. excluded, because Ellis is not available to explain or deny the inconsistency. 
C. admitted only for the purpose of impeaching Ellis.
D. admitted as impeachment and as substantive evidence of the color of the light.
Answer: