Deetz was prosecuted for homicide. He testified that he shot in self-defense. In rebuttal, Officer Watts testified that he came to the scene in response to a telephone call from Deetz. Watts offers to testify that he asked, "What is the problem here, sir?" and Deetz replied, "I was cleaning my gun and it went off accidentally." The offered testimony is
admissible as an excited utterance. admissible to impeach Deetz and as evidence that he did not act in self-defense. inadmissible, because of Deetz's privilege against self-incrimination.  inadmissible, because it tends to exculpate without corroboration
Question: Deetz was prosecuted for homicide. He testified that he shot in self-defense. In rebuttal, Officer Watts testified that he came to the scene in response to a telephone call from Deetz. Watts offers to testify that he asked, "What is the problem here, sir?" and Deetz replied, "I was cleaning my gun and it went off accidentally." The offered testimony is
A. admissible as an excited utterance.
B. admissible to impeach Deetz and as evidence that he did not act in self-defense.
C. inadmissible, because of Deetz's privilege against self-incrimination. 
D. inadmissible, because it tends to exculpate without corroboration
Answer: