On trial for murdering her husband, Defendant testified she acted in self-defense. Defendant calls Expert, a psychologist, to testify that under hypnosis Defendant had described the killing, and that in Expert's opinion Defendant had been in fear for her life at the time of the killing. Is Expert's testimony admissible? 
Yes, because Expert was able to ascertain that Defendant was speaking truthfully.  Yes, because it reports a prior consistent statement by a witness (Defendant) subject to examination concerning it.  No, because reliance on information tainted by hypnosis is unconstitutional.  No, because it expresses an opinion concerning Defendant's mental state at the time of the killing. 
Question: On trial for murdering her husband, Defendant testified she acted in self-defense. Defendant calls Expert, a psychologist, to testify that under hypnosis Defendant had described the killing, and that in Expert's opinion Defendant had been in fear for her life at the time of the killing. Is Expert's testimony admissible? 
A. Yes, because Expert was able to ascertain that Defendant was speaking truthfully. 
B. Yes, because it reports a prior consistent statement by a witness (Defendant) subject to examination concerning it. 
C. No, because reliance on information tainted by hypnosis is unconstitutional. 
D. No, because it expresses an opinion concerning Defendant's mental state at the time of the killing. 
Answer: