Miller is tried for armed robbery of the First Bank of City.. The prosecutor offers the testimony of a bartender who will say that when he saw the money in Miller's wallet, he said, "You must have robbed a bank," to which Miller made no reply. This evidence is
admissible to prove that Miller's conduct caused the bartender to believe that Miller robbed the bank. admissible as a statement made in the presence of the defendant. inadmissible, because it would violate Miller's privilege against selfincrimination.  inadmissible, because Miller had no reason to respond to the bartender's statement.
Question: Miller is tried for armed robbery of the First Bank of City.. The prosecutor offers the testimony of a bartender who will say that when he saw the money in Miller's wallet, he said, "You must have robbed a bank," to which Miller made no reply. This evidence is
A. admissible to prove that Miller's conduct caused the bartender to believe that Miller robbed the bank.
B. admissible as a statement made in the presence of the defendant.
C. inadmissible, because it would violate Miller's privilege against selfincrimination. 
D. inadmissible, because Miller had no reason to respond to the bartender's statement.
Answer: