Dann, who was charged with the crime of assaulting Smith, admitted striking Smith but claimed to have acted in self-defense when he was attacked by Smith, who was drunk and belligerent after a football game.On cross-examination of Employer, the state's attorney asked Employer if he had heard that Dann often engaged in fights and brawls. The trial judge should rule the question
not objectionable, because evidence of Dann's previous fights and brawls may be used to prove his guilt.  not objectionable, because it testsEmployer's knowledge of Dann's reputation.  objectionable, because it seeks to put into evidence separate, unrelated offenses.  objectionable, because no specific times or incidents are specified and inquired about
Question: Dann, who was charged with the crime of assaulting Smith, admitted striking Smith but claimed to have acted in self-defense when he was attacked by Smith, who was drunk and belligerent after a football game.On cross-examination of Employer, the state's attorney asked Employer if he had heard that Dann often engaged in fights and brawls. The trial judge should rule the question
A. not objectionable, because evidence of Dann's previous fights and brawls may be used to prove his guilt. 
B. not objectionable, because it testsEmployer's knowledge of Dann's reputation. 
C. objectionable, because it seeks to put into evidence separate, unrelated offenses. 
D. objectionable, because no specific times or incidents are specified and inquired about
Answer: