A threatening telephone call that purports to be from Defendant to Witness is most likely to be admitted against Defendant if
the caller identified himself as Defendant. Witness had previously given damaging testimony against Defendant in another lawsuit. Witness had given his unlisted number only to Defendant and a few other persons. Witness believes that Defendant is capable of making such threats.
Question: A threatening telephone call that purports to be from Defendant to Witness is most likely to be admitted against Defendant if
A. the caller identified himself as Defendant.
B. Witness had previously given damaging testimony against Defendant in another lawsuit.
C. Witness had given his unlisted number only to Defendant and a few other persons.
D. Witness believes that Defendant is capable of making such threats.
Answer: