Decker, charged with armed robbery of a store, denied that he was the person who had robbed the store. In presenting the state's case, the prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence that Decker had robbed two other stores in the past year. This evidence is 
admissible, to prove a pertinent trait of Decker's character and Decker's action in conformity therewith.  admissible, to prove Decker's intent and identity.  inadmissible, because character must be proved by reputation or opinion and may not be proved by specific acts.  inadmissible, because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. 
Question: Decker, charged with armed robbery of a store, denied that he was the person who had robbed the store. In presenting the state's case, the prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence that Decker had robbed two other stores in the past year. This evidence is 
A. admissible, to prove a pertinent trait of Decker's character and Decker's action in conformity therewith. 
B. admissible, to prove Decker's intent and identity. 
C. inadmissible, because character must be proved by reputation or opinion and may not be proved by specific acts. 
D. inadmissible, because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. 
Answer: