While on a hiking trip during the late fall, Page arrived, toward the end of the day, at a clearing where several similar cabins were located, none of which was occupied. One of the cabins belonged to Levin, Page's friend, who had given Page permission to use it. Page entered one of the cabins, which she thought was Levin's, and prepared to spend the night. In fact the cabin was owned, not by Levin, but by Dwyer. When the night turned cold, Page started a fire in the stove. Unknown to Page, there was a defect in the stove that allowed carbon monoxide fumes to escape into the cabin. During the night the fumes caused serious injury to Page. If Page asserts a claim against Dwyer for her injury, will Page recover?
Yes, if Dwyer knew that the stove was defective.  Yes, if Dwyer could have discovered the defect in the stove by a reasonable inspection.  No, because Dwyer had no reason to anticipate Page's presence in the cabin.  No, unless Page needed to use the cabin for her own protection.
Question: While on a hiking trip during the late fall, Page arrived, toward the end of the day, at a clearing where several similar cabins were located, none of which was occupied. One of the cabins belonged to Levin, Page's friend, who had given Page permission to use it. Page entered one of the cabins, which she thought was Levin's, and prepared to spend the night. In fact the cabin was owned, not by Levin, but by Dwyer. When the night turned cold, Page started a fire in the stove. Unknown to Page, there was a defect in the stove that allowed carbon monoxide fumes to escape into the cabin. During the night the fumes caused serious injury to Page. If Page asserts a claim against Dwyer for her injury, will Page recover?
A. Yes, if Dwyer knew that the stove was defective. 
B. Yes, if Dwyer could have discovered the defect in the stove by a reasonable inspection. 
C. No, because Dwyer had no reason to anticipate Page's presence in the cabin. 
D. No, unless Page needed to use the cabin for her own protection.
Answer: