Pat sustained personal injuries in a three-car collision caused by the concurrent negligence of the three drivers, Pat, Donald, and Drew. In Pat's action for damages against Donald and Drew, the jury apportioned the negligence 30% to Pat, 30% to Donald, and 40% to Drew. Pat's total damages were $100,000. Assume for this question only that the state has retained the common-law rule pertaining to contribution and that the state's comparative negligence statute provides for a system of pure comparative negligence but abolishes joint and several liability. If Pat chooses to execute against Donald alone, she will be entitled to collect at most 
$70,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $40,000 from Drew.  $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $10,000 from Drew.  $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect nothing from Drew.  nothing from Donald, because Donald's percentage of fault is not greater than that of Pat. 
Question: Pat sustained personal injuries in a three-car collision caused by the concurrent negligence of the three drivers, Pat, Donald, and Drew. In Pat's action for damages against Donald and Drew, the jury apportioned the negligence 30% to Pat, 30% to Donald, and 40% to Drew. Pat's total damages were $100,000. Assume for this question only that the state has retained the common-law rule pertaining to contribution and that the state's comparative negligence statute provides for a system of pure comparative negligence but abolishes joint and several liability. If Pat chooses to execute against Donald alone, she will be entitled to collect at most 
A. $70,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $40,000 from Drew. 
B. $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $10,000 from Drew. 
C. $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect nothing from Drew. 
D. nothing from Donald, because Donald's percentage of fault is not greater than that of Pat. 
Answer: