Alford was a suspect in a homicide committed during a robbery of a liquor store. Barber was a friend of Alford. Police telephoned Barber and asked if he would help locate Alford. Barber agreed and met the police officers at headquarters later that night. After a discussion during which police asked questions about Alford and the homicide, Barber said that he wanted to get something "off his chest" and advised the officers that he was in on the robbery but that Alford had shot the owner of the store without his permission or prior knowledge. The officers then for the first time gave Barber his Miranda warnings. Barber was indicted for felony murder. He moved to prevent the introduction of his statement into evidence. His motion should be
granted, because Barber was effectively in custody and entitled to receive Miranda warnings at the beginning of the discussion.  granted, because Barber's rights to counsel and to due process were violated by the interrogation at police headquarters.  denied, because his statement was freely and voluntarily given and he was not entitled to Miranda warnings.  denied, because by visiting headquarters voluntarily, Barber waived his right to receive Miranda warnings at the beginning of the discussion
Question: Alford was a suspect in a homicide committed during a robbery of a liquor store. Barber was a friend of Alford. Police telephoned Barber and asked if he would help locate Alford. Barber agreed and met the police officers at headquarters later that night. After a discussion during which police asked questions about Alford and the homicide, Barber said that he wanted to get something "off his chest" and advised the officers that he was in on the robbery but that Alford had shot the owner of the store without his permission or prior knowledge. The officers then for the first time gave Barber his Miranda warnings. Barber was indicted for felony murder. He moved to prevent the introduction of his statement into evidence. His motion should be
A. granted, because Barber was effectively in custody and entitled to receive Miranda warnings at the beginning of the discussion. 
B. granted, because Barber's rights to counsel and to due process were violated by the interrogation at police headquarters. 
C. denied, because his statement was freely and voluntarily given and he was not entitled to Miranda warnings. 
D. denied, because by visiting headquarters voluntarily, Barber waived his right to receive Miranda warnings at the beginning of the discussion
Answer: