Plaza Hotel sued Plaza House Hotel for infringement of its trade name. To establish a likelihood of name confusion, Plaintiff Plaza Hotel offers a series of memoranda which it had asked its employees to prepare at the end of each day listing instances during the day in which telephone callers, cab drivers, customers, and others had confused the two names. The memoranda should be 
excluded, because they are more unfairly prejudicial and confusing than probative.  excluded, because they are hearsay not within any exception.  admitted, because they are records of regularly conducted business activity.  admitted, because they are past recollection recorded.
Question: Plaza Hotel sued Plaza House Hotel for infringement of its trade name. To establish a likelihood of name confusion, Plaintiff Plaza Hotel offers a series of memoranda which it had asked its employees to prepare at the end of each day listing instances during the day in which telephone callers, cab drivers, customers, and others had confused the two names. The memoranda should be 
A. excluded, because they are more unfairly prejudicial and confusing than probative. 
B. excluded, because they are hearsay not within any exception. 
C. admitted, because they are records of regularly conducted business activity. 
D. admitted, because they are past recollection recorded.
Answer: