Passenger is suing Defendant for injuries suffered in the crash of a small airplane, alleging that Defendant had owned the plane and negligently failed to have it properly maintained. Defendant has asserted in defense that he never owned the plane or had any responsibility to maintain it. At trial, Passenger calls Witness to testify that Witness had sold to Defendant a liability insurance policy on the plane. The testimony of Witness is 
inadmissible, because the policy itself is required under the original document rule.  inadmissible, because of the rule against proof of insurance where insurance is not itself at issue.  admissible to show that Defendant had little motivation to invest money in maintenance of the airplane. admissible as some evidence of Defendant's ownership of or responsibility for the airplane.
Question: Passenger is suing Defendant for injuries suffered in the crash of a small airplane, alleging that Defendant had owned the plane and negligently failed to have it properly maintained. Defendant has asserted in defense that he never owned the plane or had any responsibility to maintain it. At trial, Passenger calls Witness to testify that Witness had sold to Defendant a liability insurance policy on the plane. The testimony of Witness is 
A. inadmissible, because the policy itself is required under the original document rule. 
B. inadmissible, because of the rule against proof of insurance where insurance is not itself at issue. 
C. admissible to show that Defendant had little motivation to invest money in maintenance of the airplane.
D. admissible as some evidence of Defendant's ownership of or responsibility for the airplane.
Answer: