Hal and Wan owned Blackacre as joint tenants, upon which was situated a two-family house. Hal lived in one of the two apartments and rented the other apartment to Tent. Hal got in a fight with Tent and injured him. Tent obtained and properly filed a judgment for $10,000 against Hal. The statute in the jurisdiction reads: Any judgment properly filed shall, for ten years from filing, be a lien on the real property then owned or subsequently acquired by any person against whom the judgment is rendered. Wan, who lived in a distant city, knew nothing of Tent's judgment. Before Tent took any further action, Hal died. The common-law joint tenancy is unmodified by statute. Wan then learned the facts and brought an appropriate action against Tent to quiet title to Blackacre. The court should hold that Tent has 
a lien against the whole of Blackacre, because he was a tenant of both Hal and Wan at the time of the judgment.  a lien against Hal's undivided onehalf interest in Blackacre, because his judgment was filed prior to Hal's death.  no lien, because Wan had no actual notice of Tent's judgment until after Hal's death.  no lien, because Hal's death terminated the interest to which Tent's lien attached. 
Question: Hal and Wan owned Blackacre as joint tenants, upon which was situated a two-family house. Hal lived in one of the two apartments and rented the other apartment to Tent. Hal got in a fight with Tent and injured him. Tent obtained and properly filed a judgment for $10,000 against Hal. The statute in the jurisdiction reads: Any judgment properly filed shall, for ten years from filing, be a lien on the real property then owned or subsequently acquired by any person against whom the judgment is rendered. Wan, who lived in a distant city, knew nothing of Tent's judgment. Before Tent took any further action, Hal died. The common-law joint tenancy is unmodified by statute. Wan then learned the facts and brought an appropriate action against Tent to quiet title to Blackacre. The court should hold that Tent has 
A. a lien against the whole of Blackacre, because he was a tenant of both Hal and Wan at the time of the judgment. 
B. a lien against Hal's undivided onehalf interest in Blackacre, because his judgment was filed prior to Hal's death. 
C. no lien, because Wan had no actual notice of Tent's judgment until after Hal's death. 
D. no lien, because Hal's death terminated the interest to which Tent's lien attached. 
Answer: