A grand jury returned an indictment charging Daniels with bank robbery, and when he could not make bond he was jailed pending trial. He had received Miranda warnings when arrested and had made no statement at that time. The prosecutor arranged to have Innis, an informant, placed as Daniels's cellmate and instructed Innis to find out about the bank robbery without asking any direct questions about it. Innis, once in the cell, constantly boasted about the crimes that he had committed. Not to be outdone, Daniels finally declared that he had committed the bank robbery with which he was charged. At Daniels's trial, his attorney moved to exclude any testimony from Innis concerning Daniels's boast. The motion should be 
granted, because Daniels's privilege against self-incrimination was violated.  granted, because Daniels's right to counsel was violated.  denied, because Daniels had received Miranda warnings.  denied, because Daniels was not interrogated by Innis. 
Question: A grand jury returned an indictment charging Daniels with bank robbery, and when he could not make bond he was jailed pending trial. He had received Miranda warnings when arrested and had made no statement at that time. The prosecutor arranged to have Innis, an informant, placed as Daniels's cellmate and instructed Innis to find out about the bank robbery without asking any direct questions about it. Innis, once in the cell, constantly boasted about the crimes that he had committed. Not to be outdone, Daniels finally declared that he had committed the bank robbery with which he was charged. At Daniels's trial, his attorney moved to exclude any testimony from Innis concerning Daniels's boast. The motion should be 
A. granted, because Daniels's privilege against self-incrimination was violated. 
B. granted, because Daniels's right to counsel was violated. 
C. denied, because Daniels had received Miranda warnings. 
D. denied, because Daniels was not interrogated by Innis. 
Answer: