Dray was prosecuted for bank robbery. At trial, the bank teller, Wall, was unable to identify Dray, now bearded, as the bank robber. The prosecutor then showed Wall a group of photographs, and Wall testified that she had previously told the prosecutor that the middle picture (concededly a picture of Dray before he grew a beard) was a picture of the bank robber. Wall's testimony is
inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception.  inadmissible, because it is a violation of Dray's right of confrontation.  admissible as prior identification by the witness. admissible as past recollection recorded
Question: Dray was prosecuted for bank robbery. At trial, the bank teller, Wall, was unable to identify Dray, now bearded, as the bank robber. The prosecutor then showed Wall a group of photographs, and Wall testified that she had previously told the prosecutor that the middle picture (concededly a picture of Dray before he grew a beard) was a picture of the bank robber. Wall's testimony is
A. inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception. 
B. inadmissible, because it is a violation of Dray's right of confrontation. 
C. admissible as prior identification by the witness.
D. admissible as past recollection recorded
Answer: