Assume that Congress passed and the President signed the following statute: "The appellate jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court shall not extend to any case involving the constitutionality of any state statute limiting the circumstances in which a statute limiting the circumstances in which a woman may obtain an abortion, or involving the constitutionality of this statute." The strongest argument against the constitutionality of this statute is that 
Congress may not exercise its authority over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in a way that seriously interferes with the establishment of a supreme and uniform body of federal constitutional law. Congress may only regulate the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over cases initially arising in federal courts. the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may only be altered by constitutional amendment. the statute violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Question: Assume that Congress passed and the President signed the following statute: "The appellate jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court shall not extend to any case involving the constitutionality of any state statute limiting the circumstances in which a statute limiting the circumstances in which a woman may obtain an abortion, or involving the constitutionality of this statute." The strongest argument against the constitutionality of this statute is that 
A. Congress may not exercise its authority over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in a way that seriously interferes with the establishment of a supreme and uniform body of federal constitutional law.
B. Congress may only regulate the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over cases initially arising in federal courts.
C. the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may only be altered by constitutional amendment.
D. the statute violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Answer: