 Park brought an action against Dan for injuries received in an automobile accident, alleging negligence in that Dan was speeding and inattentive. Park calls White to testify that Dan had a reputation in the community of being a reckless driver and was known as "daredevil Dan." White's testimony is
admissible as habit evidence. admissible, because it tends to prove that Dan was negligent at the time of this collision.  inadmissible, because Dan has not offered testimony of his own good character.  inadmissible to show negligence
Question:  Park brought an action against Dan for injuries received in an automobile accident, alleging negligence in that Dan was speeding and inattentive. Park calls White to testify that Dan had a reputation in the community of being a reckless driver and was known as "daredevil Dan." White's testimony is
A. admissible as habit evidence.
B. admissible, because it tends to prove that Dan was negligent at the time of this collision. 
C. inadmissible, because Dan has not offered testimony of his own good character. 
D. inadmissible to show negligence
Answer: