A statute of the state of Lanape flatly bans the sale or distribution of contraceptive devices to minors. Drugs, Inc., a national retailer of drugs and related items, is charged with violating the Lanape statute. Which of the following is the strongest constitutional argument Drugs, Inc., could make in defending itself against prosecution for violation of this statute?
The statute constitutes an undue burden on interstate commerce. The statute denies minors one of their fundamental rights without due process. The statute denies Drugs, Inc., a privilege or immunity of state citizenship.  The statute violates the First Amendment right to freedom of religion because it regulates morals.
Question: A statute of the state of Lanape flatly bans the sale or distribution of contraceptive devices to minors. Drugs, Inc., a national retailer of drugs and related items, is charged with violating the Lanape statute. Which of the following is the strongest constitutional argument Drugs, Inc., could make in defending itself against prosecution for violation of this statute?
A. The statute constitutes an undue burden on interstate commerce.
B. The statute denies minors one of their fundamental rights without due process.
C. The statute denies Drugs, Inc., a privilege or immunity of state citizenship. 
D. The statute violates the First Amendment right to freedom of religion because it regulates morals.
Answer: