In Polk's negligence action against Dell arising out of a multiple-car collision, Witt testified for Polk that Dell went through a red light. On cross-examination, Dell seeks to question Witt about her statement that the light was yellow, made in a deposition that Witt gave in a separate action between Adams and Baker. The transcript of the deposition is self-authenticating. On proper objection, the court should rule the inquiry 
admissible for impeachment only. admissible as substantive evidence only. admissible for impeachment and as substantive evidence. inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception.
Question: In Polk's negligence action against Dell arising out of a multiple-car collision, Witt testified for Polk that Dell went through a red light. On cross-examination, Dell seeks to question Witt about her statement that the light was yellow, made in a deposition that Witt gave in a separate action between Adams and Baker. The transcript of the deposition is self-authenticating. On proper objection, the court should rule the inquiry 
A. admissible for impeachment only.
B. admissible as substantive evidence only.
C. admissible for impeachment and as substantive evidence.
D. inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception.
Answer: