Prine sued Dover for an assault that occurred March 5 in California. To support his defense that he was in Utah on that date, Dover identifies and seeks to introduce a letter he wrote to his sister a week before the assault in which he stated that he would see her in Utah on March 5. The letter is 
admissible, within the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule.  admissible, as a prior consistent statement to support Dover's credibility as a witness.  inadmissible, because it lacks sufficient probative value.  inadmissible, because it is a statement of belief to prove the fact believed. 
Question: Prine sued Dover for an assault that occurred March 5 in California. To support his defense that he was in Utah on that date, Dover identifies and seeks to introduce a letter he wrote to his sister a week before the assault in which he stated that he would see her in Utah on March 5. The letter is 
A. admissible, within the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. 
B. admissible, as a prior consistent statement to support Dover's credibility as a witness. 
C. inadmissible, because it lacks sufficient probative value. 
D. inadmissible, because it is a statement of belief to prove the fact believed. 
Answer: