Dann, who was charged with the crime of assaulting Smith, admitted striking Smith but claimed to have acted in self-defense when he was attacked by Smith, who was drunk and belligerent after a football game.Dann's friend Frank was called to testify that Smith had a reputation among the people with whom he lived and worked for law-breaking and frequently engaging in brawls. The trial judge should rule the testimony
admissible to support Dann's theory of self-defense, touching on whether Dann or Smith was the aggressor.  admissible if Frank testifies further as to specific acts of misconduct on Smith's part of which Frank has personal knowledge. inadmissible on the question of Dann's guilt because Dann, not Smith, is on trial.  inadmissible, because Frank failed to lay a proper foundation
Question: Dann, who was charged with the crime of assaulting Smith, admitted striking Smith but claimed to have acted in self-defense when he was attacked by Smith, who was drunk and belligerent after a football game.Dann's friend Frank was called to testify that Smith had a reputation among the people with whom he lived and worked for law-breaking and frequently engaging in brawls. The trial judge should rule the testimony
A. admissible to support Dann's theory of self-defense, touching on whether Dann or Smith was the aggressor. 
B. admissible if Frank testifies further as to specific acts of misconduct on Smith's part of which Frank has personal knowledge.
C. inadmissible on the question of Dann's guilt because Dann, not Smith, is on trial. 
D. inadmissible, because Frank failed to lay a proper foundation
Answer: