Dieter parked her car in violation of a city ordinance that prohibits parking within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. Because Grove was driving negligently, his car sideswiped Dieter's parked car. Plaintiff, a passenger in Grove's car, was injured in the collision. If Plaintiff asserts a claim against Dieter to recover damages for his injuries, basing his claim on Dieter's violation of the parking ordinance, will Plaintiff prevail?
Yes, because Dieter was guilty of negligence per se.  Yes, if Plaintiff would not have been injured had Dieter's car not been parked where it was.  No, because Dieter's parked car was not an active or efficient cause of Plaintiff's injury.  No, if prevention of traffic accidents was not a purpose of the ordinance.
Question: Dieter parked her car in violation of a city ordinance that prohibits parking within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. Because Grove was driving negligently, his car sideswiped Dieter's parked car. Plaintiff, a passenger in Grove's car, was injured in the collision. If Plaintiff asserts a claim against Dieter to recover damages for his injuries, basing his claim on Dieter's violation of the parking ordinance, will Plaintiff prevail?
A. Yes, because Dieter was guilty of negligence per se. 
B. Yes, if Plaintiff would not have been injured had Dieter's car not been parked where it was. 
C. No, because Dieter's parked car was not an active or efficient cause of Plaintiff's injury. 
D. No, if prevention of traffic accidents was not a purpose of the ordinance.
Answer: