In a trial to a jury, Owner proved that Power Company's negligent maintenance of a transformer caused a fire that destroyed his restaurant. The jury returned a verdict for Owner in the amount of $450,000 for property loss and $500,000 for emotional distress. The trial judge entered judgment in those amounts. Power Company appealed that part of the judgment awarding $500,000 for emotional distress. On appeal, the judgment should be 
affirmed, because Power Company negligently caused Owner's emotional distress.  affirmed, because harm arising from emotional distress is as real as harm caused by physical impact.  reversed, because the law does not recognize a claim for emotional distress incident to negligently caused property loss.  reversed, unless the jury found that Owner suffered physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by his property loss.
Question: In a trial to a jury, Owner proved that Power Company's negligent maintenance of a transformer caused a fire that destroyed his restaurant. The jury returned a verdict for Owner in the amount of $450,000 for property loss and $500,000 for emotional distress. The trial judge entered judgment in those amounts. Power Company appealed that part of the judgment awarding $500,000 for emotional distress. On appeal, the judgment should be 
A. affirmed, because Power Company negligently caused Owner's emotional distress. 
B. affirmed, because harm arising from emotional distress is as real as harm caused by physical impact. 
C. reversed, because the law does not recognize a claim for emotional distress incident to negligently caused property loss. 
D. reversed, unless the jury found that Owner suffered physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by his property loss.
Answer: