In exchange for a valid and sufficient consideration, Goodbar orally promised Walker, who had no car and wanted a minivan, "to pay to anyone from whom you buy a minivan within the next six months the full purchase-price thereof." Two months later, Walker bought a used minivan on credit from Minivanity Fair, Inc., for $8,000. At the time, Minivanity Fair was unaware of Goodbar's earlier promise to Walker, but learned of it shortly after the sale. Can Minivanity Fair enforce Goodbar's promise to Walker? 
Yes, under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.  Yes, because Minivanity Fair is an intended beneficiary of the GoodbarWalker contract.  No, because Goodbar's promise to Walker is unenforceable under the suretyship clause of the statute of frauds.  No, because Minivanity Fair was neither identified when Goodbar's promise was made nor aware of it when the minivansale was made.
Question: In exchange for a valid and sufficient consideration, Goodbar orally promised Walker, who had no car and wanted a minivan, "to pay to anyone from whom you buy a minivan within the next six months the full purchase-price thereof." Two months later, Walker bought a used minivan on credit from Minivanity Fair, Inc., for $8,000. At the time, Minivanity Fair was unaware of Goodbar's earlier promise to Walker, but learned of it shortly after the sale. Can Minivanity Fair enforce Goodbar's promise to Walker? 
A. Yes, under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. 
B. Yes, because Minivanity Fair is an intended beneficiary of the GoodbarWalker contract. 
C. No, because Goodbar's promise to Walker is unenforceable under the suretyship clause of the statute of frauds. 
D. No, because Minivanity Fair was neither identified when Goodbar's promise was made nor aware of it when the minivansale was made.
Answer: