Rider, a bus passenger, sued Transit Company for injuries to his back from an accident caused by Transit's negligence. Transit denies that Rider received any injury in the accident.Rider's counsel seeks to introduce an affidavit he obtained in preparation for trial from Dr. Bond, who has since died. The affidavit avers that Dr. Bond examined Rider two days after the Transit Company accident and found him suffering from a recently incurred back injury. The judge should rule the affidavit
admissible, as a statement of present bodily condition made to a physician.  admissible, as prior recorded testimony.  inadmissible, because it is irrelevant.  inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception
Question: Rider, a bus passenger, sued Transit Company for injuries to his back from an accident caused by Transit's negligence. Transit denies that Rider received any injury in the accident.Rider's counsel seeks to introduce an affidavit he obtained in preparation for trial from Dr. Bond, who has since died. The affidavit avers that Dr. Bond examined Rider two days after the Transit Company accident and found him suffering from a recently incurred back injury. The judge should rule the affidavit
A. admissible, as a statement of present bodily condition made to a physician. 
B. admissible, as prior recorded testimony. 
C. inadmissible, because it is irrelevant. 
D. inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within any exception
Answer: