National regulation of predatory wild animals on federal lands is most likely
constitutional, because the protection of wild animals is important to the general welfare.  constitutional, because Congress has authority to make regulations respecting federal property.  unconstitutional, because wild animals as defined by state common law are not federal property.  unconstitutional, because regulation and control of wild animals is retained by the states under the Tenth Amendment.
Question: National regulation of predatory wild animals on federal lands is most likely
A. constitutional, because the protection of wild animals is important to the general welfare. 
B. constitutional, because Congress has authority to make regulations respecting federal property. 
C. unconstitutional, because wild animals as defined by state common law are not federal property. 
D. unconstitutional, because regulation and control of wild animals is retained by the states under the Tenth Amendment.
Answer: