Homeowner owns a house on a lake. Neighbor owns a house across a driveway from Homeowner's property. Neighbor's house sits on a hill and Neighbor can see the lake from his living room window. Homeowner and Neighbor got into an argument and Homeowner erected a large spotlight on his property that automatically comes on at dusk and goes off at sunrise. The only reason Homeowner installed the light was to annoy Neighbor. The glare from the light severely detracts from Neighbor's view of the lake. In a suit by Neighbor against Homeowner, will Neighbor prevail? 
Yes, because Homeowner installed the light solely to annoy Neighbor.  Yes, if, and only if, Neighbor's property value is adversely affected.  No, because Neighbor's view of the lake is not always obstructed.  No, if the spotlight provides added security to Homeowner's property. 
Question: Homeowner owns a house on a lake. Neighbor owns a house across a driveway from Homeowner's property. Neighbor's house sits on a hill and Neighbor can see the lake from his living room window. Homeowner and Neighbor got into an argument and Homeowner erected a large spotlight on his property that automatically comes on at dusk and goes off at sunrise. The only reason Homeowner installed the light was to annoy Neighbor. The glare from the light severely detracts from Neighbor's view of the lake. In a suit by Neighbor against Homeowner, will Neighbor prevail? 
A. Yes, because Homeowner installed the light solely to annoy Neighbor. 
B. Yes, if, and only if, Neighbor's property value is adversely affected. 
C. No, because Neighbor's view of the lake is not always obstructed. 
D. No, if the spotlight provides added security to Homeowner's property. 
Answer: