Doe, the governor of State, signed a death warrant for Rend, a convicted murderer. Able and Baker are active opponents of the death penalty. At a demonstration protesting the execution of Rend, Able and Baker carried large signs that stated, "Governor Doe - Murderer." Television station XYZ broadcast news coverage of the demonstration, including pictures of the signs carried by Able and Baker. If Doe asserts against XYZ a claim for damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, will Doe prevail? 
Yes, if the broadcast showing the signs caused Doe to suffer severe emotional distress.  Yes, because the assertion on the signs was extreme and outrageous.  No, unless Doe suffered physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by the signs.  No, because XYZ did not publish a false statement of fact with "actual malice." 
Question: Doe, the governor of State, signed a death warrant for Rend, a convicted murderer. Able and Baker are active opponents of the death penalty. At a demonstration protesting the execution of Rend, Able and Baker carried large signs that stated, "Governor Doe - Murderer." Television station XYZ broadcast news coverage of the demonstration, including pictures of the signs carried by Able and Baker. If Doe asserts against XYZ a claim for damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, will Doe prevail? 
A. Yes, if the broadcast showing the signs caused Doe to suffer severe emotional distress. 
B. Yes, because the assertion on the signs was extreme and outrageous. 
C. No, unless Doe suffered physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by the signs. 
D. No, because XYZ did not publish a false statement of fact with "actual malice." 
Answer: