Owner and his employee, Driver, consult Attorney about a motor vehicle collision resulting in a suit by Litigant against Owner and Driver as joint defendants. Attorney calls Irving, his investigator, into the conference to make notes of what is said, and those present discuss the facts of the collision and Owner's insurance. Owner thereafter files a cross-claim against Driver for indemnity for any damages obtained by LitigantLitigant calls Driver to testify in Litigant's case in chief to admissions made by Owner in the conference. On objection by Owner, the court should rule that Driver's testimony is
admissible, because of the presence of persons in the conference other than Attorney and Owner.  admissible, because Driver is an adverse party in the lawsuit.  inadmissible, because of the attorney-client privilege.  inadmissible, because the best evidence is Irving's notes of the conference
Question: Owner and his employee, Driver, consult Attorney about a motor vehicle collision resulting in a suit by Litigant against Owner and Driver as joint defendants. Attorney calls Irving, his investigator, into the conference to make notes of what is said, and those present discuss the facts of the collision and Owner's insurance. Owner thereafter files a cross-claim against Driver for indemnity for any damages obtained by LitigantLitigant calls Driver to testify in Litigant's case in chief to admissions made by Owner in the conference. On objection by Owner, the court should rule that Driver's testimony is
A. admissible, because of the presence of persons in the conference other than Attorney and Owner. 
B. admissible, because Driver is an adverse party in the lawsuit. 
C. inadmissible, because of the attorney-client privilege. 
D. inadmissible, because the best evidence is Irving's notes of the conference
Answer: