Si was in the act of siphoning gasoline from Neighbor's car in Neighbor's garage and without his consent when the gasoline exploded and a fire followed. Rescuer, seeing the fire, grabbed a fire extinguisher from his car and put out the fire, saving Si's life and Neighbor's car and garage. In doing so, Rescuer was badly burned.If Rescuer asserts a claim against Si for personal injuries, Rescuer will
prevail, because he saved Si's life.  prevail, because Si was at fault in causing the fire.  not prevail, because Rescuer knowingly assumed the risk.  not prevail, because Rescuer's action was not a foreseeable consequence of Si's conduct
Question: Si was in the act of siphoning gasoline from Neighbor's car in Neighbor's garage and without his consent when the gasoline exploded and a fire followed. Rescuer, seeing the fire, grabbed a fire extinguisher from his car and put out the fire, saving Si's life and Neighbor's car and garage. In doing so, Rescuer was badly burned.If Rescuer asserts a claim against Si for personal injuries, Rescuer will
A. prevail, because he saved Si's life. 
B. prevail, because Si was at fault in causing the fire. 
C. not prevail, because Rescuer knowingly assumed the risk. 
D. not prevail, because Rescuer's action was not a foreseeable consequence of Si's conduct
Answer: