Defendant left her car parked on the side of a hill. Two minutes later, the car rolled down the hill and struck and injured Plaintiff. In Plaintiff's negligence action against Defendant, Plaintiff introduced into evidence the facts stated above, which are undisputed. Defendant testified that, when she parked her car, she turned the front wheels into the curb and put on her emergency brakes, which were in good working order. She also introduced evidence that, in the weeks before this incident, juveniles had been seen tampering with cars in the neighborhood. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant, and Plaintiff moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff's motion should be 
granted, because it is more likely than not that Defendant's negligent conduct was the legal cause of Plaintiff's injuries.  granted, because the evidence does not support the verdict.  denied, because, given Defendant's evidence, the jury was not required to draw an inference of negligence from the circumstances of the accident.  denied, if Defendant was in no better position than Plaintiff to explain the accident. 
Question: Defendant left her car parked on the side of a hill. Two minutes later, the car rolled down the hill and struck and injured Plaintiff. In Plaintiff's negligence action against Defendant, Plaintiff introduced into evidence the facts stated above, which are undisputed. Defendant testified that, when she parked her car, she turned the front wheels into the curb and put on her emergency brakes, which were in good working order. She also introduced evidence that, in the weeks before this incident, juveniles had been seen tampering with cars in the neighborhood. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant, and Plaintiff moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff's motion should be 
A. granted, because it is more likely than not that Defendant's negligent conduct was the legal cause of Plaintiff's injuries. 
B. granted, because the evidence does not support the verdict. 
C. denied, because, given Defendant's evidence, the jury was not required to draw an inference of negligence from the circumstances of the accident. 
D. denied, if Defendant was in no better position than Plaintiff to explain the accident. 
Answer: