When a defense lawyer noted that the professor’s written statement to the court was identical to a document prepared by the Moscow Patriarchate, the professor admitted that some parts were the same, word for word.
Kad advokāte norādīja, ka profesora rakstiskais atzinums tiesai ir identisks ar kādu Maskavas patriarhāta sagatavotu dokumentu, profesors piekrita, ka dažas to daļas sakrīt vārds vārdā.