Thus the Boucher case decided that what Jehovah’s Witnesses were saying was lawful; but the Saumur decision established how and where it could be said.
Jadi, dalam kasus Boucher diputuskan bahwa apa yang Saksi - Saksi Yehuwa katakan tidak melanggar hukum; tetapi keputusan Saumur meneguhkan bagaimana dan di mana itu dapat dikatakan.