The Court argued: “Despite recognition of these interests as legitimate, our precedent is clear that there must be a balance between these interests and the effect of the regulations on First Amendment rights. ”
Mahkamah berargumen, ” Meskipun kami mengakui bahwa perasaan cemas seperti itu masuk akal, preseden kami memperlihatkan dengan jelas bahwa harus ada keseimbangan antara perasaan cemas tersebut dan dampak peraturan itu terhadap hak - hak Amandemen Pertama. ”