The wording of the decision shows that this case was not about money, for it read: “Refusing to recognize a religious association, bringing about its dissolution, the use of derogatory language toward a religious movement, are all examples of interference with the right guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention. ”
न्यायालयाने दिलेल्या निकालात म्हटले, की फ्रान्सच्या सरकारने युरोपियन करारातील, धार्मिक स्वातंत्र्याचे संरक्षण करणाऱ्‍या ९ व्या कलमाचे उल्लंघन केले होते.