['< sod >\'\'\'logical consequence\'\'\'( also\'\'\'entailment\'\'\') is a fundamental [ [ concept ] ] in [ [ logic ] ], which describes the relationship between [ [ statement ( logic ) | statement ] ] s that holds true when one statement logically\'\' follows from\'\' one or more statements. a [ [ validity | valid ] ] logical [ [ argument ] ] is one in which the [ [ consequent | conclusions ] ] follow from the [ [ premise ] ] s, because the conclusions are consequences of the premises. the [ [ philosophical analysis ] ] of logical consequence involves the questions : in what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and what does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? < ref name = " sep " > beall, jc and restall, greg,\'\' [ http : / / plato. stanford. edu / archives / fall2009 / entries / logical - consequence / logical consequence ]\'\' the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ( fall 2009 edition ), edward n. zalta ( ed. ). < / ref > all of [ [ philosophical logic ] ] is meant to provide accounts of the nature of logical consequence and the nature of [ [ logical truth ] ]. < ref > [ [ willard van orman quine | quine, willard van orman ] ],\'\' philosophy of logic\'\'. < / ref > < eod > < sod >\'\'\'logical consequence\'\'\'( also\'\'\'entailment\'\'\') is a fundamental [ [ concept ] ] in [ [ logic ] ], which describes the relationship between [ [ statement ( logic ) | statement ] ] s that holds true when one statement logically\'\' follows from\'\' one or more statements. a [ [ validity | valid ] ] logical [ [ argument ] ] is one in which the [ [ consequent | conclusions ] ] entail from the [ [ premise ] ] s, because the conclusions are consequences of the premises. the [ [ philosophical analysis ] ] of logical consequence involves the questions : in what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and what does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? < ref name = " sep " > beall, jc and restall, greg,\'\' [ http : / / plato. stanford. edu / archives / 2013 fall2009 / entries / logical - consequence / logical consequence ]\'\' the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ( fall 2009 edition ), edward n. zalta ( ed. ). < / ref > all of [ [ philosophical logic ] ] is meant to provide accounts of the nature of logical consequence and the nature of [ [ logical truth ] ]. < ref > [ [ willard van orman quine | quine, willard van orman ] ],\'\' philosophy of logic\'\'. < / ref > < eod >']