<sod>  
 I would like to create a wikipedia in [[Low Saxon]], which is spoken by more than 1 million people but is not listed with a code in iso-639. Would it be possible to set up a Low Saxon version?
 
:Why does Volapuk have a code and can have its own version when there are like 30 people who speak it and things like [[Low Saxon]] and [[Pennsylvania German]] don't have codes and can't have a Wikipedia? Doesn't make sense to me. Of course it's not Wikipedia's fault it doensn't have an ISO code. <eod> <sod> 
 I would like to create a wikipedia in [[Low Saxon]], which is spoken by more than 1 million people but is not listed with a code in iso-639. Would it be possible to set up a Low Saxon version?
 
:Why does Volapuk have a code and can have its own version when there are like 30 people who speak it and things like [[Low Saxon]] and [[Pennsylvania German]] don't have codes and can't have a Wikipedia? Doesn't make sense to me. Of course it's not Wikipedia's fault it doensn't have an ISO code.

:: The projects' goal is roughly the creation of an authoritative general compedium of the sum human knowledge in all languages,  Nobel Goal. Nothing stops you from choosing the lingustically correct title. I think in my retirement I might create syllabaries of languages that don't yet have a written form. But nothing changes the convention established about the naming of entries based on search engine results expected by average users. I think that linguistic project to examine the teaching possibilities of Esperanto would have untold side effects for this GNU DocL project. Please leave me a message 132, I am Heartfelt when I say that I always wanted an esperanto freind. [[Two16]] <eod>