<sod>Many movie enthusiasts prefer PAL over NTSC despite the former's speed-up, because the latter results in [[Telecine#Telecine judder|telecine judder]], a visual distortion not present in PAL sped-up video.<ref name="Enthusiasts">[http://web.archive.org/web/20060114015926/http://www.dvdlard.co.uk/Content.aspx?ContentID=109 DVDLard] www.dvdlard.co.uk</ref> states ''"the majority of authorities on the subject favour PAL over NTSC for DVD playback quality"''. Also DVD reviewers often make mention of this cause. For example, in his PAL vs. NTSC article,<ref name=pal-v-ntsc>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Articles/PALvsNTSC/PALvsNTSC.asp |title=PAL vs. NTSC |website=www.michaeldvd.com.au |author=Demtschyna, Michael |date=7 July 2000 |accessdate=30 November 2014}}</ref> the founder of  MichaelDVD says: ''"Personally, I find [3:2 pulldown] all but intolerable and find it very hard to watch a movie on an NTSC DVD because of it."'' In the DVD review of [[Frequency (film)|''Frequency'']],<ref name=freq-review>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Reviews/Reviews.asp?ID=3999 |title=DVD review ''Frequency'' (2000) - R4 vs R1  |website=www.michaeldvd.com.au |author=Williams, Paul |date=28 January 2001|accessdate=30 November 2014}}</ref> one of his reviewers mentions: ''"because of the 3:2 pull-down artefacts that are associated with the NTSC format (…) I prefer PAL pretty much any day of the week"''. This is not an issue on modern [[Video scaler|upconverting]] DVD players and [[personal computers]], as they play back 23.97 frame/s–encoded video at its true frame rate, without 3:2 pulldown.<eod>
<sod>Many movie enthusiasts prefer PAL over NTSC despite the former's speed-up, because the latter results in [[Telecine#Telecine judder|telecine judder]], a visual distortion not present in PAL sped-up video.<ref name="Enthusiasts">[https://web.archive.org/web/20060114015926/http://www.dvdlard.co.uk/Content.aspx?ContentID=109 DVDLard] www.dvdlard.co.uk</ref> states ''"the majority of authorities on the subject favour PAL over NTSC for DVD playback quality"''. Also DVD reviewers often make mention of this cause. For example, in his PAL vs. NTSC article,<ref name=pal-v-ntsc>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Articles/PALvsNTSC/PALvsNTSC.asp |title=PAL vs. NTSC |website=www.michaeldvd.com.au |author=Demtschyna, Michael |date=7 July 2000 |accessdate=30 November 2014}}</ref> the founder of  MichaelDVD says: ''"Personally, I find [3:2 pulldown] all but intolerable and find it very hard to watch a movie on an NTSC DVD because of it."'' In the DVD review of [[Frequency (film)|''Frequency'']],<ref name=freq-review>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Reviews/Reviews.asp?ID=3999 |title=DVD review ''Frequency'' (2000) - R4 vs R1  |website=www.michaeldvd.com.au |author=Williams, Paul |date=28 January 2001|accessdate=30 November 2014}}</ref> one of his reviewers mentions: ''"because of the 3:2 pull-down artefacts that are associated with the NTSC format (…) I prefer PAL pretty much any day of the week"''. This is not an issue on modern [[Video scaler|upconverting]] DVD players and [[personal computers]], as they play back 23.97 frame/s–encoded video at its true frame rate, without 3:2 pulldown.<eod>