R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd
... that in R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd the Victorian Court of Appeal held that workers do not need to be employed by a company to hold it liable for safety violations?
... that in <i id="mwVA"><b id="mwVQ"><a href="./R_v_ACR_Roofing_Pty_Ltd" id="mwVg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd">R v ACR Roofing Pty Ltd</a></b></i> the <a href="./Supreme_Court_of_Victoria" id="mwVw" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Supreme Court of Victoria">Victorian Court of Appeal</a> held that workers do not need to be employed by a company to hold it liable for safety violations?