Wiggins v. Smith
...that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1963 that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to "effective" legal counsel, but "effective" was not defined until Wiggins v. Smith in 2003?
...that the <a class="mw-redirect" href="./United_States_Supreme_Court" id="mwCr8" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="United States Supreme Court">U.S. Supreme Court</a> <a href="./Gideon_v._Wainwright" id="mwCsA" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Gideon v. Wainwright">ruled in 1963</a> that a <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Criminal" id="mwCsE" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Criminal">criminal</a> <a href="./Defendant" id="mwCsI" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Defendant">defendant</a> has a <a class="mw-redirect" href="./U.S._Constitution" id="mwCsM" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="U.S. Constitution">constitutional right</a> to <a href="./Lawyer" id="mwCsQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Lawyer">"effective" legal counsel</a>, but "<a class="mw-redirect" href="./Effective" id="mwCsU" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Effective">effective</a>" was not defined until <i id="mwCsY"><b id="mwCsc"><a href="./Wiggins_v._Smith" id="mwCsg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Wiggins v. Smith">Wiggins v. Smith</a></b></i> in 2003?