Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the XXXX .

@entity1 @entity548 @entity604 @entity5386 @entity737
AIM: To compare the long-term clinical outcome of turned vs. moderately rough implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: @entity1 treated with implants in the edentulous mandible and/or maxilla were invited for a clinical examination. After prosthesis removal, the pocket depth was measured and the @entity548 scored. Also, a new radiograph was taken for @entity604 evaluation. @entity1 were also requested to rate their satisfaction with the treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven implants in 33 @entity1 were evaluated. After a mean follow-up of 172  months (SD 42, range 120-252), the mean loss was 1.61  mm (SD 1.35, range 0.00-8.25). @entity604 was higher in the maxilla compared to the mandible (P  <  0.001), and at implants, that was restored on implant level (P  =  0.003). Multivariate analyses demonstrated a significant effect of implant surface roughness and time of loading on @entity604 . Smoking, on the other hand, did not affect the outcome. Mean pocket probing depth was 3.64  mm (SD 0.96, range 1.25-7.25). A total of 4.1% of the implants demonstrated signs of @entity737 . The overall @entity1 satisfaction rate was 98.5%. CONCLUSION: Implant treatment in the @entity5386 has a predictable long-term outcome with limited complications.
