Management of XXXX .

@entity1318 @entity1 @entity3509 @entity7261 @entity354 @entity4423
@entity7261 are very rarely seen and are often associated with @entity1318 , @entity4423 , and a high resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different treatment options for @entity1 with @entity7261 . @entity1 with an @entity7261 were divided into two treatment groups: surgical and nonsurgical. Retrospective chart review was performed, and a symptom questionnaire was created. There were six @entity1 in the nonsurgical group and 11 @entity1 in the surgical group. The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Ten @entity1 had a laparoscopic operation performed. One @entity1 was operated on thoracoscopically and had to be converted to a thoracotomy. Two diverticula were inverted with good results. There was one postoperative esophageal leak where no myotomy was added. An @entity3509 developed in another @entity1 at 4 weeks after surgery. One @entity1 , in whom no antireflux procedure was performed, reported postoperative heartburn. @entity1 in the nonsurgical group had smaller diverticula, were not good candidates for surgery, or were asymptomatic. Esophageal diverticula are very rarely seen. Asymptomatic @entity1 may not require therapy. If surgery is performed and the diverticulum is large, it should be removed. The laparoscopic approach is the surgical treatment of choice. A long myotomy and an antireflux procedure should be added to avoid esophageal leakage at the line of repair and @entity354 .
