Intraoperative XXXX during carotid artery stenting: A case report and literature review.

@entity1 @entity932 @entity510 @entity1294 @entity2998 @entity10 @entity51 @entity583 @entity850 @entity1779
UNASSIGNED: @entity2998 ( @entity2998 ) has a fatal complication of @entity932 ( @entity932 ) associated with @entity1779 ( @entity1779 ), i.e. @entity932 and @entity510 ( @entity510 ). Although @entity510 accounts for a small percentage of these @entity1 , it is difficult to make a differential diagnosis of this syndrome from @entity1779 without @entity932 because the clinical presentations resemble each other. Furthermore, not only does the cause of @entity510 following @entity2998 remain unclear but also the role of controlling postoperative blood pressure is not detected in preventing @entity932 after @entity2998 . Herein, we report a case of @entity510 following @entity2998 and review previous literature to discuss the mechanism and the management of this fatal complication. A 78-year-old @entity1 with a history of @entity1294 and @entity583 was referred to our department for intervention to asymptomatic severe @entity850 of the right internal carotid artery. We performed @entity2998 under local anesthesia. Although her blood pressure was controlled to normotension during the procedure, the @entity1 complained of @entity10 following predilation. Postoperative emergent non-contrast computed tomography revealed @entity510 with leakage of contrast medium occupying the right sylvian fissure. We continued strict blood pressure control, and the @entity1 was discharged without any @entity51 . A well-opened lumen of the stent was recognized three months later at the outpatient visit. Strict control of intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure may improve the outcome of @entity510 following @entity2998 though the role in preventing @entity932 after @entity2998 is unclear.
