XXXX after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for @entity322 : a randomized controlled trial.

@entity1 @entity282 @entity322 @entity158
OBJECTIVE: To compare @entity282 scores and assess efficacy between an adjustable single-incision sling and a standard transobturator sling for stress @entity322 (SUI). METHODS: This single-blinded randomized controlled trial involved 156 @entity1 with clinically proven SUI. @entity1 were allocated to receive either an adjustable single-incision or a transobturator sling. The primary outcome was @entity282 score on a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were objective and subjective cure rates at 12 months, symptom bother scores, quality of life, and complications. RESULTS: The mean @entity158 score in the first week postoperatively was significantly lower at all time points in the adjustable single-incision sling group compared with the transobturator sling group. Maximum difference in @entity158 score was reported on the evening of the day of surgery; median @entity158 score was 1.0 (interquartile range 2.0) in the adjustable sling group and 3.0 (interquartile range 4.5) in the transobturator sling group (Mann Whitney U test P<.001). There was no statistical difference in analgesic use. The objective cure rates in the adjustable single-incision sling and in the transobturator sling group were 90.8% and 88.6% (P=.760), and the subjective cure rates were 77.2% and 72.9% (P=.577), respectively. No difference in the complication rate was found. CONCLUSION: An adjustable single-incision sling for the treatment of SUI is associated with lower early @entity282 scores but shows comparable cure rates with a transobturator at 12 months of follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, http://www.trialregister.nl, NTR: 2558. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : I.
