Interprofessional analysis of XXXX from long head biceps tenotomy.

@entity1 @entity85 @entity28
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perception of an @entity85 resultant from arthroscopic long head biceps (LHB) tenotomy according to the degree of experience of the assisting professional. METHODS: 120 @entity1 submitted to shoulder surgery were photographed and photos were mounted in a PowerPoint presentation. Three shoulder specialist surgeons, three generalist orthopedic surgeons and three graduated residents analyzed the presentation. RESULTS: On all @entity1 we observed most agreement among the shoulder specialists. When just the @entity1 with LHB tenotomy were analyzed, the specialists agreed moderately, the generalists had small agreement and the residents, a poor one. Analyzing @entity1 with BMI < 30, there was major agreement between the specialists, while the generalists and residents had poor agreement. Analyzing @entity1 with BMI >=  30, the generalists had small kappa agreement, while the specialists and residents had no agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of an @entity85 regarding a LHB tenotomy did not have significant agreement between different level of professionals, even though the specialists showed similar perception on tenotomy @entity1 . The evaluation of @entity28 @entity1 lowered the agreement on the three groups of professionals. Level of Evidence III. Case Control Study.
