Agreement between static magnetic resonance urography and diuretic renal scintigraphy in @entity1 with XXXX after pyeloplasty.

@entity1 @entity3041 @entity1297 @entity4145
BACKGROUND: @entity4145 ( @entity4145 ) is the most common cause of @entity3041 within childhood that usually treat by surgery. According to anatomical variations in different individuals, scheduling similar procedures for all @entity1 is not suitable, and thus the best decision for an appropriate surgical technique should be considered separately for each @entity1 . Regardless of the type of applied technique, creating a funnel-shape UPJ with a suitable size is a successful treatment. In this context, the assessment of a successful surgical treatment in a short-term follow-up means repairing revealed anatomical defects. The present study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of static magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and @entity1297 ( @entity1297 ) in @entity1 with @entity4145 after pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive @entity1 with @entity4145 , who underwent unilateral pyeloplasty between 2012 and 2013 were assessed. All subjects underwent @entity1297 and also MRU about 1-month after the former procedure. RESULTS: The Kendall's tau correlation showed a very strong correlation between results of MRU and diuretic renal scintigraphy (r = 0.932, P < 0.001). This strong correlation was also shown by Somers'd test (r = 0.932, P < 0.001) similarly. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a strong agreement between @entity1297 and MRU to assess @entity4145 . MRU static fluid has a high accuracy for assessment of renal system anatomy. Due to the lack of dangerous consequences of contrast materials, MRU can be the best option instead of @entity1297 .
