Percutaneous @entity3574 with @entity691 mesh and allograft bone for XXXX .

@entity691 @entity1 @entity174 @entity3574 @entity158
Purpose. In cases of @entity174 , percutaneous @entity3574 can be used in addition to posterior stabilisation. The use of an augmentation technique with a bone-filled @entity691 mesh as a stand-alone treatment for traumatic vertebral fractures has not yet been investigated. Methods. In this retrospective study, 17 @entity1 with acute type A3.1 fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine underwent stand-alone augmentation with mesh and allograft bone and were followed up for one year using @entity158 scales and sagittal endplate angles. Results. From before surgery to 12 months after surgery, @entity158 and physical function improved significantly, as indicated by an improvement in the median VAS score and in the median @entity158 and work scale scores. From before to immediately after surgery, all @entity1 showed a significant improvement in mean mono- and bisegmental kyphoses. During the one-year period, there was a significant loss of correction. Conclusions. Based on this data a stand-alone approach with @entity3574 with @entity691 mesh and allograft bone is not a suitable therapy option for incomplete @entity174 for a young @entity1 collective.
