XXXX and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

@entity1 @entity323
INTRODUCTION: Penile prostheses are subject to a continuous development and have gained better mechanical reliability and safety during the last decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes and satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and semirigid penile prosthesis (SPP) implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2001 to June 2012, 257 @entity1 with @entity323 ( @entity323 ) underwent penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) at our institution. Of the 257 @entity1 , 118 underwent implantation of IPP and 139 underwent SPP implantation. The pre-operative and post-operative erectile status of the @entity1 were assessed by international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. The satisfaction of @entity1 and partners were evaluated by a telephone interview using the @entity323 inventory of treatment satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and EDITS partner survey. RESULTS: The overall major complication rate was higher in IPP group. PPI led to a significant improvement in IIEF scores in both groups. For IPP and SPP groups the average EDITS scores were 78  11and 57  8, respectively, and that for the partners were 72  10 and 49  7, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the IPP implantation have better satisfaction rates, the SPP implantation is still a viable treatment option in the surgical treatment of @entity323 because of low cost and high durability with acceptable satisfaction rates.
