[Association between negative emotion and interpersonal sensitivity among XXXX in @entity284 maintenance treatment].

@entity1 @entity308 @entity148 @entity284
OBJECTIVE: To analyze interpersonal sensitivity level and influencing factors among @entity1 in @entity284 maintenance treatment. METHODS: From 2010 June to 2011 June, the research was performed in Center of @entity284 Maintenance Treatment of Nanjing Baixia District Hospital. A total of 272 @entity284 maintenance treatment was studied using a self-designed questionnaire, interpersonal sensitivity scale in symptom check list (SCL-90), self-rating @entity308 scale (SDS), @entity148 ( @entity148 ). If interpersonal sensitivity level >=  2 points, it was positive. In this study, through independent sample t test, analysis of the social demographic characteristics, @entity308 and @entity148 , interpersonal sensitivity level. Non conditional logistic regression analysis was used to explore a variety of factors, and the relationship of these factors with interpersonal sensitivity. RESULTS: The @entity308 score, the @entity148 score and the level of interpersonal relationship sensitivity in 272 @entity284 maintenance treatment (1.65    0.51, 47.66    8.58, 42.38    9.40) was higher than the national norm (1.65    0.51, 41.88    10.57, 29.78    0.46) (t values were 8.23, 17.63 and 22.27, respectively; all P values < 0.001). In 272 @entity284 maintenance treatment, the percentage of @entity1 was 75.0% (204/272) and the percentage of @entity1 was 25.0% (68/272). SDS score of male and female was (48.38    8.30) and (45.90    9.34) points (t = 5.67, P = 0.037); Aged 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 and >=  50 years old group, SDS scores were (48.26    7.59), (47.73    8.38), (47.79    9.22) and (48.09    6.33) points (F = 3.90, P = 0.046); According to the drug's time, divided into 1-3, 4-6 and >=  7 years group, SDS scores were (45.92    7.47), (47.41    7.57) and (48.07    8.57) points (F = 4.49, = 0.039). @entity148 score of male and female was (41.21    9.53) and (42.91    9.42) points (t = 2.23, P = 0.043). The positive rate of interpersonal sensitivity was 47.1% (128/272). Multivariate analysis showed that, with SDS and @entity148 scores increased by 1, respectively, interpersonal sensitivity increased 23.23 (8.62-96.68) and 11.97 (6.42-19.27) points. CONCLUSION: Interpersonal sensitivity level in @entity284 maintenance treatment was higher than normal and @entity308 ; @entity148 and @entity308 both were the risk factors of interpersonal sensitivity level.
