The impact of @entity6100 on the risk of @entity1277 in XXXX exposed to @entity1004 .

@entity1 @entity6100 @entity1004 @entity148 @entity1277 @entity2613 @entity285
BACKGROUND: @entity1277 ( @entity1277 ) are often found among @entity1 exposed to @entity1004 ( @entity1004 ). The role of @entity6100 ( @entity6100 ) as a protective factor against @entity2613 among @entity1004 -exposed @entity1 is not firmly established. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the distribution of risk of @entity1277 among @entity1 exposed to @entity1004 and to examine the impact of @entity6100 on risk of @entity2613 among @entity1004 -exposed @entity1 . METHODS: @entity1 (aged 18-64 years) exposed to @entity1004 during their lifetimes (defined by the Humiliation-Afraid-Rape-Kick instrument) were recruited from primary care and domestic violence service agencies and surveyed on demographics, mood/ @entity148 , psychosocial/community factors, and strategies used in response to @entity1004 . The Eating Disorder Screen for Primary Care assessed the risk of @entity2613 . A modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey assessed overall functional support (scale range: 0-32; categorized into quartiles). Ordinal logistic regression examined the risk of @entity2613 based on @entity6100 , controlling for prespecified demographics (age, race/ethnicity, marital status, near-poverty level), and health-related factors significant in bivariate analyses (risky @entity285 use). RESULTS: Among 302 @entity1 with lifetime @entity1004 , 41 (14%) were at high risk, 127 (42%) were at moderate risk, and 134 (44%) were at low risk of an @entity2613 . In bivariate analyses, high risk of an @entity2613 was significantly more frequent among @entity1 with a low @entity6100 score (<19, 24%) versus a high @entity6100 score (>= 30, 12%) (P=0.03). High risk of an @entity2613 was significantly associated with risky @entity285 use (18%) versus non-risky @entity285 use (13%; P=0.008). In multivariable analysis, a 5-unit increase in overall @entity6100 was significantly associated with decreased odds of @entity2613 risk (P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Among @entity1004 -exposed @entity1 , low @entity6100 is associated with an increased risk of @entity2613 . @entity6100 may protect against @entity2613 by reducing @entity148 and promoting positive actions, but further study is needed to confirm this.
