[Bilateral @entity1829 in young XXXX : two case reports of @entity5576 ?].

@entity1 @entity227 @entity1214 @entity101 @entity28 @entity3791 @entity391 @entity1829 @entity5564 @entity10 @entity50 @entity5576 @entity617 @entity6248
We report two cases of @entity1829 in young @entity1 . The first @entity1 was 15 years old and had experienced @entity10 and @entity391 for one month, but no @entity227 . Cerebral tomodensitometry results were normal, but lumbar puncture showed increased pressure and normal biology. Benign intracranial @entity101 was diagnosed. Recent treatment with @entity1214 for acne @entity6248 was the only etiology. @entity1829 was totally regressed at 6 weeks, after interruption of the antibiotic treatment. A prescription of @entity3791 was added for a short period of 10 days. The second @entity1 , aged 29 years, presented @entity1829 with severe @entity227 , with vision limited to light perception with @entity5564 of the right eye. Lumbar puncture was not indicated because of a hypophyseal microadenoma revealed on MRI investigation. No other associated abnormalities were observed, in particular, no @entity50 . Corticotherapy using @entity617 for 72 hours had no clinical effect. Fast visual recovery was obtained with intravenous @entity3791 therapy and was completely resolved at 2 months. Right @entity227 persisted. @entity1214 and @entity28 are recognized as precipitating factors in @entity5576 . The literature advocates consideration of surgical treatment by optic nerve sheath fenestration if antiedematous treatment has no effect and the eye is nearly blind.
