Attention in XXXX and in @entity716 .

@entity1 @entity146 @entity71 @entity262 @entity161 @entity716 @entity302 @entity4764
The adaptive behavior of @entity1 beings is usually supported by rapid monitoring of outstanding events in the environment. Some investigators have suggested that a primary @entity71 might trigger symptoms of @entity161 . In addition, researchers have long discussed the relationship between @entity161 and the @entity716 ( @entity716 ). On the basis of these considerations, the objective of the present study was to investigate attention performance of @entity1 with both disorders. @entity1 age was 18 to 60 years, and all @entity1 had received formal schooling for at least four years. @entity1 were excluded if they had any @entity262 with neurologic or @entity146 comorbidity, or a history of brain surgery. The computer-assisted TAVIS-2R test was applied to all @entity1 and to a control group to evaluate and discriminate between selective, alternating and sustained attention. The TAVIS-2R test is divided into three parts: one for selective attention (5 min), the second for alternating attention (5 min), and the third for the evaluation of vigilance or sustained attention (10 min). The same computer software was used for statistical analysis of reaction time, omission errors, and commission errors. The sample consisted of 36 @entity1 with @entity161 , 28 with interictal @entity716 , and 47 healthy controls. The results of the selective attention tests for both @entity1 groups were significantly lower than that for controls. The @entity1 with @entity161 and @entity716 performed differently in the alternating and sustained attention tests: @entity1 with @entity716 had alternating @entity71 , whereas @entity1 with @entity161 showed @entity71 . These quantitative results confirmed the qualitative clinical observations for both @entity1 groups, that is, that @entity1 with @entity161 had @entity4764 in focusing attention, whereas those with @entity302 showed perseveration in attention focus.
