Treatment of XXXX : parent @entity432 or stent-assisted coiling.

@entity432 @entity1 @entity439 @entity63
UNASSIGNED: Purpose: Treatment of @entity439 is a challenge for neurologists. Previously, parent @entity432 was the classic therapy; now the stent-assisted coil embolization has become available in recent years, but the optimal therapy is under debate. The goal of the present study was to compare two endovascular treatment modalities in terms of safety, efficacy and short-term outcomes. Methods: All the @entity1 were divided into two groups: Group A: @entity1 who underwent parent @entity432 , and Group B: @entity1 who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization. Follow-up outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: After 12 months of follow-up, the favorable outcome (mRS: 0-2) had no statistical significance in both groups (p = 1.00). @entity1 in group A had greater @entity63 compared with @entity1 in group B, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.421). In group B, @entity1 had a higher rate of partial occlusion (p = 0.255) and recurrence (10% vs. 0%; p = 0.586). Conclusions: Stent-assisted coiling may not be superior to parent @entity432 in selected @entity1 after short-term follow-up. Parent @entity432 is a simple, safe and effective treatment for large/giant internal carotid @entity439 .
