[Automobile drivers with XXXX - a prospective analysis].

@entity1 @entity227 @entity6 @entity262 @entity989 @entity1020
BACKGROUND: The study was designed to prospectively evaluate the driving habits of @entity1 with @entity989 , who were referred to the specialised retinal ambulatory care center of the Landesaugenklinik Salzburg. The main purpose of this study was to compare the legal requirements for visual acuity, as currently valid in Austria and Germany for driving motor vehicles, with the results found in this @entity1 cohort and to analyse driving patterns of the @entity1 with valid licenses. With these data, it seems possible to suggest a suitable time for a legally mandatory eye examination as to identify subjects with a potentially rising higher accident risk when driving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 100 @entity1 - all holders of a valid driving licence - with @entity6 or age related @entity1020 were enrolled. From each @entity1 , the visual acuity (corrected or uncorrected depending on the driving habit) was recorded and a detailed questionnaire regarding the actual driving habits was requested. The resulting data were analysed in view of the legal requirements of both countries, Austria and Germany. RESULTS: Of 100 @entity1 holding a valid driving licence a total of 31 were driving their motor vehicles with a legally insufficient visual acuity, 26 of 50 still driving. Of 50 @entity1 suffering from @entity6 , 26 drove their cars illegally. Only 4 out of the above mentioned 31 @entity1 had received sufficient information from their referring ophthalmologists. The average age of "illegal" drivers was 66.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Within the European Community common legal requirements for driving a motor vehicle (regarding mainly the visual acuity) be clearly defined and a mandatory eye exam performed by qualified ophthalmologists for older subjects should be postulated. An individual and age related time limit to be placed on the driving licences of @entity1 suffering from @entity262 associated with relevant @entity227 should to be discussed. Furthermore, ophthalmologists should be obliged to give detailed information to the @entity1 with adequate documentation.
