[Conduction XXXX and phonemic disorder].

@entity1 @entity73 @entity2026 @entity244
Conduction @entity2026 is usually described as a @entity73 . Semiology or pathophysiology cannot be explained with this definition. We report a single case particularly demonstrative. The @entity1 showed spontaneous speech, denomination, repetition and @entity73 . Main errors were phonemic paraphasia. No arthric @entity73 was observed. Damage of supramarginalis gyrus and @entity244 was found. A cognitive analysis suggested that the phonological buffer and the working memory were impaired. Implication for rehabilitation, which included segmentation and semantisation associated to phonological training, is discussed. The course of the conduction @entity2026 was good and the @entity1 was able to work again.
