Comparison between the perioperative results of single-access and @entity7617 in XXXX .

@entity1 @entity7617 @entity5 @entity190 @entity188 @entity302 @entity158
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery for @entity5 has low rates of morbidity and mortality and achieves comparable pathologic outcomes. With improved instruments and surgical techniques, many surgeons have recently begun using @entity302 ( @entity302 ) to minimize scars and @entity158 . Since 2011, most reports of @entity302 for @entity5 have shown comparable pathologic outcomes to those of @entity7617 ( @entity7617 ). However, @entity302 is said to be superior to @entity7617 in reducing complications, producing less discomfort, and faster recovery rates. This study aimed to compare the technical feasibility and early postoperative outcomes of these approaches. METHODS: From January 2011 to January 2014, 78 cases of @entity188 and anal canal were enrolled in the study. Anterior, low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resections were performed. Data collected included technical feasibility and outcomes of operation, such as morbidity, mortality, severity of @entity158 , analgesic usage, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: @entity302 was performed on 35 @entity1 , and @entity7617 was performed in 36 cases. Demographic data, including age, sex, BMI, ASA classification and clinical staging, were similar between the groups. Operative time, @entity190 , and conversion rate were similar (P   >   0.05). Postoperatively, the only significant difference between the groups was @entity158 score, which was significantly lower in the @entity302 group (P   <   0.001). CONCLUSION: @entity302 and @entity7617 for @entity5 had the same intraoperative, pathologic, and early postoperative results. However, @entity302 @entity1 had slightly better @entity158 scores in the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively.
