First-Trimester Use of Selective @entity750 -Reuptake Inhibitors and the Risk of XXXX .

@entity903 @entity3885 @entity1757 @entity600 @entity3756 @entity750 @entity299
UNASSIGNED: First-Trimester Use of Selective @entity750 -Reuptake Inhibitors and the Risk of @entity600 Original Article, N Engl J Med 2007;356:2675-2683. In the Abstract (page 2675), the second sentence of Results should have read, "Analyses of the associations between individual SSRIs and specific defects showed significant associations between the use of @entity3756 and omphalocele (odds ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 20.7; 3 exposed subjects) and between the use of @entity903 and right ventricular outflow @entity3885 (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 8.8; 6 exposed subjects)," rather than ".  .  . and omphalocele (odds ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 20.7; 3 exposed subjects) and @entity1757 (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0; 13 exposed subjects) and between the use of @entity903 .  .  . ." In the third paragraph of the "Assessment of Previous Hypotheses" subsection of Results (page 2678), the second sentence should have ended, ".  .  . ranged from 0.5 to 3.3, and one risk estimate had lower bounds that exceeded 1.0: @entity903 in relation to right ventricular .  .  . ," rather than ".  .  . 3.3, and two risk estimates had lower bounds that exceeded 1.0: @entity3756 in relation to @entity1757 (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0, based on 13 exposed subjects) and @entity903 in relation to right ventricular .  .  . ." In Table 2 (page 2679), the 95% confidence interval given for @entity1757 in the " @entity3756 " column should have been "(1.0-4.0)," rather than "(1.2-4.0)." In the second paragraph of the Discussion, the first parenthetical in the second sentence (page 2680) should have read, "(odds ratio, 2.0; lower confidence bound, 1.0)," rather than "(odds ratio, 2.0)." In the first sentence of the third paragraph (page 2680), the term "selected @entity299 " should have been "selected defects." In the fifth paragraph, the final sentence (page 2681) should have ended, ".  .  . neither of which was common to both drugs," rather than ".  .  . none of which were common .  .  . ." The article is correct at NEJM.org.
