@entity9496 and XXXX . A single disorder?

@entity1 @entity308 @entity10420 @entity146 @entity9496
@entity10420 and @entity9496 have been thought to represent a single condition. Different clinical presentations for the disorders have been attributed to cultural stereotyping and diagnostic bias. The present study carefully examines detailed @entity146 histories taken from 560 nonpatient university students. Diagnoses of @entity10420 and @entity9496 are based on the diagnostic criteria for @entity146 research of Feighner et al. Interviewer bias is avoided. Both disorders were present in both sexes. @entity9496 was more common for women, whereas @entity10420 occurred more frequently in @entity1 . The two disorders presented with nearly equal frequency in @entity1 . @entity9496 was more frequent and @entity10420 was less frequent in @entity1 than in @entity1 . The two disorders were associated for @entity1 but not for @entity1 . Specific symptoms of @entity10420 were associated with @entity9496 and were identified. Specific symptoms of @entity9496 were associated with @entity10420 , differed in some respects between @entity1 and @entity1 , and demonstrated more symptoms of @entity308 for female sociopaths. @entity10420 , @entity9496 , and their combinations considered together as a possible single entity occurred with equal frequency for both sexes.
