[ @entity8 for XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity8 @entity6283 @entity5 @entity812 @entity1416 @entity1358 @entity1188 @entity158 @entity1068 @entity491 @entity1209
@entity8 is often used in the treatment of @entity1 with @entity1358 , either preoperatively to facilitate nephrectomy or as palliative therapy in advanced cases. Eighteen @entity1 (18/58; 31%) underwent @entity8 in our department since 1979, initial 10 cases with Gelfoam and steel coil (group G) and recent 8 cases with absolute @entity1068 (group A). Clinical studies of daily changes of symptoms and blood chemistry in both groups after embolization were compared and the results were as follows: @entity812 was noted immediately after embolization but thereafter well controlled without analgesics in group A. The @entity1 in group G experienced no @entity158 during the procedure of embolization but have had moderate @entity812 of two or three days' duration with @entity1209 and required surgical procedure within a few days after embolization. Post embolization fever in group A was described as higher than that in group G significantly. @entity491 was noted to be persistent for up to seven days and blood chemistry showed transient marked elevations of GOT, @entity6283 and LDH immediately after the procedure without significant value in both groups. Embolization to advanced @entity5 with many parasitic vessels or massive local invasion may not always be available for remaining of viable-appearing @entity5 cells in venous lumen, as if palliative treatment. Absolute @entity1068 may be more useful as the embolizing substance than Gelfoam and steel coil by reason of producing wide severe @entity1188 of diseased kidney. Broad marked @entity1416 may make pathological diagnosis difficult. Immunological effects of @entity8 were not observed in short term @entity1 survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
