@entity4048 and vertigo: Is a XXXX present?

@entity1 @entity3325 @entity571 @entity16 @entity735 @entity854 @entity4048 @entity74 @entity717 @entity10 @entity130
OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish whether @entity4048 @entity1 suffering from vertigo and instability have @entity74 . @entity1 AND METHODS: Ninety-two @entity1 having suffered from @entity4048 for at least 3 months were enrolled in the present study. @entity1 with a history of neck @entity130 or ear, nose and throat, ophthalmological or @entity16 were excluded. The @entity1 were evaluated in a clinical examination (neck mobility) and a test of dynamic and static balance on the Satel((R)) platform in which mediolateral (Long X) and anterior-posterior deviations (Long Y) were monitored. Our @entity1 were divided into three groups: a group of 32 @entity1 with @entity4048 and vertigo (G1), a group of 30 @entity1 with @entity4048 but no vertigo (G2) and a group of 30 healthy controls. RESULTS: All groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, weight and shoe size. @entity571 was found in 75% and 70% of the subjects in G1 and G2, respectively. Neck-related @entity10 was more frequent in G1 than in G2 (65.5% versus 40%, respectively; p=0.043). @entity717 was more frequent in G1 and concerned flexion (p<0.001), extension (p<0.001), rotation (p<0.001), right inclination (p<0.001) and left inclination (p<0.001). @entity854 were found more frequently in G1 than in G2 or G3. Static and dynamic posturographic assessments (under " @entity735 shut" conditions) revealed @entity854 (Long X and Long Y) in G1. CONCLUSION: Our study evidenced abnormal static and dynamic balance parameters in @entity4048 @entity1 with vertigo. These disorders can be explained by @entity3325 and neck movement limitations. @entity10 was more frequent in these @entity1 .
