[Radical cystectomy with sparing partial prostate for invasive XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity323 @entity322 @entity5 @entity189 @entity150 @entity1606 @entity3
BACKGROUND _ OBJECTIVE: Classical radical cystectomy for invasive @entity150 removes the urinary bladder and prostate completely and was associated with high incidence of post-operative @entity323 and @entity322 . It is uncertain whether prostate excision has any effects on the prognosis of @entity1 undergone cystectomy if the prostate is not involved by the @entity5 . Sparing the prostate in radical cystectomy might improve potency and urinary control. This paper was to report our experience of sparing partial prostate in radical cystectomy for ten male @entity1 . METHOD: Transurethral resection of the prostate and radical cystectomy with sparing partial prostatic capsula were carried out in 10 male @entity1 with @entity189 . Intestinal neobladder, anastomosed with the residual capsula, were used for reconstruction of the lower urinary tract. Clinical outcome of these @entity1 including @entity5 control,urinary continence, and sexual status was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 9 months (range 3-12 months). Postoperative pathological stage was T2N0M0 in all @entity1 . Nine @entity1 survived free of disease. One @entity1 who had recurrence of poorly differentiated @entity1606 developed @entity3 in bone and lymph nodes two months after cystectomy. All @entity1 voided smoothly. Nine @entity1 were continent day and night. One @entity1 had mild @entity322 . Of 8 @entity1 with previously sexual function, 6 maintained potency. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory urinary control and sexual potency could be achieved in radical cystectomy with sparing partial prostate. Further study is needed about the long-term effects of sparing prostate in cystectomy on @entity5 control.
