[ XXXX and anesthesia].

@entity1 @entity1468 @entity1003
The management of anaesthesia in @entity1 suffering @entity1468 has to be selected individually. There is a high rate of caesarean sections in @entity1 with @entity1468 . Intubation anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia are commonly used methods and can be considered comparable and equally useful. In our opinion, the application of regional anaesthesia should be preferred, if the initial criteria, such as normal neurologic status and @entity1003 , are fulfilled. We believe in a considerable reduction of vital risks when using regional anaesthesia. Our aim was to figure out the risk-factors of @entity1468 and preterm maturity regarding anaesthesia management. @entity1468 is a severe illness in pregnancy with a frequency of 5-10%. In 1997, we experienced 73 @entity1 with praeeclampsia according to the definition of ISSPH. Mode of delivery was conventional in 10 @entity1 , 2 @entity1 had a vacuum extraction and 61 @entity1 needed a caesarean section. The rate of epidural anesthesia for delivery was 51%. We used epidural anaesthesia in 6 spontaneous deliveries, in 2 vacuum extractions and in 30 caesarean sections. There were no problems with epidural anaesthesia and the outcome of mother and @entity1 was also considered to be excellent. We suggest to use regional anesthesia techniques whenever possible.
