[Surgical treatment of transected peripheral XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity2123 @entity23201 @entity2103
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of peripheral @entity2103 reconstruction by surgical treatment and determine the influence factors for recovery. METHODS: From 1999 to 2009, 104 @entity1 underwent surgical rehabilitation for transected peripheral @entity2123 in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The age ranged from 2 to 77 years with a median age of 30 years. Sixty-five of the 72 cases (90.2%) who underwent @entity2103 and 24 of the 32 @entity1 (75.0%) underwent @entity2103 grafting. All these @entity1 were followed for the final results. @entity2103 was scored by the gross and regional House-Brackmann (HB) facial grading system. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software package by   2 test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: In the @entity2103 group, @entity23201 IV function were achieved in 37 (56.9%), 11 (16.9%), 15 (23.1%) and 2 (3.1%) @entity1 respectively. The regional grades showed that the recovery rate of @entity23201 were 27.3% in forehead, 97.6% in eye region, 97.9% in midface and 78.6% in the mouth region. In the @entity2103 grafting group, HB grades I, II, III and IV were achieved in 4 (16.7%), 5 (20.8%), 7 (29.2%) and 8 (33.3%) @entity1 respectively. By regional HB grades, @entity23201 rate were 37.5% in forehead, 73.7% in eye region, 72.7% in midface, 44.4% in mouth region. The @entity2103 group had a higher @entity23201 recovery rate than @entity2103 grafting group (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: @entity2103 and @entity2103 grafting are effective surgical options for transected peripheral @entity2123 . The site and range of @entity2123 , the time post onset until repair, and the age of @entity1 are factors that influence the clinical outcomes.
