The relationship of XXXX with @entity10 : a retrospective analysis.

@entity1 @entity2956 @entity158 @entity10 @entity1348 @entity19534
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incidence of the concurrent existence of @entity2956 ( @entity2956 ) and @entity10 . METHODS: Forty @entity1 (36 female, 4 male, mean age: 29.9  9.6 years) clinically diagnosed with @entity2956 were screened. @entity1 records were analyzed regarding: range of mouth opening, @entity1348 ( @entity1348 ) noises, @entity158 on palpation of the @entity1348 and masticatory muscles and neck and upper back muscles, and magnetic resonance imaging of the @entity1348 . RESULTS: According to @entity1 records, a total of 40 (66.6%) @entity1 were diagnosed with @entity2956 among 60 @entity1 with @entity10 . Thirty-two (53%) @entity1 had @entity1348 internal derangement (ID), 8 (13%) @entity1 had only @entity158 ( @entity158 ) and 25 (41.6%) @entity1 had concurrent @entity1348 ID/ @entity158 . There were statistically significant relationships between the number of tender masseter muscles and @entity158 @entity1 (p=0.04) and between the number of tender medial pterygoid muscles and @entity1 with reducing disc displacement (RDD) (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The @entity1348 and associated orofacial structures should be considered as possible triggering or perpetuating factors for @entity10 , especially tension-type. There might be a significant connection between @entity2956 and @entity10 . However, most medical and dental practitioners are unaware of this relationship. Therefore, a careful evaluation of the @entity1348 and associated orofacial structures is required for a correct interpretation of the @entity19534 in @entity10 @entity1 , and these @entity1 should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach.
