The long-term anatomical and visual effect of intravitreal triamcinolone injection during vitrectomy for the treatment of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity2995 @entity6654 @entity231
PURPOSE: To compare the long-term anatomical and visual outcomes of @entity1 with @entity6654 (ERM) removed by vitrectomy and membrane peeling with or without the use of intravitreal injection of @entity2995 (IVTA). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Subjects who underwent vitrectomy and who were followed over 12 months were included. The study included two groups of @entity1 . In group 1 (71 eyes), the @entity1 underwent vitrectomy and membrane peeling without the use of IVTA. In group 2 (27 eyes), 2 mg of IVTA was given at the end of the surgery. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT), the number of @entity231 surgeries, and the use of anti-glaucomatous drugs during the follow-up period. RESULTS: This study included 98 eyes with ERM from 98 @entity1 . There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, gender, pre- and postoperative lens status, BCVA, CFT, or length of the follow-up period. The mean age for all of the @entity1 was 62.45    10.01 (mean    SD) years, and the mean follow-up length was 20.58    9.64 (mean    SD) months. In all cases, the mean best-corrected logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity improved from a preoperative value of 0.91    0.32 [Snellen equivalent (SE), 0.16    0.14] to a postoperative value of 0.46    0.36 (SE, 0.46    0.29) (P < 0.0001). The CFT was reduced from a preoperative value of 473.46    96.91  m to a postoperative value of 302.44    69.80  m (P < 0.0001). Six @entity1 (22.2%) in group 2 required anti-glaucomatous drugs to control intraocular pressure (IOP) during the follow-up period, and three @entity1 (4.2%) in group 1 required drugs to control IOP (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative visual outcomes for @entity1 with idiopathic ERM were favorable, but CFT did not return to a normal level, even in eyes in which 2 mg IVTA was used. The IVTA use after ERM removal produced no significant benefits during long-term follow-up, but IVTA did increase the risk of increased IOP.
