Length of XXXX and incidence of @entity1070 after endovascular repair.

@entity1 @entity1755 @entity1070 @entity439 @entity1028
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predicting factors for the development of @entity1070 , its frequency and influencing factors after elective endovascular repair (EVAR) of @entity1028 ( @entity1028 ). METHODS: Data were prospectively collected in a unicenter observational study (tertiary center of [endo-] vascular surgery) and retrospectively evaluated in @entity1 who had undergone elective EVAR of @entity1028 . Vascular (lumbar arteries (LA) and inferior mesenteric artery, @entity439 ) and general @entity1 (habits, medication, basic diseases) as well as procedural characteristics, were analyzed for their association with the development of @entity1070 . Pre and postinterventional computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated for @entity439 anatomy, in particular, postinterventional growth or shrinkage as well detection of an endoleak of each type. RESULTS: The study cohort included 82 @entity1 (mean age, 72 (52-87) years; 77 @entity1 , 93.9   %) throughout 36 months. The median follow-up period was 29.5 months (range, 1-57). Overall, 51 @entity1070 (62.2   %) were identified at any time during the postinterventional follow-up period. In the Cox regression, @entity1028 length was the only significant predictor (P   =   0.024; hazard ratio (HR), 1.07; 95   % confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.14). Thirteen @entity1 (15.8   %) underwent at least one secondary intervention. @entity439 growth was observed in four @entity1 because of an @entity1070 (4.9   %). No @entity1755 occurred in association with an isolated @entity1070 . CONCLUSION: The preoperative @entity1028 length (correlating with the number of LA) can be considered a risk factor for postinterventional occurrence of @entity1070 prompting to greater attention and possible preemptive therapy.
