Magnetic resonance imaging in complex partial XXXX .

@entity1 @entity410 @entity1625 @entity1315 @entity145 @entity2916 @entity4940
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were performed on 45 @entity1 with intractable complex partial @entity410 . MRI was performed with a superconducting whole-body scanner operating at 0.5 tesla (T) and 1.5 T. In @entity1 with @entity1315 , 8 of 24 @entity1 had abnormal CT, but 16 of 24 @entity1 showed abnormal MRI. 1.5 T MRI detected more abnormality than 0.5 T MRI when CT was normal. In @entity1 with @entity4940 , 5 of 7 @entity1 had normal CT and MRI. In 2 other @entity1 , MRI demonstrated an @entity145 and increased signal intensity area on the T2-weighted images which were not detected by CT. In @entity1 with @entity1625 , 5 of 6 @entity1 show abnormal CT and MRI. In @entity1 with @entity2916 , MRI revealed some increased signal intensity areas on the T2-weighted images in the occipital and temporal lobe, which were not detected by CT. Most surface EEG foci corresponded with the side of MRI abnormality. These data indicate that MRI is more informative than CT in complex partial @entity410 . MRI is the imaging technique of choice in the diagnosis of complex partial @entity410 .
