The significance of the pathologic findings in XXXX .

@entity1204 @entity1377 @entity1 @entity75 @entity5 @entity1373 @entity189 @entity1358 @entity1962 @entity420
@entity1204 includes several specific subtypes which have differing prognostic implications. The two most common subtypes are @entity420 , not otherwise specified (NOS), and adenoacanthoma. Also included in the @entity420 are @entity189 and @entity189 which have the same natural history as do @entity420 without these features. Fortunately, the above types have the best prognosis and constitute approximately 80% of all @entity1204 . They also present the major diagnostic problem for the pathologist in distinguishing @entity1373 and some of the metaplasias from well-differentiated @entity189 . The tendency would appear to be the over-interpretation of these @entity75 . Other subtypes have a much less favorable outlook. They include @entity1377 , @entity1962 , @entity1358 and @entity1358 . There are two distinct types of @entity1377 , the papillary clear cell and the @entity1358 . These can readily be separated, and should be, on the basis of prognostic implications. Other pathologic parameters play a significant role in @entity1 management and in the estimation of prognosis. These include postsurgical pathological staging, measurement of depth of myometrial invasion, lymphatic and blood-vascular invasion, serosal involvement, local spread and, perhaps most importantly, @entity5 grade. Nuclear grading proved to be a better predictor of treatment outcome than did either the FIGO or WHO grading systems. This was especially true in @entity420 , adenoacanthoma and @entity1377 .
