[Long-term outcomes after XXXX surgery: Sexual reported outcomes and quality of life in adulthood].

@entity1 @entity154 @entity323 @entity2650
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and long-term sexual quality of life after @entity2650 surgery. Seventeen-years-old @entity1 operated for a @entity2650 in childhood were included in a transversal study. @entity1 AND METHODS: Fifteen @entity1 , among the forty @entity1 treated since 1997, accepted to participate. These young @entity1 (mean age at the first surgery was 27.9  20months) were clinically reviewed and responded to questionnaires (EUROQOL 5, IIEF15 and non-validated questionnaire). This study arises about 8.4  5years after the last visit in paediatric department. RESULTS: Mean study age was 21.2  4.7years. One third of @entity1 thought that global quality of life was distorted. Although 33% of the @entity1 had @entity323 , 80% were satisfied with their sexual quality of life. The most important complains were relative to the penile appearance. Number of procedures was not predictive of @entity1 's satisfaction about penile function and appearance. Thirty-three percents of the @entity1 would have been satisfied to have psychological and medical support. They would be interested in having contact with @entity1 who suffered from the same @entity154 . CONCLUSION: These @entity1 had functional and esthetical disturbances. This visit leads to a specific visit in 20% cases. In this study, medical follow-up does not seem to be counselling and had to be adapted. Adequate follow-up transition between paediatric and adult departments especially during adolescence seems to be necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
