[A case of dural XXXX during pregnancy (author's transl)].

@entity1 @entity7026 @entity558 @entity2003 @entity390 @entity410 @entity1269 @entity391 @entity772 @entity1410 @entity911 @entity10 @entity1211 @entity1779
A case of dural @entity7026 manifested during pregnancy was reported. On December 28, 1979, a 28-year-old primipara, suddenly developed @entity10 , @entity390 and @entity391 at the 8th month of her pregnancy and soon after became unconscious. She was transferred by ambulance to our hospital. On admission she was @entity772 exhibiting @entity2003 . The blood pressure was 126/76 mmHg and the pulse rate 97 per minute and regular. Right pupil was dilated and did not react to light. CT scan revealed a subdural @entity1410 on the right side and @entity1779 in the right middle fossa. Angiography demonstrated a dural @entity7026 in the right anterior middle fossa fed by the middle meningeal artery. @entity1211 consisted of the superficial sylvian vein directed toward the superior sagittal sinus. The @entity1 was in no @entity558 , so we only removed subdural @entity1410 , decompressed externally and ligated the external carotid artery. The postoperative course was uneventful, the anisocoria was diminished, and the consciousness improved up to @entity911 , but the @entity1269 remained. Two months later a 2,760g baby @entity1 was born by Caesarean section without accident. But two weeks later, suddenly she had generalized @entity410 and became @entity772 . CT scan revealed an @entity1779 in the middle fossa again. Second operation was performed, and the nidus was electrocoagulated and removed together with the @entity1410 . The postoperative course was also uneventful. At present, one and a half years after operation, no symptom of recurrence is observed. @entity1779 and dural @entity7026 in pregnancy were discussed and the reports in the literature were reviewed.
