Evidence for a separate type of @entity2795 : XXXX .

@entity1 @entity2795 @entity425 @entity2704 @entity10 @entity63140
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical characteristics of @entity1 with @entity63140 ( @entity63140 ) with those of @entity1 with @entity2795 ( @entity2704 ) and @entity1 with @entity2795 ( @entity2795 ). METHODS: The authors used a computer search of Denmark's National @entity1 Register to screen the population for @entity1 with @entity2795 with @entity425 , and also examined case records from @entity10 clinics and private practicing neurologists and placed advertisements. The authors screened @entity1 and their relatives with a semi-structured validated telephone interview. All recruited @entity1 were then interviewed by a physician and given a neurologic examination. RESULTS: A total of 105 @entity1 with @entity63140 were identified. Seventy-two percent had four typical aura symptoms: visual, sensory, aphasic, and motor. All had at least two symptoms present during @entity63140 attacks. A gradual progression and sequential appearance of aura symptoms was typical; compared with @entity2704 , the duration of each aura symptom was usually prolonged and bilateral motor symptoms were more frequent. Of the @entity1 with @entity63140 , 72% fulfilled the criteria for basilar @entity2704 during @entity63140 attacks. The aura was usually followed by @entity10 , as is common in @entity2795 but not @entity2704 . CONCLUSIONS: @entity1 with @entity63140 had clinical symptoms identical to @entity2795 and significantly different from @entity2795 . Sporadic @entity2795 is a separate entity, and should be classified with @entity2795 .
