Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of XXXX in healthy subjects aged 21-82 years.

@entity1386 @entity2055
AIM: To calibrate eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of @entity2055 in healthy adults. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was carried out. SUBJECTS: Sixty-eight females and 42 males aged 21-82 years participated in the study. METHODS: Whole-body @entity1386 ( @entity1386 ) and appendicular lean tissue mass (LTM) were measured by DXA; resistance (R) of arms, trunk and legs was measured by eight-polar BIA at frequencies of 5, 50, 250 and 500 kHz; whole-body resistance was calculated as the sum R of arms, trunk and legs. RESULTS: The resistance index (RI), i.e. the height(2)/resistance ratio, was the best predictor of @entity1386 and appendicular LTM. As compared with weight (Wt), RI at 500 kHz explained 35% more variance of @entity1386 (vs 0.57), 45% more variance of LTM(arm) (vs 0.48) and 36% more variance of LTM(leg) (vs 0.50) (p < 0.0001 for all). The contribution of age to the unexplained variance of @entity1386 and appendicular LTM was nil or negligible and the RI x sex interactions were either not significant or not important on practical grounds. The percent root mean square error of the estimate was 6% for @entity1386 and 8% for LTM(arm) and LTM(leg). CONCLUSION: Eight-polar BIA offers accurate estimates of @entity2055 . The attractive hypothesis that eight-polar BIA is influenced minimally by age and sex should be tested on larger samples including younger individuals.
