Radical radiotherapy of XXXX : the relationship between radiation dose and survival.

@entity1 @entity137 @entity263 @entity5 @entity177 @entity1486
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aims to define the effects of different radiation dose levels on survival, local control and @entity137 in a series of 208 @entity1 with @entity263 consecutively treated with radical radiation therapy. @entity1 AND METHODS: From 1982 through 1996, 365 @entity1 with @entity263 have been consecutively treated with radical radiotherapy in Florence (n = 306) and Arezzo (n = 59). The 208 cases treated until January 1994 with Stage B (125/208, 60%) and C (83/208, 40%) are the objects of the present study. The treatment was most often limited to the prostatic area (81%), using a four-field "box technique" and 25 MV photon beams, up to a total dose of 60-65 Gy (21% of the @entity1 ), of 66-69 Gy (26%) and of 70 Gy (53%); conventional fractionation was used (fractional dose: 2 Gy; five fractions/week). Hormonal therapy was also given to 39% of the cases. The possible relationship between dose, stage, grading and survival has been analysed. The survival figures and the types of relapse observed (prostatic, lymphnodal or "biochemical") have been analysed also according to the extent of the target volume and to the @entity1486 ( @entity1486 ) value at diagnosis, in the entire series or in selected subgroups. RESULTS: In the whole series and also after radiation alone, the @entity1 with Stage B, with more differentiated @entity5 and those treated with higher doses to the prostate obtained significantly better survival results. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the dose level has an independent prognostic value. The use of a limited target volume did not produce an excess of @entity177 . Among the @entity1 more recently treated with radiation alone, the @entity1486 level at diagnosis is strongly related with the risk of local and "biochemical" failure, and also with the relapse-free survival. @entity137 was acceptable, also for the @entity1 treated with higher doses, but late treatment-related damage is more frequent in @entity1 treated on larger volumes. CONCLUSION: The results of this retrospective analysis confirm the good results of small volume, high dose radiation therapy of @entity263 , even taking into account the possible biases due to the retrospective nature of the study, and the relevance of the @entity1486 level at diagnosis to define the risk of local failure.
