[Clinical outcomes of synchronous revascularization on XXXX concomitant carotid and coronary artery severe @entity850 ].

@entity1 @entity64 @entity2998 @entity281 @entity583 @entity850 @entity204
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of synchronous revascularization for @entity1 concomitant carotid and coronary artery severe @entity850 . METHODS: From May 2012 to April 2014, 12 cases who received one-stage operation was retrospective analyzed, including the characteristics, methods of treatment, perioperative complications and health survey 30 days post procedure. Two subgroups were divided according to the different treatment methods on carotid artery, WIC and SF-36 scale were applied to compare the basic condition and recovery situation between 2 groups, the hospital stay time, costs, ventilation time, drainage and blood transfusion volume were also be compared. RESULTS: Totally 30 coronary vessels 8 carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and 5 @entity2998 ( @entity2998 ) were performed on 12 @entity1 . One @entity1 also received coronary artery bypass grafting and bilateral carotid artery revascularization (CEA on right and @entity2998 on left). Two (16.67%) minor @entity64 , 1 (8.33%) TIA, 1 wound @entity281 occurred within 30 days post procedure, and 11 (91.67%) received blood component transfusion. No @entity583 and @entity204 occured. The average hospital stay time were (36.5    25.3) days, ventilator application (37.5    31.2) hours, postoperative drainage volume from pericardial and mediastinal was (347.92    105.69) ml, infusion of concentrated red cell was 4.3 U. WIC was (5.57    1.51) in CEA and (4.25    1.50) in @entity2998 subgroup, there was no significantly statistical difference (t = 1.40, P > 0.05). the results of SF-36 was (3.63    1.76) and (5.44    1.05) in CEA and @entity2998 subgroup, there was no significantly statistical difference (t = -1.85, P > 0.05). In hospital stay time, ventilator application time, transfusion and drainage volume, hospitalization costs were also no significant statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The early outcome of synchronous revascularization on concomitant carotid and coronary severe @entity850 disease is satisfactory. The clinical results are similar in the CEA and @entity2998 subgroup.
