[ @entity101 in XXXX : A vital emergency].

@entity1 @entity8 @entity101 @entity454 @entity2631 @entity91 @entity785
PURPOSE: In @entity785 , @entity101 is feared because it is often heralding severe @entity8 . The objective of our study was to identify the frequency of arterial @entity101 and clarify its etiologies in this condition. @entity1 /METHODS: Our study was prospective. From January 2008  to May 2012, we have included all @entity1 over the age of 16  years which featured a @entity785 meeting the criteria for classification of Leroy and Medsger modified. Blood pressure was systematic and @entity101 was defined as a greater than 140/90mmHg PAS/PAD. RESULTS: We have collected 60  @entity1 . It was 50  @entity1 and 10  @entity1 with an average age of 41.1ans  13.03. Arterial @entity101 was noted in sixteen @entity1 (26.7%) with an average age of 48.8  years  13.21. It was nine diffuse cutaneous @entity785 of six limited cutaneous @entity2631 and one case of @entity2631 sine @entity2631 . Etiologic research @entity101 had concluded to a renal cause in 12  @entity1 . It was five @entity8 ( @entity8 ), three vascular @entity8 , four @entity454 ( @entity454 ) including three terminals and a moderate @entity454 . An 'essential' so-called HTA was observed in four @entity1 . @entity101 was a major sign that reported five cases of @entity8 . These @entity1 had received treatment anti @entity101 and renal extra cleansing. DISCUSSION: @entity101 is common in @entity785 . Our data approximates of literature when its frequency and severity. CONCLUSION: @entity101 is a major warning sign that under no circumstances should overlook it or novo or secondary aggravation. Its support must be very early under penalty to put at stake the life-threatening in particular during the @entity91 .
