XXXX post-percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy.

@entity1 @entity4295 @entity8763 @entity2033 @entity1151 @entity1150 @entity177 @entity810 @entity715
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) has been gaining acceptance as a preferred approach for the treatment of @entity1150 ( @entity1150 ). In addition to treating acute @entity1150 and decreasing the risk of @entity1151 , it has been reported that direct extraction of the @entity715 decreases the risk of @entity715 ( @entity715 ), the economic impact of managing which is reported to account for 75% of the total cost of management of @entity1150 @entity1 . PMT combines localized thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy. Recently, there have been some reports of reversible @entity810 ( @entity810 ) occurring post-PMT. The pathophysiology of @entity810 in such cases is due to @entity8763 -associated @entity4295 . Therefore, the overall prognosis of @entity810 post-PMT has been reported to be good. We report here a case of @entity810 post-PMT for an extensive @entity1150 of the lower extremity whereby the @entity1 continues to require @entity2033 even 5 months after the procedure. The @entity1 had normal renal function prior to the procedure and evidence of @entity8763 at the time of diagnosis of @entity810 . Our case illustrates that @entity1 with a large @entity715 load may develop severe @entity810 post-PMT thus requiring hemodialysis for an extended period of time. Limiting the length of time that the mechanical thrombectomy is performed and quantifying the amount of effluent obtained would appear to be a prudent practice to reduce the risks of @entity177 . However, no specific guidelines exist as for the limits of hemolysed exudates to be collected.
