[Estimation of preoperative corneal power in XXXX with myopic LASIK based on postoperative corneal data measured from Orbscan II].

@entity1 @entity267 @entity231
OBJECTIVE: Compare the change of pre- and post-operative posterior corneal curvature measurements in peripheral fitting zones using the Orbscan II topographer in @entity1 undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). To establish a new ratio of the anterior and posterior corneal curvature for the calculation of preoperative total corneal power using postoperative corneal data alone in @entity1 after LASIK. METHODS: Retrospectively analyzed the changes of posterior corneal curvature in peripheral 7 to 10 mm fitting zones in 151 right eyes (151 individuals) 3 month after LASIK as measured by Orbscan II. The new ratio between the anterior and posterior corneal curvature was measured. The new ratio was used to estimate pre-operative total corneal refractive power in 30 eyes. The estimated total corneal refractive power was compared with the value measured from Orbscan II preoperatively. The accuracy of intraocular lens power estimated in 2 cases underwent @entity231 surgery after corneal refractive surgery was studied. RESULTS: The mean difference in estimated pre- and post-operative power of the posterior @entity267 was (-0.005    0.154) mm (t = 0.417, P = 0.677). The ratio between the preoperative anterior central (0 - 7 mm) corneal curvature and the posterior peripheral (7 to 10 mm) corneal curvature was 1.167    0.030. Estimated mean pre-operative total corneal power was (43.49    1.79) D, whereas the value measuring from Orbscan II preoperatively was (43.77    1.53) D. The mean difference between these two measurements was (-0.28    1.00) D (t = -1.523, P = 0.139). The spherical equivalent refraction after @entity231 extraction of the two cases undertaken @entity231 surgery after corneal refractive surgery was 0.54 D and 0.69 D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in posterior corneal curvature measurement following myopic LASIK using the peripheral fitting zone with the Orbscan II, as compared to the preoperative values, is clinically insignificant. The pre-LASIK corneal power can be estimated using post-LASIK data together with the new calculated ratio. This will be useful in post-LASIK @entity1 requiring @entity231 surgery but without the availability of pre-LASIK corneal data for the estimation of the intraocular lens power.
