True and false XXXX on endoscopic ultrasonography: Two-case analysis.

@entity1 @entity788 @entity1819 @entity75 @entity5 @entity1066 @entity660 @entity439 @entity715 @entity356 @entity2849 @entity438
INTRODUCTION: The etiology of true and false @entity438 is different, but the differential X-ray contrast diagnosis could be difficult. Purpose - to detect endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) diagnostic capability for false and true @entity438 by considering two clinical cases: With suspected stomach and @entity660 . MATERIALS AND METHODS:                 <AbstractText Label="FIRST CASE" NlmCategory="METHODS"> @entity1 , female, 50-year-old with suspected @entity75 , complicated by @entity356 . Endoscopy - acute gastric @entity1066 . X-ray - submucosal @entity356 . The @entity1 was sent to the EUS with fine-needle aspiration. SECOND CASE: @entity1 , male, 73-year-old with suspected @entity788 . Ultrasound - pancreatic cysts. Computed tomography (CT) - @entity5 of the @entity788 body. @entity438 . The @entity1 was sent to the EUS to clarify the diagnosis. RESULTS: First @entity1 EUS - anechoic rounded lesion with thick wall close to the stomach. Stomach wall layers were not differentiated above the lesion. Doppler - turbulent blood flow. EUS excluded @entity75 and proved the presence of @entity439 . CT confirmed the @entity439 . Post-operative histology - splenic artery @entity2849 , destruction of the stomach wall and pancreatic parenchyma. Second @entity1 EUS - ovoid solid-cystic lesion with thin hyperechoic "capsule." Doppler in cystic part - arterial blood flow. EUS suspected saccular @entity438 with the neck and the residual lumen. Post-operative histology - true @entity438 with @entity715 masses near the wall, pancreatic parenchyma was intact. CONCLUSION: EUS can reliably differentiate @entity438 from @entity1819 and differentiate true and false @entity439 with high probability.
