[ XXXX specialist in the assessment process].

@entity1 @entity10 @entity1118 @entity158
@entity158 specialists are often involved in assessing social medical aspects of @entity1118 @entity1 . A standardized examination in the assessment process is not published. Data and statements on the assessment process between 1993 and 1997 were recorded from 15 experts by questionnaire. Statements to 568 reports were made. The majority of performance impairments were caused by back @entity158 (35.9%) and @entity10 (19.3%). All examiners integrated a psychological assessment. Although the assessment processes were very different, all examiners fulfilled the minimal criteria of the presented process for assessment of @entity1118 @entity1 . Verifying the symptoms as well as capturing some aspects of aggravation proved to be problematic. The present assessment practice is discussed with regard to the unequal procedure. On basis of the received data and the own experience in examination the process of structured assessment of @entity1118 @entity1 is presented under medical and psychological aspects. It contains a recommendation of a standardized process with minimal criteria and an optional supplement of the standardized process with problematical @entity1 (e.g.demonstration, aggravation, simulation). Minimal demands on a qualified assessment of @entity1118 @entity1 should contain the study of the history, the German @entity158 -Questionnaire, the analysis of all the @entity158 with weighting their importance, the examination and the basic registration of sensational, emotional, cognitive, behavioral and social aspects of the @entity1118 . An appended glossary of the most usable psychological tests with comments on their validation criteria aims to provide a more standard multimodal assessment of @entity1118 @entity1 complaints and functionability.
