Memory function in XXXX .

@entity1 @entity410 @entity73 @entity1315 @entity302 @entity2048 @entity4940 @entity4207 @entity2414
OBJECTIVE: @entity1 with @entity302 are at risk of specific @entity73 . We aimed to compare and characterize the memory function of @entity1 with @entity2048 ( @entity2048 ), @entity4940 ( @entity4940 ) and @entity1315 ( @entity1315 ). METHODS: @entity302 was identified by clinical data, @entity410 semiology, interictal and ictal electroencephalogram (EEG). Seventy @entity1 aged 6-18 years with @entity2048 , @entity4940 or @entity1315 had neuropsychological assessment including memory function. After adjusting for @entity302 variables, neuropsychological results of the syndrome groups and normative data were compared. RESULTS: @entity1 from all three syndrome groups were at risk of memory difficulties. The duration of @entity302 correlated negatively with memory function. @entity1 with @entity1315 had the worst memory function, significantly lower in verbal memory tasks than @entity1 with @entity2048 (P = 0.02) and @entity1 with @entity4940 (P = 0.01). The performance of @entity1 with @entity1315 was significantly below the normed mean across all verbal and most visual tasks. Compared to the normed means, @entity1 with @entity4940 had results that were statistically lower in some verbal and visual tasks, and @entity1 with @entity2048 were lower in two visual tasks only. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates @entity2414 in three common @entity302 . @entity1 with @entity1315 had the greatest impairment, @entity1 with @entity4940 had memory difficulties not previously reported, and @entity1 with @entity2048 had @entity2414 . Qualitative differences were also evident. Longer duration of intractable @entity302 was associated with reduced memory ability. Memory function and its potential impact on @entity4207 achievement are vital considerations when managing @entity1 with @entity302 .
