[One-stage surgical management for XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity1513 @entity3083 @entity281 @entity702
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of one-stage surgical management for @entity3083 . METHODS: Fifty-seven @entity1 with thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar @entity3083 were treated surgically by a single stage procedure from Jan 1996 to Jan 2001, including anterior resection, interbody outografting and anterior instrumentation in 35 cases, posterior debridement and posterior instrumentation in 16 cases, and posterior instrumentation and anterior resection plus interbody autografting in 6 cases. @entity702 -alloy spinal implants were used in 38 cases and stainless steel implants in other 19 cases. Except for three @entity1 , other 54 @entity1 were followed up for one to five years (mean 2.2 years). RESULTS: All these @entity1 had their incision healed by first intention without @entity281 or sinus formation, and no recurrence of @entity3083 was noted in any @entity1 during the follow-up period. @entity1513 correction were achieved by 21.6 degrees on the average postoperatively. There was a mild loss (2 degrees - 4 degrees) of @entity1513 correction during follow-up period. Spinal solid fusion at the interface between the graft and adjacent vertebral bodies was shown radiologically in 3.8 months on the average. CONCLUSION: One-stage surgical management has more advantages in that it can completes all the aspects of surgical treatment for @entity3083 . Anterior or posterior instrumentation with @entity702 -alloy or stainless steel spinal implants is safe, The selection of one-stage surgical procedure should be planed individually.
