Radiographic and Clinical Predictors of Cardiac Dysfunction Following Isolated XXXX .

@entity1 @entity131 @entity299
INTRODUCTION: Although @entity299 after @entity131 ( @entity131 ) has been described, there is little data regarding the association of radiographic severity and particular lesions of @entity131 with the development of @entity299 . We hypothesize that the Rotterdam or Marshall scores and particular @entity131 lesions are associated with the development of @entity299 after @entity131 . METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Adult @entity1 with @entity131 who underwent echocardiography between 2003 and 2010 were included. A board-certified neuroradiologist assessed the first computed tomography head, assigning the Rotterdam and Marshall scores and the type of @entity131 . @entity299 was defined as either systolic or all cause based on the first echocardiogram after @entity131 . Demographic, radiological, and clinical variables were used in our analysis. RESULTS: A total of 139 @entity1 were identified, with 20 having isolated @entity299 . The Marshall and Rotterdam scores were not associated with the development of @entity299 . Only head Abbreviated Injury Scale was found to be an independent predictor of systolic @entity299 (relative risk: 2.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-6.13; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: No specific radiographic variable was found to be an independent predictor of @entity299 . Further study into clinical or radiological features that would warrant an echocardiogram is warranted, as it may direct @entity1 management.
