Time to Recovery From Lateropulsion Dependent on Key XXXX Deficits: A Retrospective Analysis.

@entity1 @entity227 @entity64 @entity75 @entity74
Background. Lateropulsion, a @entity74 , delays recovery following @entity64 . The number of @entity64 may lead to differential recovery rates, depending on the intact systems available for recovery from lateropulsion. Objective. To study the impact of key postural control deficits on lateropulsion rate of recovery following @entity64 . Methods. Through retrospective analysis: 169 @entity1 with @entity64 in an in- @entity1 rehabilitation facility were divided into 3 groups: (1) motor deficits only; (2) motor and @entity227 or motor and proprioceptive deficits; and (3) motor, proprioceptive, and @entity227 . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis determined if time to recovery from lateropulsion (achieving a score of 0 or 1 on the Burke Lateropulsion Scale) differed by group. Results. Log rank tests showed that time to recovery from lateropulsion differed based on the number of deficits (group, P = .012). Post hoc analyses by lesion side showed that group differences only occurred in right @entity75 (P < .05) as compared with left @entity75 (P = .34). @entity1 recovered from lateropulsion during in- @entity1 rehabilitation if they had only motor deficits; those with all 3 postural control deficits showed the most protracted recovery. Conclusions. Rate of recovery from lateropulsion after @entity64 is dependent on the side of lesion, and number of key motor, proprioceptive, and/or @entity227 . The more postural control systems affected, the slower the recovery. Our data identify @entity1 likely to need protracted rehabilitation targeting key postural control deficits.
