[A retrospective cohort comparison of XXXX between thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and open esophagectomy].

@entity1 @entity548 @entity5 @entity260 @entity418 @entity456
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for @entity418 . METHODS: Based on hospitalization data from March 2011 to March 2014, 62 cases of @entity418 treated with thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (minimally invasive group, with 45 male @entity1 ) and other 62 cases treated with open esophagectomy (open esophagectomy group, with 45 male @entity1 ) were analyzed in a retrospective cohort. The mean age of two groups were (62  9) years and (62  8) years, respectively. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-test, whereas qualitative variables were tested with   (2) test. There were no significant difference in age, @entity5 location, pathological type, @entity5 staging between two groups (P>0.05). Perioperative data and three-year clinic outcome were collected. The three-year survival curve were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with open esophagectomy group, minimally invasive group has less amount of @entity548 during operations ((231  40) ml vs. (302  37) ml, t=4.63, P=0.000), @entity456 after operations ((490  41) ml vs. (1 090  43) ml, t=-79.59, P=0.000), and postoperative hospital stay ((16  4) days vs. (17  4) days, t=-2.61, P=0.010). Meanwhile, minimally invasive group has more operation time ((272  39) minutes vs. (242  45) minutes, t=3.97, P=0.000) and total and thoracic cavity retrieved lymph nodes (30  5 vs. 28  4, t=2.39, P=0.018; 15  4 vs. 14  3, t=2.59, P=0.011). Nineteen and 31 @entity1 had @entity260 and statistical significance difference was found between two groups (  (2)=4.83, P=0.028). The three-year survival rate was 73.2% in minimally invasive group and 71.4% in open esophagectomy group. There was no significance difference between two groups (  (2)=0.170, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy had the advantages of amount of @entity548 , postoperative hospital stay and complications, and had the same three-year survival rate with open esophagectomy.
