Prevalence of ocular motor @entity129 and associations following XXXX .

@entity129 @entity1 @entity227 @entity64 @entity11363 @entity2358 @entity910 @entity2895 @entity2896 @entity6125 @entity1319
AIM: Occurrence of ocular motor @entity129 (OMCNP), following @entity64 , has not been reported in relation to the type of OMCNP seen and in relation to brain area affected by @entity64 . The aim of this study was to identify all @entity1 referred with suspected @entity227 to establish the presence and type of OMCNP. METHODS: Prospective, observation study with standardised referral and assessment forms across 20 sites. Visual assessment included visual acuity measurement, visual field assessment, ocular alignment, and movement and visual inattention assessment. Multicentre ethics approval and informed @entity1 consent was obtained. RESULTS: In total, 915 @entity1 were recruited with mean age of 69.18 years (SD 14.19). Altogether, 498 @entity1 (54%) were diagnosed with @entity1319 . Of these, 89 @entity1 (18%) had OMCNP. Unilateral @entity2895 was present in 23 @entity1 (26%), @entity6125 in 14 @entity1 (16%), and @entity2896 in 52 @entity1 (58%). Out of these, 44 @entity1 had isolated OMCNP and 45 had OMCNP combined with other @entity1319 . Location of @entity64 was reported mainly in cerebellum, brain stem, thalamus, and internal and external capsules. Treatment was provided for each case including prisms, occlusion, typoscope, scanning exercises, and refraction. CONCLUSIONS: OMCNP account for 18% of eye @entity910 in this @entity64 sub-population. Sixth @entity11363 was most common, followed by third and fourth @entity11363 . Half were isolated and half combined with other @entity2358 . Most were treated with prisms or occlusion. The reported brain area affected by @entity64 was typically the cerebellum, brain stem, and diencephalic structures.
