Multiple-deep-breath inhalation induction with 5% @entity2614 and 67% XXXX : comparison with intravenous injection of @entity1875 .

@entity1 @entity1353 @entity26 @entity1875 @entity3810 @entity2614
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of @entity1353 induction with @entity2614 and @entity3810 followed by the same inhalational anesthetics for maintenance, we compared the technique with intravenous @entity1875 anesthesia. METHODS: Forty @entity1 scheduled for ophthalmic surgery under general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) were assigned to two groups. Anesthesia was induced with @entity1353 of 5% @entity2614 and 67% @entity3810 in @entity26 (group S: n = 20) or intravenous injection of 1% @entity1875 at the rate of 1200 ml.h(-1) with spontaneous inhalation of 67% @entity3810 in @entity26 until the @entity1 lost consciousness or received @entity1875 up to 2 mg.kg(-1) (group P: n = 20). We attempted to insert an LMA when the @entity1 's jaw relaxation was adequate. We compared induction times, recovery times, occurrence of adverse events, and @entity1 satisfaction between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean time to insertion of the LMA was significantly shorter in group P (209 +/- 118 s) than in group S (302 +/- 102 s; P < 0.05). The recovery times did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no serious side effects during the induction and recovery period in either group. Significantly more @entity1 in group P than in group S wanted to have the same anesthetic method (90% vs 50%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Multiple-deep-breath inhalation induction with 5% @entity2614 and 67% @entity3810 followed by the same inhalational anesthetics for maintenance was safely performed without serious adverse events. However, the induction time was shorter and @entity1 satisfaction was higher in @entity1875 group than in the inhalational group.
