Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Non-Obese and Obese XXXX With Adult @entity85 Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

@entity1 @entity28 @entity615 @entity86 @entity85
OBJECTIVE: Obesity can be associated with increased complications and potentially worse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of @entity28 on complications and outcomes in @entity1 with @entity85 ( @entity85 ) who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). METHODS: Multicenter database of @entity1 with @entity85 treated via MIS was queried. Of 190 @entity1 in the database, 77 fit the inclusion criteria of 3 or more spinal levels treated minimally invasively. @entity1 were divided by body mass index (BMI) < 30 ( @entity28 ; n = 59), and BMI >=  30 ( @entity28 ; n = 18). RESULTS: Mean BMI was 24.6 @entity28 , and 35.0 @entity28 (p < 0.001). There were mean 3.8 interbody fusions @entity28 (p = 0.065). Levels treated posteriorly averaged 5.8 @entity28 , and 5.9 @entity28 (p = 0.502). Mean follow-up was 34.4 months @entity28 , and 35.3 months @entity28 (p = 0.976). Baseline radiographic parameters were similar between groups. Postoperatively, SVA averaged 83.9 mm @entity28 and 20.4 mm @entity28 (p = 0.002). @entity86 -pelvic incidence mismatch averaged 17.9   @entity28 and 9.9   @entity28 (p = 0.028). Both groups had improvement in ODI scores with no difference in postoperative ODI scores between groups (p = 0.090). Similarly, both groups had @entity615 with no difference between groups postoperatively. Twenty (33.9%) @entity28 @entity1 versus 7 (38.9%) @entity28 @entity1 had complications (p = 0.452). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that @entity28 does not negatively impact complication rate or clinical outcomes in @entity1 with @entity85 treated via MIS approaches.
