Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 XXXX : a comparative study.

@entity320 @entity272
BACKGROUND: In the last few years digital dermoscopy has been introduced as an additional tool to improve the clinical diagnosis of @entity272 . OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of digital dermoscopy by comparing the diagnoses of a dermatologist experienced in dermoscopy (5 years of experience) with those of a clinician with minimal training in this field, and then comparing these results with those obtained using computer-aided diagnoses. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one pigmented melanocytic and non-melanocytic @entity272 were included. All lesions were surgically excised and histopathologically examined. Digital dermoscopic images of all lesions were framed and analysed using software based on a trained artificial neural network. Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated to assess the validity with regard to the correct diagnoses of @entity320 and @entity320 . RESULTS: Sensitivity was high for the experienced dermatologist and the computer (92%) and lower for the inexperienced clinician (69%). Specificity of the diagnosis by the experienced dermatologist was higher (99%) than that of the inexperienced clinician (94%) and the computer assessment (74%). Notably, computer analysis gave a higher number of false positives (26%) compared with the experienced dermatologist (0.6%) and the inexperienced clinician (5.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that analysis either by a trained dermatologist or an artificial neural network-trained computer can improve the diagnostic accuracy of @entity320 compared with that of an inexperienced clinician and that the computer diagnosis might represent a useful tool for the screening of @entity320 , particularly at centres not experienced in dermoscopy.
