Secondary and XXXX of the orbit.

@entity1 @entity5 @entity957 @entity1358 @entity3 @entity5702 @entity3969 @entity1491
We have presented three cases of @entity3 to the orbit. The first case illustrated @entity3 that originated from a @entity1358 . This lesion, first reported by MacCormac as being morphologically intermediate between basal and @entity957 , has become a topic of some controversy. Conley reported these @entity5 to represent 1% of @entity1491 . Several authors have reported a higher incidence of recurrence with these lesions, as compared with the @entity5702 . Recurrence of @entity1491 are reported as approximately 10%, but are four times greater in the basosquamous cell @entity5 . The incidence of @entity3 with the basosquamous cell @entity5 has been reported in between 37% and 51% of cases. The second case represented involvement of the orbit by direct extension of a @entity957 . As illustrated by this case, these @entity5 can be very aggressive and should be treated with respect. The third case showed the metastatic potential of the @entity3969 with @entity3 that involved the eye, orbit, and maxilla. Diagnostic techniques available in evaluation of these @entity5 include CT scan, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasound, open biopsy, and fine-needle aspiration. Li et al., in an article that compared MR imaging, CT scan, and ultrasound concluded that MR imaging, with the use of the 0.15 T resistive magnet, offered no distinct advantage over the combination of CT and ultrasound in evaluation of @entity1 with @entity5 .(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
