Accuracy of the XXXX wave speech research system.

@entity1 @entity3040 @entity89
PURPOSE: This work provides a quantitative assessment of the positional tracking accuracy of the @entity3040 Wave Speech Research System. METHOD: Three experiments were completed: (a) static rigid-body tracking across different locations in the electromagnetic field volume, (b) dynamic rigid-body tracking across different locations within the electromagnetic field volume, and (c) @entity1 jaw-movement tracking during speech. Rigid-body experiments were completed for 4 different instrumentation settings, permuting 2 electromagnetic field volume sizes with and without automated reference sensor processing. RESULTS: Within the anthropometrically pertinent "near field" (< 200 mm) of the @entity3040 Wave field generator, at the 300-mm(3) volume setting, 88% of dynamic positional errors were < 0.5 mm and 98% were < 1.0 mm. Extreme tracking errors (> 2 mm) occurred within the near field for < 1% of position samples. For @entity1 jaw-movement tracking, 95% of position samples had < 0.5 mm errors for 9 out of 10 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Static tracking accuracy is modestly superior to dynamic tracking accuracy. Dynamic tracking accuracy is best for the 300-mm(3) field setting in the 200-mm near field. The use of automated head correction has no deleterious effect on tracking. Tracking errors for @entity89 during speech are typically < 0.5 mm.
