A Qualitative Evaluation of Web-Based Cancer Care Quality Improvement Toolkit Use in the XXXX .

@entity1 @entity4207 @entity5 @entity283
BACKGROUND: Disease severity, complexity, and @entity1 burden highlight @entity5 care as a target for quality improvement (QI) interventions. The @entity283 ( @entity283 ) implemented a series of @entity5 care QI toolkits. OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of the toolkits, target users, and @entity5 care facilities that influenced toolkit access and use and assess whether such resources were beneficial for users. METHODS: Deductive content analysis of detailed notes from 94 telephone interviews with individuals from 48 @entity283 facilities. We evaluated toolkit access and use across @entity5 types, @entity4207 , and affiliation with @entity5 care facilities. RESULTS: The presence of champions was identified as a strong facilitator of toolkit use, and learning collaboratives were important for spreading information about toolkit availability. Identified barriers included lack of personnel and financial resources and complicated approval processes to support tool use. CONCLUSIONS: Online @entity5 care toolkits are well received across @entity5 specialties and provider types. Clinicians, administrators, and QI staff may benefit from the availability of toolkits as they become more reliant on rapid access to strategies that support comprehensive delivery of evidence-based care. Toolkits should be considered as a complement to other QI approaches.
