Outcomes of XXXX Sedation During Emergency Endoscopy Performed for Upper @entity360 .

@entity1 @entity548 @entity6312 @entity519 @entity1875 @entity360
BACKGROUND: Although @entity1875 -based sedation can be used during emergency endoscopy for @entity360 ( @entity360 ), there is a potential risk of sedation-related adverse events, especially in @entity1 with @entity548 . AIM: We compared adverse events related to @entity1875 -based sedation during emergency endoscopy between @entity1 with @entity6312 . METHODS: Clinical records of @entity1 who underwent emergency endoscopy for @entity360 under sedation were reviewed. Adverse events, including shock, @entity519 , and paradoxical reaction, were compared between the @entity6312 groups. RESULTS: Of 703 endoscopies, 539 and 164 were performed for @entity6312 , respectively. Shock was more common in @entity1 with @entity548 compared to those with @entity548 (12.2 vs. 3.5  %, P  <  0.001). All @entity1 except one recovered from shock after normal saline hydration, and emergency endoscopy could be finished without interruption in most cases. The incidence of @entity519 and paradoxical reaction did not differ based on the source of @entity548 ( @entity548 vs. @entity548 : @entity519 , 3.5 vs. 1.8  %, P  =  0.275; paradoxical reaction interfering with the procedure, 4.1 vs. 5.5  %, P  =  0.442). CONCLUSIONS: Although shock was more common in @entity1 with @entity548 compared to those with @entity548 , most cases could be controlled without procedure interruption. Paradoxical reaction, rather than shock or @entity519 , was the most common cause of procedure interruption in @entity1 with @entity548 , but the rate did not differ between @entity1 with @entity6312 .
