Assessing quality of sleep in @entity1 with XXXX .

@entity1 @entity309 @entity22
We sought to identify instruments assessing sleep quality that measure the domains of sleep applicable to @entity309 ( @entity309 ) @entity1 and are feasible to use and have appropriate reliability, validity, and responsiveness properties. A systematic review of sleep instruments was conducted. In particular, domains related to sleep that were assessed in the instruments were identified and evaluated. Feasibility characteristics and psychometric properties of instruments were reviewed. At OMERACT 9, the preparatory work was described at the plenary session of the @entity1 Perspective Workshop, and the tasks of 3 breakout groups in ranking and scoring the domains and sleep instruments were outlined. Each breakout group considered different aspects of sleep: sleep domains, feasibility, and psychometric properties. The rapporteur for each breakout group reported back to the plenary on the domains and sleep instruments that achieved the highest rank/score. The systematic review identified 45 sleep instruments of interest. Based on these instruments, 14 domains of sleep were identified. The top ranked domains were: Sleep Adequacy (1), Sleep Maintenance (2), Sleep Initiation (3) and Daytime Functioning (4). The top ranked instruments on feasibility were: Athens @entity22 Scale (2.3), Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep (4.0), @entity22 Severity Index (4.9), and @entity1 's Health @entity22 Rating Scale (5.5). The highest scored instruments on psychometric properties were: Athens @entity22 Scale (13.6), Sleep Assessment Questionnaire (13), Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (12), and MOS Sleep (11). Sleep domains have been reviewed, and several sleep instruments have been identified. These instruments should be considered for use in planned clinical trials of @entity309 @entity1 to assess their applicability.
