The detection and management of XXXX after initial suture release and decompression for @entity2168 .

@entity1 @entity154 @entity1276 @entity428 @entity146 @entity4886 @entity391 @entity2168 @entity79 @entity1829 @entity8257 @entity91 @entity10 @entity4651
We performed a retrospective study of 107 consecutive @entity1 with @entity91 ( @entity2168 ) seen by the craniofacial team at the Hospital for Sick @entity1 between 1986 and 1992. There were 51 @entity1 with @entity2168 , 33 with @entity4886 , 8 with @entity8257 , 11 with @entity4886 , and 4 with @entity154 . Six @entity1 developed @entity428 ( @entity428 ) after initial suture release and decompression ( @entity4886 , three @entity1 ; @entity8257 , one @entity1 ; @entity4886 , two @entity1 ). Raised @entity428 was considered in those @entity1 who returned with a bulging fontanelle, @entity79 , intermittent @entity10 , @entity146 , and @entity391 . The diagnosis of raised @entity428 was based on @entity1829 (four @entity1 ), progressive @entity4651 (one @entity1 ), and @entity428 monitoring (one @entity1 ). No @entity1 in this group had @entity1276 requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Once raised @entity428 was detected in these @entity1 , a second operation was immediately performed to reduce the @entity428 with the intention of expanding the volume of the cranial cavity. The second procedures included: anterior cranial vault and upper orbital reshaping (four @entity1 ), posterior cranial vault reshaping (one @entity1 ), and total cranial vault reshaping (one @entity1 ). There were no perioperative complications in these @entity1 , although one @entity1 showed subsequent recurrence of raised @entity428 requiring further cranial vault re-expansion. At follow-up, ranging from 3 to 7 years, all six @entity1 were asymptomatic without evidence of raised @entity428 . In our series, raised @entity428 occurred in 6% of the @entity1 with a @entity2168 after initial suture release and decompression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
