@entity712 : multiple XXXX may cause transient @entity712 ?

@entity1 @entity712 @entity3361 @entity1507 @entity2473 @entity955 @entity7976
BACKGROUND: There have been no reports concerning the correlation between @entity712 and @entity3361 . METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2000 to December 2007, 201 @entity1 with @entity712 were hospitalized at our institution. We could perform coronary arteriography and @entity2473 provocation tests in 37 (22 @entity1 , 67  11 years) out of 201 @entity1 with @entity712 before discharge. @entity955 was observed in 13 @entity1 (35%). After controlling @entity712 and 24h cessation of vasoactive drugs, pharmacological @entity2473 provocation tests were performed. Positive @entity2473 was defined as >90%. @entity3361 was observed in 12 @entity1 (32%) and multiple @entity2473 was recognized in 10 (83%) out of 12 @entity1 . Though ejection fraction on admission was not different between the two groups (42  18% vs. 43  11%, ns), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension after medical therapy over 1 year was significantly smaller in @entity1 with positive @entity2473 than that in @entity1 with negative @entity2473 . There was no difference concerning medications except the administration of @entity1507 and @entity7976 between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: @entity3361 , especially multiple @entity2473 , may cause transient @entity712 in a small part of unknown origin @entity712 in Japan.
