XXXX in @entity1 .

@entity1 @entity483 @entity5419 @entity16244 @entity566 @entity344 @entity3505 @entity2021
@entity5419 have increased significantly in the past decade. An accurate history is crucial in approaching the management. At the outset, food intolerance must be distinguished from @entity5419 and, furthermore, these @entity566 should be classified into either an IgE, Non-IgE, or a mixed response. The clinical features vary from life-threatening @entity2021 to milder IgE-mediated responses, @entity483 , and @entity344 . The severity of the reaction and the potential risk for @entity2021 on reexposure should be assessed. Milk, soy, egg, @entity3505 , and @entity16244 are common in @entity1 , whereas peanut, tree nut, fish, shell fish @entity566 , and @entity566 to fruits and vegetables are common in adults. Structural proteins are important determinants of the severity of the reactions and may often predict the natural history and cross reactivity. Diagnostic work up must be guided by the clinical history. Skin testing and food-specific IgE done by standard methods are very useful, whereas oral challenges may be indicated in some situations. Majority of the @entity1 outgrow their @entity566 to milk, soy, egg, and @entity3505 , and some to peanut also, therefore, @entity1 should be periodically reassessed. Novel diagnostic techniques which detect specific allergenic epitopes have been developed. Several newer therapies are promising.
