[Early oral feeding versus classic oral feeding after appendicectomy for XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity697 @entity86
The appendectomies for @entity697 are the most frequent surgical interventions (43.6%) in our service. The recent studies demonstrated the feasibility and the economical gain of the early oral feeding vs. classic oral feeding, after elective digestive surgery. We wanted to spread these results therefore to the appendectomy for @entity697 . It is about a prospective survey carrying on 110 @entity1 also left in two groups, and comparing the classic postoperative oral feeding vs. the early postoperative oral feeding on one year. The two groups were comparable and the studied parameters were : the length of the @entity86 , the hospitable morbidity, the length of the hospitalization and the cost of the hold in charge. The length of the @entity86 was not different in the two groups as well as the morbidity. The difference of the median length of hospitalization in the two groups was not meaningful. The cost of the hold in charge was meaningfully more elevated in the group with classic postoperative feeding. In conclusion, the early postoperative oral feeding in our survey doesn't reduce the length of the @entity86 and don't drag a morbidity anymore that the classic oral feeding. However if it doesn't shorten the length of the hospitalization, it drags a reduction of the cost of the hold in charge. There is a gain therefore precociously to nourish the @entity1 after appendectomy for @entity697 .
