[ XXXX compared with traditional surgery in tension-free incision closure].

@entity1 @entity3080 @entity954
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of @entity3080 in closing tension-free incisions in out- @entity1 surgery compared with traditional suturing methods. @entity1 AND METHODS: A single, blind, clinical study was carried out on 60 @entity1 divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received one or two drops of @entity3080 directly on the incision. Control (Group 2) (n = 32) received traditional nylon suturing. Both groups were evaluated after 21 days of incision closing. Statistical differences in baseline characteristics between study treatment groups were assessed with chi 2 and t tests. All p values are two-sided. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, or incision length. Length of time for @entity954 to close was less in Group I, significant difference p < 0.0001. There was also a significant difference in aesthetics in Group I. There was no significant difference in any remaining variable, such as suture dehiscence and adequate border coaption. CONCLUSION: Our study showed @entity3080 to be more efficient and advantageous in closing of incisions in out- @entity1 surgery than traditional suturing methods. Although we do not pretend to substitute these methods, we recommend the use of @entity3080 in closing tension-free incisions in certain @entity1 following rules of usage and practiced by experts.
