[A contribution to the symptomatology of diffuse XXXX (DIPF) (author's transl)].

@entity1 @entity519 @entity26 @entity3794
Diffuse @entity3794 was detected in 64 @entity1 (33 males and 31 females). The diagnosis was obtained in each case from the anamnesis, the clinical findings, the chest X-ray, disturbances of the respiratory function, and from the progress of the disease. The analysis of the material produced the following parameters ranging from indicative to typical: Dry cough was reported by 70% of the @entity1 as being trouble-some. Dyspnoea on exertion and at rest existed in 95%, and gradually increased during the progress of the disease in 76,5% of these cases. On auscultation ear-near crepitant rale was heard in 78% above the affected pulmonary parts. In 62 @entity1 (96,5%) the radiogram showed disseminated streaky-reticular as well as finely to coarsely mottled infiltrations. In more than half of these cases (53%) an increase in severity was observed during the follow-up. A predominantly restrictive disturbance of ventilation existed in 85,5%. Exclusive restriction was found in 65,5%. @entity519 was detected in 92% of our cases which was especially impressive when the arterial @entity26 pressure at rest was within the normal range. The electrocardiographic findings seemed to be less unequivocal. All in all it can be stated that in the synopsis of its manifestation DIPF can be positively identified by clinical means. This fact as well as therapeutical problems are discussed taking available publications into consideration, and respective conclusions are drawn for the clinician.
