@entity795 versus XXXX : a problem in differential diagnosis.

@entity11122 @entity1 @entity41163 @entity795 @entity1050 @entity1635 @entity272 @entity4651
The @entity795 ( @entity795 ) and the @entity1050 ( @entity1050 ) both have multiple hamartomata as prominent features. @entity11122 , @entity41163 , exostoses, @entity272 , @entity1635 , and sporadic occurrence are seen in @entity795 , whereas @entity1 with @entity1050 have @entity4651 and related craniofacial findings. @entity1050 has been observed in families as an autosomal dominant trait. Although the two syndromes can be distinguished in most @entity1 , there are features in common to both that may pose a diagnostic dilemma in an isolated case. We report the case of a 3-year-old @entity1 with @entity4651 , @entity41163 , and superficial and intra-abdominal hamartomata who illustrates the problem of differentiating between @entity795 and @entity1050 . We compare this @entity1 and another recently reported @entity1 with other published cases of @entity795 and @entity1050 . @entity1 with @entity795 , in general, show more extensive systemic involvement, including skeletal and cutaneous manifestations. @entity4651 , seen in all reported @entity1 with @entity1050 , is also found in 14% of @entity1 with @entity795 . Overlap among syndromes which include hamartomata as prominent features suggests that they might be etiologically or pathogenetically related. The present case also illustrates the usefulness of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of mixed mesodermal hamartomata.
