Occupational @entity1576 caused by polyfunctional XXXX hardener.

@entity1 @entity3408 @entity11379 @entity3678 @entity10461 @entity56 @entity1576 @entity30383 @entity2483 @entity7446
Polyfunctional @entity30383 ( @entity10461 ) is increasingly used as a water-based @entity2483 , paint primers, lacquers, topcoats and other protective coatings. The crosslinker is made by reacting multifunctional acrylic monomer with a highly reactive @entity30383 compound. @entity1576 or @entity56 from @entity10461 has not been reported previously. During 1978-1991 we came across nine cases with @entity56 from @entity10461 : two had @entity3408 ( @entity3408 ), four had @entity7446 and three had both of them. Five of the @entity1 were parquet layers, two were fibreboard painters, one was a spray painter and one was a salesman of @entity10461 products. @entity3408 was diagnosed by positive allergic patch test reactions with @entity10461 in a dilution series in petrolatum: 0.32%-0.5% gave a 2(+)-3+ @entity56 in the five cases with @entity3408 but 0.1% gave only a weak reaction in one case, whereas the @entity11379 patch test series was negative. The diagnosis of seven cases of @entity7446 due to @entity10461 hardener was based on symptoms related to exposure to @entity10461 hardener at work, and on positive provocation tests with @entity10461 hardener. One had an immediate type reaction, one a had a dual reaction, and the others had late reactions. The positive reactions with the @entity10461 hardener and the negative reactions with the @entity3678 compounds indicate that @entity10461 caused @entity3408 which is different from the previous reports in which acrylates present as impurities in the @entity10461 hardener caused the sensitization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
