Do pure @entity2048 occur in XXXX ? A case series.

@entity1 @entity5427 @entity410 @entity2045 @entity302 @entity2048 @entity3148
PURPOSE: To assess if @entity2048 ( @entity2048 ) occur in @entity1 with @entity3148 ( @entity3148 ). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 37 @entity1 with @entity3148 followed at seven different @entity302 centres in Italy, between 2002 and 2014. To assess the possible occurrence of pure @entity2048 or absences associated with myoclonias, @entity2048 were defined according to the following criteria: (i) a sudden onset and interruption of ongoing activities; (ii) bilateral polyspikes or spike-and-wave (SW) complexes; spike SW complexes at 2-4Hz; (iii) duration of @entity5427 : 3-30seconds. RESULTS: Thirty-seven @entity3148 @entity1 (25 @entity1 and 12 @entity1 ) were identified. Nine @entity1 (24.3%) had a history of simple FS during the first year of life. Ten @entity1 (27%) had a family history of @entity302 , and six @entity1 (16.2%) had a family history of FS. In 7/37 (18.9%) @entity1 , during the occurrence of MSs, a total of nineteen brief @entity2048 were captured by video-EEG recordings. @entity2048 occurred both during a brief cluster of rhythmic MSs than after single @entity2045 . The ictal EEG abnormalities observed in @entity1 with @entity2048 were similar to the ictal EEG patterns associated with only myoclonias. No differences in relation to gender, family history, ictal EEG discharge were found between @entity1 with @entity410 with @entity2048 without @entity2048 . CONCLUSIONS: @entity2048 can occur in approximately 20% of @entity3148 @entity1 and the occurrence of @entity2048 , though not essential to formulate the diagnosis, do not automatically exclude the diagnosis of @entity3148 .
