XXXX and @entity378 : coincidence or real association.

@entity1 @entity32 @entity2194 @entity548 @entity231 @entity1596 @entity726 @entity370 @entity134 @entity1906 @entity2719 @entity378
@entity378 and @entity370 share similarity in histopathologic findings and clinically occur in association with each other occasionally. @entity378 should always be ruled out before the diagnosis of @entity370 . But, the diagnosis is often complicated, especially in extrapulmonary cases. Here we present a case of bilateral @entity548 with @entity1596 . @entity2194 was initially diagnosed based on the characteristic ocular findings, negative results on chest radiography, @entity378 culture, and polymerase chain reaction of aqueous, as well as simultaneous presence of panda and lambda sign on @entity2719 -67 scans. The ocular condition improved after pars plana vitrectomy and systemic @entity134 therapy. However, @entity1906 lymphadenopathy but no recurrent @entity32 was found 6  years later. The patient received anti- @entity1906 treatment for 6  months thereafter. The eyes remained silent except @entity231 progression and @entity726 under two medications during this period. In conclusion, @entity1906 could occur coincidently or in association with @entity370 , continued follow-up is important for @entity1 with @entity2194 .
