Self-expanding metallic stent improves histopathologic XXXX compared with @entity5274 for malignant colorectal obstruction.

@entity1 @entity4 @entity1702 @entity5274 @entity86 @entity694
AIMS: To compare the usefulness of the @entity1702 ( @entity1702 ) with that of the @entity5274 ( @entity5274 ) and emergency surgery after failure of decompression (ESFD) in @entity1 with malignant @entity694 (MCO), and to evaluate post-decompression histopathologic changes. METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2015, 39 @entity1 with MCO received @entity1702 , @entity5274 , and ESFD. We evaluated the outcomes including success rates of placement, clinical outcomes after decompression, and histopathologic findings of the resected specimens. RESULTS: Technical success rates were 100% for @entity1702 and 78.9% for @entity5274 . Clinical success rates were 100% for @entity1702 and 80.0% for @entity5274 . @entity86 was significantly less frequent after @entity1702 than after @entity5274 (p   =   0.014). Histopathologic @entity4 grade was significantly lower for @entity1702 than for @entity5274 and ESFD (p   <   0.0001). There was no significant difference between @entity4 grade and duration of decompression in the @entity5274 group (p   =   0.629), while all @entity1 with @entity1702 were classified in a low @entity4 grade (grade 0-2). The rate of stoma creation was significantly higher in @entity1 with a high @entity4 grade (grade 3) than in those with a low @entity4 grade (grade 0-2) (p   =   0.003). There was no microscopic perforation in any group. CONCLUSION: Significantly greater resolution of histopathologic @entity4 was achieved after placement of @entity1702 than after placement of @entity5274 . These findings provide an indication of favorable clinical outcomes of @entity1702 in comparison with @entity5274 and ESFD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
