The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and @entity158 Therapy and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and XXXX Medicine Joint Committee Practice Advisory on Controversial Topics in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia.

@entity1 @entity697 @entity158
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Some topics in the clinical management of regional anesthesia in @entity1 remain controversial. To evaluate and come to a consensus regarding some of these topics, The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and @entity158 Therapy (ESRA) and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and @entity158 Medicine (ASRA) developed a joint committee practice advisory on pediatric regional anesthesia (PRA). METHODS: Representatives from both ASRA and ESRA comprised the joint committee practice advisory on PRA. Evidence-based recommendations were based on a systematic search of the literature. In cases where no literature was available, expert opinion was elicited. Experts selected controversial topics in PRA. RESULTS: The performance of PRA under general anesthesia or deep sedation is associated with acceptable safety and should be viewed as the standard of care (Evidence B2 and Evidence B3). Because of the difficulty interpreting a negative test dose, the use of test dosing should remain discretionary (Evidence B4). The use of either air-loss of resistance or saline-loss of resistance techniques is supported by expert opinion, but the literature supporting one technique over the other is sparse and controversial; when used appropriately, each technique may be safely used in @entity1 . There are no current evidence-based data that the use of RA increases the risk for @entity697 or delays its diagnosis in @entity1 . CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence is not yet available for the topics evaluated, and most recommendations are based on Evidence B studies. The ESRA/ASRA recommendations intend to provide guidance for the safe practice of regional anesthesia in @entity1 .
