An Analysis of Surgical Treatment for the Spontaneous Rupture of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity157 @entity5 @entity1349
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prognosis of @entity157 ( @entity157 ) remains unclear. We investigated the prognosis of @entity1 with @entity157 based on the treatments and prognostic factors associated with long-term survival. METHODS: The prognoses of 64 consecutive @entity1 treated for @entity157 from 1986 to 2013 were analyzed according to their methods of treatment. The prognostic factors of 16 surgical @entity1 were identified, and their @entity1349 ( @entity1349 ) and recurrence rates were compared to 1,157 surgical @entity1 who underwent surgery for non- @entity157 . The surgical outcomes were also compared using a propensity score matching method. RESULTS: Surgery was associated with a better @entity1349 . Curative resection was the only independent prognostic factor in surgical @entity1 with @entity157 (p = 0.040). Although the @entity1349 of surgical @entity1 with non- @entity157 was found to be significantly better than that of the @entity1 with @entity157 , no significant difference in @entity1349 was observed after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: A curative resection should be the objective of treatment, assuming the suitability of the @entity1 's clinical condition. When the liver function reserve and @entity5 extension of @entity1 with ruptured and non- @entity157 are similar, then their surgical outcomes may not be significantly different.
