Rehabilitation of XXXX with zygomatic implants: review.

@entity1 @entity1180 @entity194 @entity3202
The objective of this study was to review the published literature to evaluate treatment success with zygomatic implants in @entity1 with @entity3202 . Studies from 1987 to 2010 were reviewed. In each study, the following were assessed: indications for treatment, number of @entity1 , number of implants, length and diameter of the implants, surgical technique, prosthetic rehabilitation, success rate, complications, and @entity1 satisfaction. Sixteen studies were included, with a total of 941 zygomatic implants placed in 486 @entity1 . The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 120 months. Three different surgical techniques were used to place zygomatic implants: intrasinus implants with the classic sinus window technique, the sinus slot technique, and extrasinus zygomatic implants. The most common restoration used was fixed prosthesis, with either delayed loading after 3-6 months (89%-100% success) or immediate loading (96.37%-100% success). The weighted average success rate was 97.05%, and the most frequent complication was @entity1180 . The general level of @entity1 satisfaction was high. Zygomatic implants have a high success rate and constitute a suitable alternative to treat severe posterior maxillary @entity194 .
