Evidence of dietary inadequacy in adults with chronic XXXX .

@entity1 @entity1501 @entity2245 @entity620 @entity219 @entity904 @entity1735 @entity9138 @entity2186 @entity460 @entity972 @entity1566 @entity8728 @entity560 @entity1760
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. OBJECTIVE: Estimate prevalence of inadequate dietary intakes in community-dwelling @entity1 and @entity1 with chronic @entity1566 ( @entity1566 ). SETTING: Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In-home interviewer administered multiple-pass 24-h recalls were collected at baseline (n=77) and at 6 months (n=68). Dietary intake (adjusted to remove intra-individual variation) was compared with the dietary reference intakes (DRIs), specifically the estimated average requirement, adequate intake (AI) and acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges (AMDR). RESULTS: Macronutrient intakes, as percentages of daily energy, for @entity1 (16% protein, 52% @entity1735 , 30% fat) and @entity1 (17% protein, 53% @entity1735 , 28% fat) were within the AMDR. Despite this, inadequate intakes for @entity1 (n=63) and @entity1 (n=14) were determined for @entity904 (92 and 57%), @entity1760 (89 and 71%), @entity1501 (75 and 79%), @entity219 (71 and 29%), @entity620 (52 and 14%), @entity9138 (22 and 14%), @entity2186 (6 and 29%), @entity8728 (5% @entity1 ) and @entity2245 (24% @entity1 ). Mean usual intakes of fiber, @entity560 , @entity460 and @entity972 fell below the AI for @entity1 and @entity1 . In all, 53% of @entity1 consumed a micronutrient supplement in the previous 24 h at baseline and at 6 months-specifically, @entity460 (29, 19%), multivitamin (26, 25%), @entity560 (22, 12%) and @entity620 (9, 6%). CONCLUSION: Our results show numerous nutrient inadequacies, relative to the DRIs, for @entity1 and @entity1 with @entity1566 . This study has important implications for clinical dietetic practice in the @entity1566 population.
