Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is Associated With XXXX Progression-free Survival.

@entity1 @entity2558 @entity39 @entity5 @entity1358
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and progression-free survival (PFS) in @entity1 with @entity1358 ( @entity1358 ). The MAP score is derived from cross-sectional imaging measurements of perinephric fat thickness and stranding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 456 @entity1 from a prospective registry who were treated surgically for localized @entity1358 between 2002 and 2014. One reviewer calculated a preoperative MAP score (0-5) for each @entity1 . Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to estimate PFS. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of MAP score with risk of progression univariately and after adjusting for covariates such as age, body mass index (BMI), and size, stage, grade, @entity39 scores. RESULTS: @entity1 with higher MAP scores (4-5) were more likely to be male, to be older, to have higher BMI, and to have @entity5 (all P   <.01). Of our total cohort, 405 @entity1 had MAP scores and follow-up data to assess PFS. Dichotomizing MAP scores into high (MAP 4-5) and low (MAP 0-3) yields a hazard ratio of 2.16 for the 4-5 group vs 0-3 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-4.06, P   =   .017). Adjustment for BMI did not alter the association (BMI-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] =   2.20 [1.07-4.52], P   =   .032). Of interest, the association with MAP and PFS remains for @entity2558 @entity1358 @entity1 (n   =   287, HR   =   3.46 [1.06-11.24], P   =   .039). CONCLUSION: High MAP scores (4-5) are associated with decreased PFS in @entity1 surgically treated for clinically localized @entity1358 compared with @entity1 with lower MAP scores (0-3). @entity1358 may be associated with perinephric fat thickness and stranding.
