Effects of @entity5834 intake and smoking on neurocognition in XXXX .

@entity1 @entity286 @entity227 @entity146 @entity73 @entity5834 @entity161
UNASSIGNED: Although most studies support the beneficial effects of @entity5834 on neurocognition, its effects have never been assessed in @entity146 @entity1 . In addition, results from studies in smokers are contradictory. Moreover, there are no data available about the neurocognitive effects of @entity5834 and @entity286 together. We explored the concomitant effects of regular @entity5834 and @entity286 intake on neurocognition in 52 @entity161 @entity1 and 61 healthy controls. Verbal fluency, processing speed, and working, @entity227 were assessed. For each measurement, two tasks with two levels of complexity were administered. Our results showed that @entity5834 intake had beneficial effects on male @entity161 @entity1 only in complex tasks requiring deeper cognitive processing (semantic fluency, @entity73 ). Female @entity1 and controls were unaffected. In contrast, smoking had a negative effect on male, but not on female, @entity161 @entity1 in semantic fluency. The effects of smoking in controls were inconsistent. In conclusion, our data showed, for the first time, beneficial effects of @entity5834 intake on neurocognition in male @entity161 @entity1 . These data suggest that further research of therapeutics based on @entity5834 is needed, as this could be beneficial for @entity161 @entity1 . In contrast, smoking appears to be detrimental.
