Assessment and prevalence of XXXX after radical prostatectomy: Analysis of a historical series.

@entity1 @entity263 @entity322
OBJECTIVES: @entity263 can be treated by radical prostatectomy and provoke @entity322 as secondary effect. Our aim is to calculate the prevalence of @entity322 , characteristics of leakage and influential factors, through a historical series. METHODS: We perform a descriptive, observational and retrospective study of 1310 @entity1 who received treatment for PCa between 1989 and 2011. Prevalence was obtained after 12 months of recovery and using ICS definition. To complete ICIQ-SF and number of pads/day used we perform a cross-sectional study. The series is studied globally and divided in two groups according to oncologic characteristics. We perform a descriptive, comparative and predictive analysis. RESULTS: Prevalence of the series was 23.5%, 296 @entity1 . 279 incontinent @entity1 completed ICIQ-SF with a mean score of 11.1  4.03. 16.4% of the @entity1 use 1 pad/day or none, 69% (11.4% of the total) use compress and 22% diapers. 8% of the total use more than 1 pad/day. Clinico-pathological factors divide series in two groups: 1989-1999 with a prevalence of 24.6% and 2000-2011 with 22.8%. Multivariate analysis shows influential factors: age (65 years) (OR:1.65, p=0.013) and prostate volume (50cc) (OR:1.49, p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: @entity322 is a disease with some prevalence that varies depending on definition. The most common situation was to leak several times a day (42.2%), a small amount (59.1%), using compress (69%) most of incontinents with a mild (0-7: 88.2%) impact on quality of life. Predictive factors were age (65 years) and prostate volume (50cc). The historical changes does not influence over prevalence.
