Scoring systems for outcome after XXXX .

@entity1 @entity174 @entity3331 @entity1230 @entity3330 @entity130
Outcome assessment after @entity3331 and periarticular @entity174 are not well described in the literature. This review focuses on outcome assessment, specifically surveying various scoring systems after knee @entity130 . Additionally, we include a report on a series of 637 @entity1 with @entity1230 that were re-examined at least 10 years after the inciting incident. The series includes 48 @entity1 with @entity130 isolated to the knees, and for comparison, 107 poly-traumatized @entity1 with @entity3330 and no other @entity130 . The outcomes were assessed utilizing the Lysholm score, the Tegner activity score, the Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome (HASPOC), and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12). We calculated correlation coefficients to compare the general health questionnaires with the more specific knee scores. For the comparison of knee injured @entity1 with femoral shaft @entity174 @entity1 , we applied the Wilcoxon test. With respect to the Tegner activity score, we observed deterioration from a mean preoperative score of 5.0, to 2.8 points at follow up. The mean Lysholm score was 81.97, ranging from 15 to 100 points. However, there was no correlation between results obtained from the Lysholm score with the results of the general health questionnaires. Although not statistically significant, the general health questionnaires (HASPOC and SF-12) trended towards a less favourable outcome for polytraumatized @entity1 who sustained a @entity3331 in comparison to those with a femoral shaft @entity174 . In conclusion, the outcomes of @entity3331 in poly-traumatized @entity1 are rather heterogeneous, but generally are worse than in those with @entity130 that spare the knee joint.
