Implementing a Routine Outcome Assessment Procedure to Evaluate the Quality of Assistive Technology Service Delivery for XXXX with Physical or Multiple Disabilities: Perceived Effectiveness, Social Cost, and User Satisfaction.

@entity1 @entity717 @entity1129 @entity23406
UNASSIGNED: There is a lack of evidence on the effects and quality of @entity1129 service delivery (ATSD). This study presents a quasi-experimental 3-months follow-up using a pre-test/post-test design aimed at evaluating outcomes of @entity1129 interventions targeting @entity1 with physical and @entity717 . A secondary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of the follow-up assessment adopted in this study with a view to implement the procedure in routine clinical practice. Forty-five @entity1 aged 3-17  years were included. Parents were asked to complete the IPPA for @entity1129 effectiveness; KWAZO and QUEST 2.0 for satisfaction with ATSD; @entity23406 for estimating the social cost of @entity1129 interventions. At follow-up, 25 @entity1 used the @entity1129 recommended. IPPA effect sizes ranged from 1.4 to 0.7, showing a large effect of @entity1129 interventions. Overall, parents were satisfied with ATSD, but Maintenance, Professional services, and @entity1129 delivery were rated not satisfactory. @entity23406 showed more resources spent for @entity1129 intervention compared to @entity1 assistance without technological supports. @entity1129 may be an effective intervention for @entity1 with disabilities. Issues concerning responsiveness and feasibility of the IPPA and the @entity23406 instruments are discussed with a view to inform routine clinical practice.
