[Importance of risk factors in XXXX (author's transl)].

@entity1 @entity101 @entity6 @entity301 @entity583
Importance of risk factors as @entity101 , hyperlipidaemia, @entity6 and cigarette smoking because of hemodynamic and complication during @entity583 and influence of live quality during the first year after @entity583 was pointed out in this study. No risk factor was found in 12.1% out of 248 @entity1 . 25.8% had one, 33.5% two, 12.9% three and 3.2% four risk factors. If only one risk factor for @entity301 was documented, 35.9% showed cigarette smoking. If there were two risk factors, most of the @entity1 had @entity6 and @entity101 , and the combination @entity6 , hyperlipidaemia and cigarette smoking was favourite if there were three risk factors present. The mean age of all @entity1 was 65.9 +/- 10.8 years. @entity1 who smoked or had hyperlipidaemia were statistically significantly younger (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between number of risk factors or kind of it and pulse frequence, cardiac index, pulmonary artery pressure and third heart sound during phase of @entity583 . Also no correlation was found between the risk factors @entity101 , @entity6 and cigarette smoking and rhythm disturbance of reinfarction. @entity1 with normal lipids had significant more bradycard or tachycard rhythm disturbances as @entity1 with hyperlipidaemia (p < 0.05). @entity1 without @entity6 or @entity101 had better bicycle tests than @entity1 with this risk factors (p < 0.01). 92% of @entity101 @entity1 had regular drug medication; 14.1% of smoking @entity1 continued smoking cigarettes after @entity583 . Only 62.1% of @entity6 @entity1 , 54.1% of hyperlipidaemic @entity1 and 40% of overweight @entity1 kept diet. Because of this bad quality of @entity1 compliance there was no exact information possible in predicting value of secondary preventive measurements after @entity583 .
