Comparison of Low-Level Laser Therapy versus @entity1787 Therapy in the Treatment of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity14705 @entity228 @entity158 @entity8619 @entity1787 @entity288
BACKGROUND: The treatment options for @entity8619 ( @entity8619 ) are numerous and include topical and systemic agents. Intralesional and systemic @entity288 are used; however, the therapeutic results are often disappointing. OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of @entity1787 , laser, and topical @entity228 therapies in the treatment of @entity8619 . METHODS: One hundred twenty adult @entity1 with  <=3 cm @entity14705 were recruited into the study. They were randomly assigned, by preoperative envelope drawing, to be treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT group), @entity1787 therapy (ozonated group), and topical @entity228 therapy (positive control group). A placebo treatment containing base ointment without the active @entity228 component was administered to @entity1 in the negative control group. Response rate scores were determined on the basis of changes in the appearance score and @entity158 score of the lesions between baseline and after each treatment. RESULTS: The study subjects consisted of 56 male and 64 female @entity8619 @entity1 with a combined mean age of 42.6  8.3 years (range, 28~55 years). No statistically significant difference was detected in clinical severity among the groups. The sign scores decreased in almost all scoring groups; however, statistically significant improvement was found in the ozonated and @entity228 -treated groups. Symptom improvement was achieved after treatment with LLLT, @entity1787 , and @entity228 (p<0.05). The efficacy indices were significantly higher in the ozonated and @entity228 -treated groups. CONCLUSION: @entity1787 and @entity228 therapies were more effective than 808-nm LLLT in the treatment of @entity8619 .
