[Studies on the occupational XXXX . With reference to the survey of examinations, etiological factors and treatment].

@entity1 @entity11167 @entity308 @entity162 @entity73 @entity2166 @entity751 @entity716 @entity161 @entity44
A survey of medical examinations has been made on occupational @entity751 (O.M.A.S.). We have examined and treated on 358 @entity1 with O.M.A.S. during the past 10-15 years at two clinics; one was a company's clinic (this company has 15,000 employees) and the other was the clinic at the Dept. of Mental Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health during the past 15 years. Discussions have been made on 150 @entity1 whom we directly treated. Our 358 subjects having O.M.A.S. do not include those with secondary O.M.A. resulting from @entity716 , @entity308 , @entity11167 and @entity73 . From that reason, our subjects are categorized in a narrow sense, in a category which may be called as " @entity2166 ." The results are summarized as follows. 1. The @entity1 with O.M.A.S. were found almost in males and most commonly found among @entity1 in the twenties. 2. The average rate of @entity1 with O.M.A.S. among all the @entity1 who visited two clinics, was 4.1% at our clinic and 16.7% at the company's clinic. 3. At our clinic, the number of @entity1 with O.M.A.S. was followed by the number of those with @entity11167 , @entity161 and @entity162 . This trend was also the same at the company's clinic. 4. As the cause of O.M.A.S., we found the following occupational factors; firstly, transposition by selective promotion, secondly, complication of job-quality, and thirdly, promotion to middle management position. As to personal factors, i.e. as to characteristic individual personality we found mostly rigid and serious trait, next @entity44 and egotism, and timidity and nervousness. 5. The relation between the occupational and individual factors was examined from the psychodynamic point of view. From the result, O.M.A.S. was classified into 5 groups which consisted of the core group, dropout group, special job maladjustment group, transient reaction group and others. 6. In conclusion of the above mentioned data, the authors emphasize that it is important to explain and advise by the therapists not only for @entity1 and their families, but also for their colleagues or superiors in their working place.
