A critical analysis of the surgical outcomes for the treatment of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity323 @entity545 @entity458 @entity85
@entity545 ( @entity545 ) is a relatively common condition, which can @entity458 . Despite an abundance of minimally invasive treatments, few have confirmed efficacy for improving penile curvature and function. Surgical therapies include many different techniques and are reserved for @entity1 with stable disease of    12  months' duration. We searched PubMed for all articles from 1990 to the present relating to the surgical management of @entity545 . Preference was given to recent articles, larger series, and those comparing various techniques and/or materials. Outcomes were subsequently analysed and organised by surgical technique and the graft material used. Available surgical techniques include plication/corporoplasty procedures, incision and grafting (I_G), and placing a penile prosthesis with or without adjunctive procedures. Although several surgical algorithms have been reported, in general, plication/corporoplasty procedures are reserved for @entity1 with adequate erectile function, simple curvatures of <60  , and with no @entity85 (hour-glass, hinge). I_G are reserved for complex curvatures of >60   and those with @entity85 . Penile prostheses are indicated for combined @entity323 and @entity545 . Overall outcomes show high rates of improved curvature and @entity1 satisfaction, with mildly decreased erectile function with both plication and the I_G procedure (I_G >plication) and decreases in penile length (plication >I_G). Surgical management of @entity545 remains an excellent treatment option for @entity1 with penile curvature precluding or impairing sexual activity. Surgical algorithms are available to assist treating clinicians in appropriately stratifying surgical candidates. Additional research is needed to identify optimal surgical techniques and materials based on @entity1 and disease characteristics.
