[Possible Cerebral Infarction due to XXXX after Carotid Artery Stenting:A Case Report].

@entity1 @entity1269 @entity3538 @entity5785 @entity2553 @entity1188 @entity751 @entity1741 @entity1662 @entity850
A 62-year-old @entity1 was admitted due to @entity1662 and @entity5785 . Magnetic resonance(MR)images demonstrated watershed @entity1188 in the territory of the left middle cerebral artery, occlusion of the left internal carotid artery, and severe @entity850 of the right internal carotid artery at the neck. He was treated with a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. One month later, angiography revealed @entity3538 with residual severe @entity850 at the neck. We attempted carotid artery stenting( @entity1741 )on the left internal carotid artery, but could not pass the guide wire through the @entity850 . Therefore, we performed @entity1741 on the right carotid artery instead. At the second day after @entity1741 , the @entity1 showed @entity1662 , @entity1269 , and @entity5785 . MR images showed a new @entity1188 in the left cerebral hemisphere and bilateral multifocal segmental arterial constrictions. By keeping his blood pressure at a high enough level for one week, his symptoms were relieved, and MR images showed resolution of the vessel constrictions. From this case, we can conclude that this kind of @entity2553 after @entity1741 require contrasting treatments to those for @entity751 . Interventionalists should be aware of this condition and its treatments.
