[Evaluation of breast conserving therapy (BCT) standards for invasive and preinvasive XXXX adapted in RCO in Bydgoszcz].

@entity1 @entity0 @entity8668 @entity5 @entity189 @entity3
INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic campaign against @entity0 wide spread by Regional Center of Oncology made significant influx of @entity1 coming to our place and presenting less advanced stages of the mentioned disease. AIM: The aim of this work was estimate of BCT treatment standard for invasivum @entity5 and preinvasivunm @entity0 treatment standard which was adapted in RCO. MATERIALS AND METHOD: @entity1 presenting unifocal @entity3 smaller than 2 cm, stage No, where the minimal margin of more than 1 cm was possible to perform, were qualified to BCT. Minimal surgical border during tumorectomy was 1 cm. We were excluded @entity1 with @entity189 lobulare and @entity189 mucinosum. During qualification to DCIS treatment standard first we must exclusion multifocalis cases based on Anderson classification and Falun consens. In the other cases we based on Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) considering the @entity1 's age. We have 3 forms of treatment: simplex mastectomy, tumorectomy and tumorectomy with RTG-therapy. To BCT standard were qualified 52 @entity1 . Schematically was attended 45 @entity1 . We had 5 @entity1 which was attended based on preinvasivum @entity0 treatment standard. RESULTS: The size of @entity0 at the @entity1 which was attended based on BCT standard was 0,5-2 cm. 3 @entity1 was disqualified from BCT because we found second @entity0 focus in histopathological material. We must widen surgical @entity8668 in 5 cases. Among 5 @entity1 with preinvasivum @entity5 was 3 simplex mastectomy and 2 cases tumorectomy with RTG-therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion BCT treatment standard and breast preinvasivum @entity5 treatment standard should be using only in high specialty oncological center. It is a guaranty of right qualification and treatment for @entity0 @entity1 .
