[Clinical Research of Factors Influencing Visual Outcomes in @entity1 with XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity5861 @entity548
PURPOSE: To identify factors influencing visual outcomes in @entity1 with @entity5861 (MA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 13 eyes of 13 @entity1 with @entity548 MAs. We evaluated factors. including age, blood pressure, ocular perfusion pressure, optic disc-MA distance, MA-fovea distance, the area of the @entity548 , the time between onset and treatment, initial visual acuity, and the presence of @entity548 . Additionally, we measured the retinal cross-sectional area of the fovea with optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: There were significant differences in MA-fovea distance, area of the @entity548 , and visual outcome in eyes with or without @entity548 (p < 0.05). Spearman's correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between visual outcome (logMAR) and disc-MA distance (rS = -0.61, p < 0.05), as well as MA-fovea distance (rS = -0.79, p < 0.01). A multivariate analysis showed an independent negative correlation between visual outcome and MA-fovea distance (Stdb = -0.66, t = 3.21, p < 0.01). In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between MA-fovea distance and the affected-/healthy-eye ratio of outer-retinal-layer cross-sectional area in the fovea (rS = 0.64, p < 0.05). The cutoff value of MA-fovea distance for @entity548 was 3000 microns, with a sensitivity of 100, specificity of 77.8, positive predictive value of 66.7 and a negative predictive value of 100. CONCLUSIONS: When @entity548 MAs are located closer to the fovea, the outer retinal layer is more severely affected and visual outcomes are poorer. @entity548 should be considered even when it is not apparent, especially when the @entity548 MA is located within 3000 microns of the fovea.
