A comparison between adjustable single-incision sling and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in treating XXXX .

@entity1 @entity190 @entity260 @entity282 @entity3142
PURPOSE: To compare the subjective and objective cure rates, @entity282 , @entity260 , and postoperative quality of life of adjustable single-incision sling (Ajust(  )) versus tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O   ) in the treatment of female @entity3142 ( @entity3142 ). METHODS: Female @entity1 with @entity3142 (N  =  368) were randomized to receive either Ajust(  ) (N  =  184) or TVT-O    procedure (N  =  184) between January 2012 and October 2013. Efficacy was evaluated using cure rate, @entity260 , @entity282 profile (using Visual Analogue Scale), @entity1 Global Impression of Improvement Scale, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. RESULTS: The @entity1 from Ajust(  ) and TVT-O    groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (94.4 vs 90.7  %, P  =  0.171; 97.2 vs 90.7  %, P  =  0.195). Compared with the TVT-O    group, @entity1 in the Ajust(  ) group had significantly less @entity282 , shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative @entity190 (all P values  <  0.05). No significant difference in perioperative complications was observed between these two groups. @entity1 in Ajust(  ) group had shorter recovery time (P  <  0.001) compared to TVT-O    group. The postoperative quality of life of @entity1 in these two groups was significantly improved compared to baseline; however, no significant difference was observed in the average improvement of life between these two groups (P  =  0.115). CONCLUSIONS: Ajust(  ) procedure is simple, safe, and effective for the treatment of @entity3142 . Compared with TVT-O   , @entity1 receiving Ajust(  ) had less intraoperative @entity190 , less @entity282 , and shorter recovery time.
