[The treatment effects analysis of 164 @entity1 with sudden XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity229 @entity2319 @entity619 @entity1274 @entity393
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effective treatment of sudden @entity1274 and factors affecting its prognosis. METHOD: The clinical data and follow-up results of 164 @entity1 with sudden @entity1274 were analyzed retrospectively. All the 164 @entity1 were given intravenous vasodilator, neurotrophic drugs treatment, oral @entity229 treatment, and intratympanic @entity619 injection. All @entity1 were divided into low frequency @entity393 type,intermediate frequency @entity393 , high frequency @entity393 , all frequency @entity393 and @entity2319 group. Pure tone hearing threshold test were performed before and 3 months after treatment. All @entity1 and different groups were compared before and after treatment damage frequency of average air conduction and various frequency air conduction hearing. Analysis of gender, age, process and hearing curve type, frequency hearing of impaired before treatment, the symptoms with or without vertigo. RESULT: All the @entity1 ' hearing improved after treatment. The treatment efficiency was 46.3%, and low frequency hearing improvements were better than the high frequency hearing. Including age, process, frequency hearing of impaired before treatment, with or without vertigo isindependent factors influencing its prognosis. CONCLUSION: Based on the regular treatment,oral and intratympanic injection glucocorticoid therapy are safe and effective for sudden @entity393 ,The prognosis and age, course, impaired hearing before curve type, treatment frequency hearing level is closely related, with or without vertigo.
