Neurologists' understanding and management of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity13299 @entity66
BACKGROUND: Conversion disorder is largely managed by neurologists, for whom it presents great challenges to understanding and management. This study aimed to quantify these challenges, examining how neurologists understand @entity13299 , and what they tell their @entity1 . METHODS: A postal survey of all consultant neurologists in the UK registered with the Association of British Neurologists. RESULTS: 349 of 591 practising consultant neurologists completed the survey. They saw @entity13299 commonly. While they endorsed psychological models for conversion, they diagnosed it according to features of the clinical presentation, most importantly inconsistency and @entity66 . Most of the respondents saw feigning as entangled with @entity13299 , with a minority seeing one as a variant of the other. They were quite willing to discuss psychological factors as long as the @entity1 was receptive but were generally unwilling to discuss feigning even though they saw it as their responsibility. Those who favoured models in terms of feigning were older, while younger, female neurologists preferred psychological models, believed conversion would one day be understood neurologically and found communicating with their conversion @entity1 easier than it had been in the past. DISCUSSION: Neurologists accept psychological models for @entity13299 but do not employ them in their diagnosis; they do not see conversion as clearly different from feigning. This may be changing as younger, female neurologists endorse psychological views more clearly and find it easier to discuss with their @entity1 .
