Traumatic @entity1066 and XXXX during orthodontic treatment.

@entity1 @entity1066 @entity158
In the present investigation the frequency of oral @entity1066 and @entity158 in 161 orthodontic @entity1 was recorded. Of all @entity1 , 95% had experienced @entity158 , but 84.5% said that the @entity158 lasted a few days only. About 11% maintained that the treatment was constantly painful. Significantly more @entity1 coming from private clinics complained of @entity158 than those attending treatment at the Department of Orthodontics. About 50% said that activating or changing archwire was most annoying, whereas 28.7% said @entity1066 and 21% said headgear was the most annoying part of the treatment. According to 75% of the @entity1 , sleeping habits were not influenced. Only eight @entity1 reported truancy, and seven of these had done this only once. Of all @entity1 , 6.2% had requested interim visits. Small wounds caused by the fixed appliance were reported by 75.8% of the @entity1 , and 2.5% had suffered badly from @entity1066 caused by the fixed appliances. More @entity1 than @entity1 reported @entity1066 . There was a significant sex difference as regards recurrent aphthous @entity1066 (RAU). Increase in the frequency of RAU was reported by 23.1% of the @entity1 and 9.6% of the @entity1 while they had fixed appliances.
