[Surgical treatment of XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity439 @entity1756 @entity438
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the surgical strategies and analyze the clinical outcomes of @entity438 ( @entity438 ). METHODS: The clinical data of 49 @entity438 @entity1 surgically treated between January 2009 and December 2013 was analyzed retrospectively. Among the 49 @entity1 , 12 @entity1 were male and 37 were female, mean age (49    11) years. Thirty-five @entity1 had @entity1756 , and 14 had @entity439 . Treatment strategies included one-stage operation ( @entity438 were treated in one-stage with an unilateral approach), two-stage treatment ( @entity438 were treated stage by stage) and partial treatment (only ruptured @entity439 was treated). Postoperative CT angiograms (CTA) or digital subtraction angiograms (DSA) were reviewed and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores were evaluated during follow-up period. RESULTS: Thirty-two @entity1 (65.3%) underwent one-stage operation, 9 @entity1 (18.4%) underwent two-stage treatment, and 8 @entity1 (16.3%) underwent partial treatment. Forty-seven @entity1 were followed up 4-49 months, mean (22    7) months. Postoperative CTA or DSA showed no @entity439 recurrence. According to the GOS scores, 41 @entity1 (83.7%) with good outcomes (GOS 4, 5), 6 @entity1 (12.2%) were disabled (GOS 2, 3) and 2 @entity1 (4.1%) were dead (GOS 1). CONCLUSION: Selecting the right @entity1 for surgery and making personalized surgical strategies based on the characteristics of @entity1 and @entity439 could improve the surgical outcomes of @entity438 .
