Incidence of four syndromes of XXXX .

@entity1 @entity1643 @entity2371 @entity530 @entity158 @entity10100
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective epidemiologic cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of clearly defined pelvic @entity158 in pregnancy based on both history and objective confirmation and to classify pelvic @entity158 into four groups and determine their incidence. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic and @entity1643 in pregnancy is a substantial problem, and the correct treatment is hampered by several factors, such as the lack of clearly defined clinical conditions, variety of nomenclature, and great variance in reported incidence (range 4-76.4%). This variation in incidence is a problem that calls for a clearly defined criteria and a study design aimed at resolving such varying incidence rates. METHODS: All pregnant @entity1 booked for delivery at two Danish hospitals over a 1-year period were offered to participate in the study in week 33 of gestation. @entity1 who reported daily @entity158 from @entity530 , which could be objectively confirmed, were divided, according to symptoms, into five subgroups: four classification groups ( @entity10100 , symphysiolysis, one-sided sacroiliac syndrome, and double-sided sacroiliac syndrome) and one miscellaneous. A total of 1460 @entity1 formed the incidence cohort based on geographic criteria. RESULTS: A total of 293 @entity1 (20.1%) were found to have pelvic @entity158 divided in one of the four classification groups: @entity10100 6.0%, symphysiolysis 2.3%, one-sided sacroiliac syndrome 5.5%, and double-sided sacroiliac syndrome 6.3%. CONCLUSION: This study proposes new, more precise procedures for the identification and classification of @entity2371 based on both reports from the @entity1 and a physical examination. Presumably, the 20.1% incidence rate, identified in the present study, represents the most precise and reliable information available hitherto, regarding the incidence of @entity2371 .
