Validation of the @entity82 and @entity194 on the new pathological classification in XXXX with @entity2316 : A single-center study in China.

@entity1 @entity82 @entity2316 @entity470 @entity412 @entity194 @entity1011 @entity3918
OBJECTIVES: The association between @entity82 and @entity194 (IFTA) and the clinical outcomes in @entity2316 ( @entity2316 ) remains unclear. This study is to evaluate the clinical predictors and renal prognosis of IFTA score in @entity1 with @entity2316 . METHODS: 52 cases with @entity2316 with renal biopsy were divided into three groups according to IFTA score. The   (2) test or Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Spearman's correlation analysis were used in this subject. Ordinal regression mode was utilized to evaluate which clinical factors might be the predictors of IFTA score. RESULTS: Compared to IFTA score 1 group, the @entity1 in score 3 were younger and have greatly lower level of @entity470 and hemoglobin and higher serum @entity1011 (p<0.01). A close relationship between the clinical findings and IFTA was observed, such as IFTA with @entity470 (r=-0.58, P<0.01), @entity412 (r=-0.29, P=0.04), Hb (r=-0.38, P<0.01), systolic blood pressure (r=0.29, P=0.04) and urinary protein level (r=0.46, P<0.01); in addition, @entity470 (OR 0.31 (95%Cl -1.883 to -0.485) p=0.001) showed statistical significance with IFTA. The 5-year renal survival rate was estimated as 100% in IFTA score 0, 88.9% in score 1, 76.9% in score 2, and 20.0% in score 3. Furthermore, greatly lower level of @entity470 , and higher serum @entity1011 and BUN in the glomerular class IV were seen (p<0.01 vs class II), with positive correlation with IFTA (r=0.51, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The renal pathologic diagnosis in IFTA score was a good predictor for renal prognosis in @entity3918 . @entity470 might be a predictor of IFTA in @entity1 with @entity2316 .
