Endoscopic follow-up of @entity1 after curative surgery for XXXX : results of a medical assistance protocol.

@entity1 @entity1127 @entity5 @entity254 @entity6523 @entity14 @entity1141
AIMS: To evaluate the results of an endoscopic follow-up assistance protocol for @entity14 ( @entity14 ) after curative surgery. @entity1 AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 205 @entity1 with @entity14 were submitted to curative surgery in our hospital. An endoscopic follow-up was proposed to the @entity1 based on an endoscopy six months following surgery, in the case they did not have a complete endoscopy prior to surgery, or one year after surgery if they did, another one two years later, and a third endoscopy between the third and fifth year. We retrospectively analyzed the follow-up outcome and endoscopic findings. RESULTS: 155 @entity1 were submitted to follow-up, of which 74,2% completed the protocol. 3 @entity5 , 4 @entity254 relapses and 2 @entity5 were detected. Curative surgery was performed on 100% of the @entity5 , 50% of the relapses and 50% of the @entity5 . 48.3% and 20.6% of the @entity1 had synchronous and @entity1127 , respectively. 14.7% of the @entity1127 were larger than 1 cm, 21.7% and 4.8% were tubulovillous and villous, respectively, and 3.7% had severe @entity1141 . Finally, @entity1 with @entity1127 had higher risk of developing @entity1127 (RR 7.1, CI 95% 2.3; 22.2, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of @entity6523 with high risk of @entity5 or relapses detected by colonoscopy is low in our series. On the other hand, the detection of @entity1127 during follow-up was related to the presence of @entity1127 .
