Comparison of local anesthesia with XXXX and @entity3303 in septoplasty procedure.

@entity1 @entity260 @entity21456 @entity3303 @entity158 @entity282
BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have so far compared the use of different local anesthetic agents in septoplasty procedure with regard to reduction in @entity158 , effectiveness, and related complications. The aim of this study was to compare @entity21456 and @entity3303 as local anesthetics for septoplasty surgery, in terms of their efficacy and safety. METHODS: Seventy @entity1 randomized into two groups were included in this study. For local anesthesia, 35 @entity1 received @entity21456 and 35 received @entity3303 . All @entity1 were asked to rate their @entity158 levels on a visual analog scale (VAS) at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 12th, 18th, and 24th postoperative hours. In addition, analgesic consumption of each @entity1 as well as @entity260 was recorded in both groups. RESULTS: VAS scores for @entity158 were significantly lower in the @entity21456 group than in the @entity3303 group at the 2nd, 6th, 8th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours (p< 0.05). Comparison of the @entity1 ' usage of analgesics during the first 24 hours postoperatively showed that in the @entity21456 group, the percentage of @entity1 that had not used analgesics was 58.5%, and in the @entity3303 group the corresponding figure was 41.5%. CONCLUSION: @entity21456 is a safe local anesthetic agent with rapid onset of action. When compared with @entity3303 , it is associated with improved tissue diffusion, rare @entity260 , and less @entity282 , thus, representing a safe and effective local anesthetic agent for septoplasty procedure.
