[Multiple imaging procedures including MRI in XXXX ].

@entity1 @entity1184 @entity5 @entity189 @entity150
Endoscopic photography, double contrast cystography, transurethral echography, X-ray CT scan, and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) were utilized for the staging diagnosis of the four @entity1 with @entity150 . In the first case, a 70-year-old @entity1 , since all of the five imaging procedures suggested a superficial and pedunculated @entity5 , his @entity150 was considered T1. The classification of stage T3 @entity189 was made for the second 86-year-old male. Because all of his imaging examinations showed a @entity5 infiltrating deep muscle and penetrating the bladder wall. The third case was a 36-year-old male. His clinical stage was diagnosed as T2 or T3a by cystophotography, double contrast cystogram, ultrasonography, and X-ray CT scan. However, MRI showed only thickened bladder wall and the infiltrating @entity5 could not be distinguished from the @entity1184 wall. The last @entity1 , a 85-year-old female, had a smaller Ta @entity5 . Her double contrast cystography revealed the small @entity5 at the lateral bladder wall. But, the @entity5 could not be detected by transaxial, sagittal and coronal scans. Multiple imaging procedures combining MRI and staging diagnosis of the @entity150 were discussed.
